Anderson #062997 v. Ryan et al
Filing
17
ORDER: The Report and Recommendation 16 is ADOPTED and the petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED a Certificate of Appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal are DENIED because the dismissal of the petition is justified by a plain procedural bar and jurists of reason would not find the procedural ruling debatable. Signed by Senior Judge Roslyn O Silver on 7/14/2017. (REK)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
9
Ira Joe Anderson,
Petitioner,
10
11
ORDER
v.
12
No. CV-16-01577-PHX-ROS
Charles L Ryan, et al.,
13
Respondents.
14
15
On April 7, 2017, Magistrate Judge Eileen S. Willett issued a Report and
16
Recommendation (“R&R”) recommending the petition for writ of habeas corpus be
17
denied and dismissed with prejudice. (Doc. 16.) No objections were filed.
18
A district judge “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or
19
recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Where any party
20
has filed timely objections to the R&R, the district court’s review of the part objected to
21
must be de novo. Id. If, however, no objections are filed, the district court need not
22
conduct such a review. Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz.
23
2003). No objections having been filed, the R&R will be adopted in full.
24
Accordingly,
25
IT IS ORDERED the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 16) is ADOPTED and
26
the petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED.
27
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED a Certificate of Appealability and leave to proceed
28
in forma pauperis on appeal are DENIED because the dismissal of the petition is justified
1
by a plain procedural bar and jurists of reason would not find the procedural ruling
2
debatable.
3
Dated this 14th day of July, 2017.
4
5
6
Honorable Roslyn O. Silver
Senior United States District Judge
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?