Bashir v. Donahue
Filing
20
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: IT IS ORDERED that the R&R (Doc. 18 ) is accepted and adopted. The Petition is denied and dismissed without prejudice and the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 10/28/16. (KGM)
1
WO
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
9
Tahiru Bashir,
Petitioner,
10
11
ORDER
v.
12
No. CV-16-01837-PHX-JAT
Michael Donahue, et al.,
13
Respondents.
14
15
Pending before this Court is Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed
16
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The Magistrate Judge to whom this case was assigned
17
issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”), recommending that the Petition be
18
denied. (Doc. 18). Neither party has filed objections to the R&R.
19
The Court hereby accepts the R&R. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985)
20
(finding that district courts are not required to conduct “any review at all . . . of any issue
21
that is not the subject of an objection” (emphasis added)); United States v. Reyna-Tapia,
22
328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (“statute makes it clear that the district
23
judge must review the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if
24
objection is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis in original)); see also Schmidt v.
25
Johnstone, 263 F.Supp.2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003).
26
Therefore,
27
IT IS ORDERED that the R&R (Doc. 18) is accepted and adopted. The Petition
28
is denied and dismissed without prejudice and the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment
1
2
accordingly.1
Dated this 28th day of October, 2016.
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
No certificate of appealability is required. See Forde v. U.S. Parole Comm'n,
114 F.3d 878, 879 (9th Cir. 1997).
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?