Grant v. USA
Filing
23
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The Motion to Lift the Stay 19 is granted. The Report and Recommendation 22 is accepted, the Motion 1 is denied, with prejudice, and the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly. IT IS FINAL LY ORDERED that a Certificate of Appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal are denied because Movant has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 9/10/2018. (REK)
1
WO
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
9
Steven Houston Grant,
Movant/Defendant,
10
11
ORDER
v.
12
CV-16-02057-PHX-JAT
CR-06-00526-PHX-JAT
USA,
13
Respondent/Plaintiff.
14
15
Pending before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (R&R) of the
16
Magistrate Judge recommending that the Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct
17
Sentence pending in this case be denied. Neither party has filed objections to the R&R.
18
Because neither party has objected, the Court hereby accepts the R&R. See
19
Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985) (finding that district courts are not required to
20
conduct “any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an objection”
21
(emphasis added)); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003)
22
(en banc) (“statute makes it clear that the district judge must review the magistrate
23
judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise”
24
(emphasis in original)); see also Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F.Supp.2d 1219, 1226 (D.
25
Ariz. 2003).
26
Based on the foregoing,
27
IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Lift the Stay (Doc. 19) is granted.
28
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 22) is
1
accepted, the Motion (Doc. 1) is denied, with prejudice, and the Clerk of the Court shall
2
enter judgment accordingly.
3
IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that a Certificate of Appealability and leave to
4
proceed in forma pauperis on appeal are denied because Movant has not made a
5
substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.
6
Dated this 10th day of September, 2018.
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?