Brown et al v. Sperber-Porter et al

Filing 263

ORDER: The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge 244 is adopted as the Order of this Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court will enter by separate order the charging orders against Eva Sperber-Porter's interests in Baseline, L itchfield, and TDO, as set forth in Attachments A, B, and C. (Doc. 169 , 170 , and 171 ) IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying as moot Petitioner's remaining petitions for charging orders. (Doc. 172 , 173 , and 174 ) Signed by Senior Judge Susan R Bolton on 4/30/2018. (REK)

1

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

8
9

Rickman Brown, et al.,
Petitioners,

10
11

ORDER

v.

12

No. CV-16-02801-PHX-SRB

Eva Sperber-Porter, et al.,

13

Respondents.

14
15

On March 30, 2018 the Magistrate Judge issued her Report and Recommendation

16

recommending that certain of Petitioners’ petitions for charging orders (Docs. 169, 170

17

and 171) be granted and others withdrawn and that the Court enter charging orders

18

against Evan Sperber-Porter’s interest in Baseline, Litchfield, and TDI, as set forth in

19

Attachments A, B, and C all in accordance with the parties’ stipulation. She also

20

recommended that Petitioners’ withdrawn petitions for charging orders (Doc. 172, 173

21

and 174) be denied as moot. In her Report and Recommendation the Magistrate Judge

22

advised the parties that they had fourteen days from the date of service of a copy of the

23

Report and Recommendation within which to file specific written objections with the

24

Court. The time to file such objections has expired and no objections to the Report and

25

Recommendation have been filed.

26
27
28

The Court finds itself in agreement with the Report and Recommendation of the
Magistrate Judge.
IT IS ORDERED adopting the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate

1

Judge as the Order of this Court.

2

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court will enter by separate order the

3

charging orders against Eva Sperber-Porter’s interests in Baseline, Litchfield, and TDO,

4

as set forth in Attachments A, B, and C. (Doc. 169, 170, and 171)

5
6
7

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying as moot Petitioner’s remaining petitions for
charging orders. (Doc. 172, 173, and 174)
Dated this 30th day of April, 2018.

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-2-