Bashir v. Donahue

Filing 20

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: IT IS ORDERED that the R&R (Doc. 18 ) is accepted and adopted. The Petition is denied and dismissed without prejudice and the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 10/28/16. (KGM)

Download PDF
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Tahiru Bashir, Petitioner, 10 11 ORDER v. 12 No. CV-16-01837-PHX-JAT Michael Donahue, et al., 13 Respondents. 14 15 Pending before this Court is Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed 16 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The Magistrate Judge to whom this case was assigned 17 issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”), recommending that the Petition be 18 denied. (Doc. 18). Neither party has filed objections to the R&R. 19 The Court hereby accepts the R&R. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985) 20 (finding that district courts are not required to conduct “any review at all . . . of any issue 21 that is not the subject of an objection” (emphasis added)); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 22 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (“statute makes it clear that the district 23 judge must review the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if 24 objection is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis in original)); see also Schmidt v. 25 Johnstone, 263 F.Supp.2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003). 26 Therefore, 27 IT IS ORDERED that the R&R (Doc. 18) is accepted and adopted. The Petition 28 is denied and dismissed without prejudice and the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment 1 2 accordingly.1 Dated this 28th day of October, 2016. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 No certificate of appealability is required. See Forde v. U.S. Parole Comm'n, 114 F.3d 878, 879 (9th Cir. 1997). -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?