Agustin-Simon v. USA
Filing
47
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: Magistrate Judge Eileen Willet's R&R (Doc. 15 ) is accepted. The motion to vacate sentence (Doc. 1 ) is denied. A certificate of appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal are denied. The Clerk shall terminate this action. See document for further details. Signed by Senior Judge David G Campbell on 3/6/2019. (RMV)
1
WO
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
9
Domingo Agustin Simon,
Petitioner,
10
11
ORDER
v.
12
No. CV16-2715 PHX DGC
United States,
13
Respondent.
14
Pending before the Court is Movant’s 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion to vacate, set aside,
15
or correct his sentence, filed on August 10, 2016 (Doc. 1), and Magistrate Judge Eileen
16
Willett’s Report and Recommendation (“October 5 R&R”), recommending that the Court
17
deny the motion. Doc. 18. The Court previously accepted the October 5 R&R on
18
November 7, 2017, after Movant failed to file an objection. Doc. 19. Movant then filed a
19
motion to vacate the Court’s November 7 judgment, stating that he never received a copy
20
of the October 5 R&R. Doc. 21 at 4. Movant also requested leave to amend his § 2255
21
motion. Doc. 21. The Magistrate issued a second R&R (“July 20 R&R”) recommending
22
that both motions be denied. Doc. 32.
23
On August 20, 2018 Movant filed an objection to the July 20 R&R, asserting that
24
he did not receive a copy of Judge Willet’s October 5 R&R. Doc. 21 at 2,4. On November
25
28, 2018, the Court vacated its November 7 order and instructed the Clerk of Court to
26
resend Movant a copy of the October 5 R&R. Doc.41 at 3-4. Per the Court’s order, Movant
27
could file an objection that only addressed the October 5 R&R’s findings and conclusions.
28
Id. at 4. The Court denied Movant’s request to amend his § 2255 motion as untimely. Id.
1
The Court sent the documents to Movant’s new address, as identified in notices
2
provided by the Government and Movant. See Docs. 42, 45, 46. Movant was directed to
3
file his objection by February 28, 2019. Movant has failed to file an objection, which
4
relieves the Court of its obligation to review the R&R. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R.
5
Civ. P. 72(b)(3); Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 149 (1985). The Court will therefore accept the
6
October 5 R&R and deny the motion.
7
IT IS ORDERED:
8
1.
Magistrate Judge Eileen Willet’s October 5 R&R (Doc. 15) is accepted.
9
2.
The motion to vacate sentence (Doc. 1) is denied.
10
3.
A certificate of appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on
11
appeal are denied.
12
4.
The Clerk shall terminate this action.
13
Dated this 6th day of March, 2019.
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?