Turchetta v. Colvin

Filing 34

ORDER: IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED granting Turchetta's Motion for Attorney's Fees (Doc. 31 ). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED granting Turchetta's counsel's request for $17,521.25. Further, Turchetta's counsel shall, after the rece ipt of this award, refund to Plaintiff Pauline R. Turchetta the lesser of any fee awarded under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) and any fees awarded under the Equal Access to Justice Act [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah M Fine on 7/10/18. (MAW)

Download PDF
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Pauline R. Turchetta, No. CV-16-3244-PHX-DMF Plaintiff, 10 11 v. 12 Commissioner of Social Security Administration, 13 ORDER Defendant. 14 15 16 Currently pending before the Court is Plaintiff Pauline Turchetta’s Attorney’s 17 Motion for an Award of Attorney’s Fees brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) (Doc. 31). 18 Turchetta’s attorney requests $17,521.25, and contends it is justified by the fee agreement 19 entered into between Turchetta and her attorney on January 20, 2015, and that the amount 20 is reasonable for the services rendered according to the guidelines set out in Gisbrecht v. 21 Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789, 807 (2002). (Doc. 31) Defendant has no objection to this request. 22 (Doc. 32) 23 BACKGROUND 24 Turchetta filed a complaint for judicial review of the Social Security 25 Administration’s determination denying his claim for disability benefits and sought a 26 remand for an award of benefits. (Doc. 1) At the conclusion of briefing, the Court agreed. 27 (Doc. 27) The Court has previously granted Turchetta’s attorney fees under the Equal 28 Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”) in the amount of $6,610.32. (Doc. 30) 1 The Court reviews a contingent-fee arrangement under Section 406(b) to determine 2 whether the amount is reasonable for the services rendered. 3 evaluating the reasonableness of the contingent-fee agreement, after it determines that the 4 amount does not exceed 25% of the award, the Court may consider whether (1) a claimant’s 5 counsel is responsible for delay, or (2) “the benefits are large in comparison to the amount 6 of time spent on the case.” Id. at 808. The Court may review “a record of the hours spent 7 representing the claimant and a statement of the lawyer's normal hourly billing charge for 8 noncontingent-fee cases.” Id. Gisbrecht, supra. In 9 The Court’s independent review concludes that the fees are reasonable. First, there 10 is no suggestion that counsel delayed this matter beyond reasonable requests for additional 11 time to file a reply brief. (Docs. 17, 19) Second, the Court has already approved counsel’s 12 award under EAJA; the Court will not re-examine the hours spent and the normal billing 13 rate. Third, the EAJA offset results in Turchetta actually paying out-of-pocket much less 14 than 25% of past-due benefits. Finally, because civil actions for Social Security disability 15 benefits have a significant risk of loss, the effective hourly rate is not unreasonable. 16 Finally, the Commissioner objected to granting fees for work performed at the 17 administrative level because those fees are only available under Section 406(a). (Doc. 32) 18 The Court notes that the motion is titled as a request for fees under Section 406(b) and was 19 expanded, via footnote, to include Section 406(a). (Doc. 31 at 2, n.2) Although counsel 20 has not used the most explicit method for invoking Section 406(a)’s entitlement to 21 administrative-level fees, the Court will consider the pending Motion as one under 42 22 U.S.C. § 406(a) and (b). 23 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED granting Turchetta’s Motion for Attorney’s Fees 24 (Doc. 31). 25 ... 26 ... 27 ... 28 ... -2- 1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED granting Turchetta’s counsel’s request for 2 $17,521.25. Further, Turchetta’s counsel shall, after the receipt of this award, refund to 3 Plaintiff Pauline R. Turchetta the lesser of any fee awarded under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) and 4 any fees awarded under the Equal Access to Justice Act. 5 Dated this 10th day of July, 2018. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?