Frankel v. Aramark Business Facilities LLC et al

Filing 11

ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that by October 7, 2016, Defendant shall file a supplement to the notice of removal properly alleging federal subject matter jurisdiction or this case will be remanded to state court. See attached Order for complete details. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 9/30/2016. (KAL)

Download PDF
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Ivy Frankel, No. CV-16-03101-PHX-JAT Plaintiff, 10 11 v. 12 ORDER Aramark Services Incorporated, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 “Inquiring whether the court has jurisdiction is a federal judge=s first duty in every 16 case.” Belleville Catering Co. v. Champaign Market Place, L.L.C., 350 F.3d 691, 693 17 (7th Cir. 2003). Here, Defendant removed this case based on diversity jurisdiction, but 18 failed to plead the citizenship of a corporation as required by Hertz Corp. v. Friend, 559 19 U.S. 77, 80, 92-93 (2010). Therefore, 20 IT IS ORDERED that by October 7, 2016, Defendant shall file a supplement to 21 the notice of removal properly alleging federal subject matter jurisdiction or this case will 22 be remanded to state court. 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated this 30th day of September, 2016.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?