Taylor v. USA
Filing
15
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: The R&R (Doc. 13 ) is accepted. The Motion to Stay (Doc. 6 ) is granted. The government's answer/opposition to the motion to vacate sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 shall be filed no later than 14 days after the Supreme Court issues its decision in Beckles v. United States, No. 15-8544(cert. granted June 27, 2016). Signed by Judge David G Campbell on 1/30/17. (KGM)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
9
United States of America,
No. CV16-2063 PHX DGC (DMF)
CR07-1231 PHX DGC
Plaintiff/Respondent,
10
ORDER
11
vs.
12
Claney Lee Taylor,
Defendant/Movant.
13
14
15
Defendant/Movant, Claney Lee Taylor, has filed a motion to vacate sentence
16
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Doc. 1. On August 26, 2016 Plaintiff/Respondent, United
17
States of America, filed a motion to stay. Doc. 6. The motion is fully briefed. United
18
States Magistrate Judge Deborah M. Fine has issued a report and recommendation
19
(“R&R”) recommending that the motion to stay be granted. Doc. 13. No objection has
20
been filed, which relieves the Court of its obligation to review the R&R. See 28 U.S.C. §
21
636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); United
22
States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). The Court will accept the
23
R&R and grant the motion to stay.
24
IT IS ORDERED:
25
1.
The R&R (Doc. 13) is accepted.
26
2.
The motion to stay (Doc. 6) is granted.
27
3.
The government’s answer/opposition to the motion to vacate sentence
28
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 shall be filed no later than 14 days after the
1
Supreme Court issues its decision in Beckles v. United States, No. 15-8544
2
(cert. granted June 27, 2016).
3
Dated this 30th day of January, 2017.
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
‐ 2 ‐
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?