Cresante v. USA

Filing 13

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 12 - IT IS FURTHER ORDERED Petitioner's Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 11) is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED Petitioner's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence by a person in Federal Custody pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Doc. 1 ) is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. (See document for further details). Signed by Senior Judge Roslyn O Silver on 2/2/17. (LAD)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Samuel Cresante, Petitioner, 10 11 ORDER v. 12 No. CV-16-02049-PHX-ROS No. CR-10-00117-PHX-ROS USA, 13 Respondent. 14 15 On November 28, 2016, Magistrate Judge John Z. Boyle issued a Report and 16 Recommendation (“R&R”) recommending Petitioner’s Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or 17 Correct Sentence by a person in Federal Custody pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Doc. 1) 18 be dismissed without prejudice. (Doc. 12.) No objections were filed. 19 A district judge “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or 20 recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). Where any party 21 has filed timely objections to the R&R, the district court’s review of the part objected to 22 must be de novo. Id. If, however, no objections are filed, the district court need not 23 conduct such a review. Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 24 2003). No objections having been filed, the R&R will be adopted in full. 25 Accordingly, 26 IT IS ORDERED the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 12) is ADOPTED. 27 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED Petitioner’s Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 11) is 28 GRANTED. 1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED Petitioner’s Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or 2 Correct Sentence by a person in Federal Custody pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Doc. 1) is 3 DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 4 Dated this 2nd day of February, 2017. 5 6 7 Honorable Roslyn O. Silver Senior United States District Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?