Alozie v. Arizona Board of Regents et al

Filing 293

ORDER: IT IS ORDERED Plaintiff Nicholas Alozie's First Motion for Attorney Fees (Doc. 274 ) is GRANTED IN PART. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant Arizona Board of Regents in the amount of $113,161.35. (See Order for details.) Signed by Senior Judge Roslyn O Silver on 11/30/21. (SST)

Download PDF
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Nicholas Alozie, Plaintiff, 10 11 ORDER v. 12 No. CV-16-03944-PHX-ROS Arizona Board of Regents, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Plaintiff Nicholas Alozie is a professor at Arizona State University, a public 16 university governed by Defendant Arizona Board of Regents (collectively, “ASU”).1 17 Alozie brought this matter in 2016, alleging three claims under Title VII of the Civil 18 Rights Act of 1964 and two claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. 1-1). Alozie alleged 19 ASU discriminated and/or retaliated against him as a result of a comment he made during 20 an interview during the dean search for the ASU College of Letters and Sciences. (Doc. 21 1-1 at 3). After the Court granted partial summary judgment in favor of Defendants, the 22 parties proceeded to a jury trial on Alozie’s Title VII retaliation claim. (Doc. 152 at 23). 23 On August 16, 2021, the jury found ASU retaliated against Alozie because of his 24 protected expression, resulting in $357,000 in harm to Alozie. (Doc. 244). 25 On September 8, 2021, Alozie filed a motion seeking $189,519.00 in attorneys’ 26 fees. (Doc. 274 at 1). Defendants filed a response on October 22, arguing Alozie’s 27 counsel are not entitled to the full attorneys’ fees award they seek and instead asking the 28 1 Arizona State University is a non-jural entity. The Arizona Board of Regents is the entity subject to suit pursuant to A.R.S. § 15-1625(B)(3). 1 Court to award Alozie’s counsel $120,602.52. (Doc. 291 at 1). The Court agrees with 2 Defendants that Alozie’s counsel are not entitled to $189,519.00. They will instead be 3 awarded $113,161.35. 4 BACKGROUND 5 Nicholas Alozie is a professor at ASU and has been the head of the Social Science 6 Department at the Polytechnic campus since 2005. (Doc. 22 at 5). In November 2014, 7 Alozie submitted himself for consideration to be dean of the ASU College of Letters and 8 Sciences. (Doc. 137 at 8). Three other faculty members applied for the position: Duane 9 Roen, the interim dean; Fabio Milner, a professor of mathematics and Director of 10 Mathematics for STEM Education; and Joseph Carter, associate dean of ASU’s school of 11 business. (Doc. 137 at 8). Alozie is African-American and originally from Nigeria, 12 Milner is Latino, and Roen and Carter are Caucasian. (Doc. 141 at 17). The fourteen- 13 member search committee determined each of the applicants met the required 14 qualifications for the position and interviewed each applicant. (Doc. 137 at 9). The 15 interviews were held on December 1, 2014 by the committee and the committee chair, 16 Marlene Tromp. 17 Alozie brought a written statement to his interview that he planned to read to the 18 search committee. 19 committee. (Doc. 137 at 9). Rather than permitting Alozie to read his statement aloud, 20 the search committee went straight to its pre-planned questions (Doc. 137 at 9) because 21 no other candidate had the opportunity to provide a similar statement to the committee. 22 (Doc. 277 at 17). Alozie’s statement made clear that he thought the search process was a 23 sham because Roen had already been preselected to be dean. (Doc. 137 at 10). In 24 relevant part, Alozie’s statement explained, 25 26 27 28 (Doc. 137 at 9). He distributed copies of the statement to the I worked with Milt Glick, our former provost, and other top ASU officials to close the ‘Revolving Door’ of minority scholars leaving ASU as quickly as they arrived because they didn’t think the environment was favorable enough to warrant their staying at ASU. The complaint among young minority faculty was that ASU was simply a stopover and for a rewarding career with advancement they had to move to another university. They never saw ASU as a place to build a career. ... -2- 3 Indeed, the word in the College is that there is really no vacancy here, that this Dean’s position has already been promised and that the university is simply going through the motions to dot its i’s and cross its t’s with this hiring process. Thus, I am expected, just like everyone else in the college to back off and let the impending coronation take place. 4 (Doc. 137-1 at 199-200). The statement said Alozie “decided to apply for this position . . 5 . to create a level playing field for women and minorities.” (Doc. 137-1 at 201). The 6 statement then went on to explain why he felt he was qualified, and ended with an 7 expression of gratitude toward the committee for the “opportunity to talk about my 8 eligibility for the position.” (Doc. 137-1 at 202). Alozie verbally asked the committee 9 “not to put a glass ceiling on my career.” (DF 238). 1 2 10 After the interview, some members of the committee felt Alozie “came across as 11 testy, defensive, and aggressive in his interview” and “viewed Plaintiff’s accusation that 12 they had decided on a candidate and were going through the emotions of a search as an 13 attack on their integrity.” (Doc. 137 at 11-12). The record at trial indicated several 14 members of the committee responded poorly to Alozie’s statement. See, e.g., (Doc. 277 15 at 12, 27, 47; DF 520, 3209, 3634). 16 Alozie brought this action in Arizona state court on September 2, 2016. (Doc. 1-1 17 at 19). His complaint raised five claims: (1) race and national origin discrimination under 18 Title VII; (2) retaliation under Title VII; (3) disparate impact under Title VII; (4) 19 violation of his First Amendment rights brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983; and (5) 20 violation of his rights under the Equal Protection Clause under § 1983. (Doc. 22 at 14- 21 19). The Court granted a joint stipulation limiting the scope of Alozie’s discrimination 22 and retaliation claims, and dismissing most of the defendants from the § 1983 claims. 23 (Doc. 117). After the Court granted Defendants’ motion for summary judgment in part, 24 the parties proceeded to trial only on Alozie’s claim that ASU retaliated against him in 25 response to his written statement submitted to the search committee. (Doc. 152 at 23). 26 The jury found in favor of Alozie on the unlawful retaliation claim and awarded 27 damages in the amount of $357,000. (Doc. 244). 28 the damage award to $300,000 pursuant to the statutory cap codified at 42 U.S.C. § -3- On September 1, the Court reduced 1 1981a(b)(3)(D). (Doc. 266 at 2). 2 LEGAL STANDARD 3 The Court may award a reasonable attorney’s fees to the prevailing party in Title 4 VII litigation. 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(k). “[T]he court’s discretion to deny a fee award to a 5 prevailing plaintiff is narrow.” New York Gaslight Club, Inc. v. Carey, 447 U.S. 54, 68 6 (1980). 7 expended in the litigation and must submit evidence in support of those hours worked.” 8 Gates v. Deukmejian, 987 F.2d 1392, 1397 (9th Cir. 1992). The party opposing the 9 motion for attorneys’ fees bears a burden of rebutting “that requires submission of 10 evidence to the district court challenging the accuracy and reasonableness of the hours 11 charged or the facts asserted by the prevailing party in its submitted affidavits.” Id. at 12 1397-98. The Court must provide a “concise but clear explanation” of the reasons behind 13 its fee award. Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424, 437 (1983). The Ninth Circuit 14 requires district courts to “[s]how their work” in calculating fee awards. See Padgett v. 15 Loventhal, 705 F.3d 1205, 1208 (9th Cir. 2013). “The fee applicant bears the burden of documenting the appropriate hours 16 In circumstances, such as this, where a plaintiff has not prevailed on all claims, the 17 Supreme Court has held that the district court may reduce the award of attorneys’ fees as 18 a matter of equitable judgment. See Hensley, 461 U.S. at 436-37. District courts retain 19 this discretion even if the plaintiff’s claims were interrelated, nonfrivolous, and raised in 20 good faith. See id. at 436. Because it is often difficult to determine how many attorney 21 hours were expended on each issue or claim, “the district court should focus on the 22 significance of the overall relief obtained by the plaintiff in relation to the hours 23 reasonably expended on the litigation.” See id. at 435. “There is no precise rule or 24 formula for making these determinations. The district court may attempt to identify 25 specific hours that should be eliminated, or it may simply reduce the award to account for 26 the limited success.” Id. at 436-37. 27 The first step in the attorney fee analysis is to determine the “‘lodestar’ figure, 28 which is the number of hours reasonably expended multiplied by a reasonable hourly -4- 1 rate.” Gates, 987 F.2d at 1397. The Supreme Court has repeatedly held there exists “a 2 ‘strong presumption’ that the lodestar represents the ‘reasonable’” attorney fee. City of 3 Burlington v. Dague, 505 U.S. 557, 562 (1992) (quoting Pennsylvania v. Delaware 4 Valley Citizens’ Council for Clean Air, 478 U.S. 546, 565 (1986)). Nevertheless, the 5 Supreme Court has instructed district courts to “exclude from this initial fee calculation 6 hours that were not ‘reasonably expended.’” Hensley, 461 U.S. at 434 (quoting S. Rep. 7 No. 94-1011, at 6 (1976)). It has also noted, “[h]ours that are not properly billed to one’s 8 client also are not properly billed to one’s adversary.” Id. (quoting Copeland v. Marshall, 9 641 F.2d 880, 891 (1980) (en banc)) (emphasis omitted). 10 ANALYSIS 11 I. 12 Alozie’s counsel seek $189,519.00 in attorneys’ fees. (Doc. 274 at 1). The 13 lodestar figure claimed by Alozie’s counsel will be reduced significantly for the reasons 14 set forth below. 15 Lodestar figure A. Hourly rate 16 Alozie’s counsel seek rates beyond that which they charged their client. They are 17 not entitled to a fee award based on the elevated rates. See Gusman v. Unisys Corp., 986 18 F.2d 1146, 1149-50 (7th Cir. 1993) (“A client who retains a lawyer with an hourly rate of 19 $100, when the average in the community is $150, is entitled to collect from his 20 adversary only $100 for each hour reasonably expended.”). In the absence of “specific 21 evidence” demonstrating entitlement to a fee enhancement, see Perdue v. Kenny A. ex rel. 22 Winn, 559 U.S. 542, 554 (2010), the Court will award prevailing counsel the fee that 23 actually would have been charged to their client under counsel’s retention agreement. 24 The Court considers this a corollary to the Supreme Court’s instruction in Hensley that 25 “[h]ours that are not properly billed to one’s client also are not properly billed to one’s 26 adversary.” Hensley, 461 U.S. at 434 (citation omitted). 27 Thus, although Joshua Carden seeks an hourly fee of $400 per hour (Doc. 274-1 at 28 11), he will be awarded a fee of $350 because that is the hourly rate listed in the -5- 1 contingent fee agreement between Alozie and Carden. (Doc. 274-1 at 8). Although 2 Alozie’s prior counsel, Tod Schleier, seeks $500 per hour, he will be awarded $250 per 3 hour based on the discounted hourly rate that was charged to Alozie pursuant to their fee 4 agreement. (Doc. 274-2 at 5). Although counsel seek $160 per hour for the work 5 completed by Schleier’s paralegal, Cindy Anderson (Doc. 274 at 5), the Court will award 6 only the $80 per hour set forth in the fee agreement. (Doc. 274-2 at 10). 7 All other counsel and paralegals will be awarded the rate they seek because the 8 record does not indicate they seek an enhanced rate. For example, the $125 per hour 9 charged by Carden’s paralegals and the $350, $225, and $135 per hour charged by 10 Michelle Matheson, her associate, and her paralegal, respectively, are reasonable an in 11 conformity with the rate actually charged to Alozie. (Doc. 274-1 at 4, 15). 12 B. Hours expended 13 The exhibits submitted with counsels’ fee application appears to seek an attorney 14 fee award for all hours expended on this litigation. However, because Alozie achieved 15 only partial success—on only one of Alozie’s five claims—the Court will reduce the total 16 number of hours calculated into the lodestar figure. The Court is not required to set forth 17 an hour-by-hour analysis of the fee request. See Gates, 987 F.2d at 1399. It instead “has 18 the authority to make across-the-board percentage cuts either in the number of hours 19 claimed or in the final lodestar figure ‘as a practical means of trimming the fat from a fee 20 application.’” Id. 21 Alozie proceeded to trial and prevailed on only one of his five claims and received 22 roughly half the verdict amount he sought. Based on the exhibits provided, the Court is 23 unable to determine how many of these hours were expended on the victorious claim and 24 how many on the claims that were dismissed. Defendants suggest the attorney hours 25 expended by Alozie’s counsel should be reduced by 15%.2 (Doc. 291 at 8). Left entirely 26 2 27 28 Across-the-board percentage cuts are common in cases where the Plaintiff achieved only partial or limited success. See, e.g., Dunlap v. Liberty Nat’l Prods., Inc., 878 F.3d 794, 799 (9th Cir. 2017) (holding the district court did not abuse its discretion in reducing the attorney fee award by 50% due to limited success); Schwarz v. Secretary of Health & Hum. Servs., 73 F.3d 895, 905 (9th Cir. 1995) (“The court then assumed that 25% of the hours expended by Schwarz’s lawyers to that point were spent entirely on the one -6- 1 to its own inclinations, the Court might reduce the hours expended by more than 15% due 2 to the relatively limited degree of success obtained by Alozie’s counsel because the Court 3 doubts that Alozie’s counsel used 85% of its billed hours on the retaliation claim. 4 However, because of the inherent imprecision in across-the-board percentage cuts, the 5 Court will instead adopt the reasonable and relatively modest 15% reduction suggested 6 by Defendants. 7 C. Lodestar 8 The final lodestar figure, with the above adjustments incorporated, is $113,161.35. 9 II. Further reductions 10 Defendants ask the Court to further reduce the fee by 10% due to Alozie’s limited 11 success. (Doc. 291 at 12). The Court will not do so because it considered Alozie’s 12 partial success in making the 15% reduction in hours. An additional 10% reduction 13 would therefore be duplicative of the analysis in calculating the lodestar figure. Cf. 14 Perdue, 559 U.S. at 553 (“[W]e have noted that ‘the lodestar figure includes most, if not 15 all, of the relevant factors constituting a reasonable attorney’s fee,’ and have held that an 16 enhancement may not be awarded based on a factor that is subsumed in the lodestar 17 calculation.”) (quoting Delaware Valley, 478 U.S. at 566) (internal quotation omitted). 18 Accordingly, 19 IT IS ORDERED Plaintiff Nicholas Alozie’s First Motion for Attorney Fees 20 (Doc. 274) is GRANTED IN PART. 21 … 22 … 23 … 24 … 25 … 26 27 28 remaining claim . . . This approach is entirely consistent with the cases in which we have applied Hensley to hold that a district court does not abuse its discretion when it resorts to a mathematical formula, even a crude one, to reduce the fee award to account for limited success.”). -7- 1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in 2 favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant Arizona Board of Regents in the amount of 3 $113,161.35. 4 Dated this 30th day of November, 2021. 5 6 7 Honorable Roslyn O. Silver Senior United States District Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -8- Date Hours Employee 5/21/2019 1.50 Carden 5/21/2019 3.50 Carden 5/22/2019 6.50 Carden 5/29/2019 0.50 Carden 6/17/2019 3.50 Carden 8/1/2019 6.00 Carden 8/3/2019 1.50 Carden 8/3/2019 6.00 Carden 8/4/2019 10.00 Carden 8/5/2019 10.50 Carden 2/10/2020 1.80 Carden 2/10/2020 1.50 Carden 2/14/2020 3.00 Carden 2/17/2020 1.00 Carden 2/17/2020 0.50 Carden 2/18/2020 0.50 Carden 2/18/2020 1.20 Carden 2/19/2020 3.00 Carden 2/19/2020 2.50 Carden 3/9/2020 3.00 Carden 3/15/2020 1.70 Carden 3/18/2020 2.70 Carden 4/19/2020 0.30 Carden 6/4/2020 0.20 Carden 6/11/2020 0.20 Carden 6/11/2020 0.20 Carden 6/17/2020 0.20 Carden 7/22/2020 0.40 Carden 7/27/2020 0.30 Carden 7/29/2020 0.30 Carden 7/31/2020 0.20 Carden 1/5/2021 0.20 Carden 1/7/2021 0.20 Carden 1/13/2021 0.40 Carden 1/14/2021 0.20 Carden 1/19/2021 0.40 Carden 1/21/2021 0.20 Carden 6/2/2021 0.20 Carden 6/21/2021 0.30 Carden 7/6/2021 1.30 Carden 7/23/2021 2.00 Carden 7/26/2021 1.00 Carden 7/30/2021 2.00 Carden 7/30/2021 6.30 Carden 7/31/2021 4.80 Carden 8/1/2021 3.90 Carden Claimed rate Adjusted hours Adjusted rate Adjusted total 400 1.275 350 446.25 400 2.975 350 1041.25 400 5.525 350 1933.75 400 0.425 350 148.75 400 2.975 350 1041.25 400 5.1 350 1785 400 1.275 350 446.25 400 5.1 350 1785 400 8.5 350 2975 400 8.925 350 3123.75 400 1.53 350 535.5 400 1.275 350 446.25 400 2.55 350 892.5 400 0.85 350 297.5 400 0.425 350 148.75 400 0.425 350 148.75 400 1.02 350 357 400 2.55 350 892.5 400 2.125 350 743.75 400 2.55 350 892.5 400 1.445 350 505.75 400 2.295 350 803.25 400 0.255 350 89.25 400 0.17 350 59.5 400 0.17 350 59.5 400 0.17 350 59.5 400 0.17 350 59.5 400 0.34 350 119 400 0.255 350 89.25 400 0.255 350 89.25 400 0.17 350 59.5 400 0.17 350 59.5 400 0.17 350 59.5 400 0.34 350 119 400 0.17 350 59.5 400 0.34 350 119 400 0.17 350 59.5 400 0.17 350 59.5 400 0.255 350 89.25 400 1.105 350 386.75 400 1.7 350 595 400 0.85 350 297.5 400 1.7 350 595 400 5.355 350 1874.25 400 4.08 350 1428 400 3.315 350 1160.25 8/2/2021 8/3/2021 8/3/2021 8/4/2021 8/5/2021 8/6/2021 8/6/2021 8/10/2021 8/11/2021 8/11/2021 8/12/2021 8/12/2021 8/13/2021 8/16/2021 8/16/2021 8/18/2021 8/27/2021 8/31/2021 9/8/2021 4/17/2020 5/19/2020 5/20/2020 5/28/2020 6/4/2020 6/15/2020 6/15/2020 7/14/2021 7/21/2021 7/28/2021 8/2/2021 8/3/2021 8/4/2021 8/5/2021 8/10/2021 8/11/2021 8/12/2021 8/1/2018 8/2/2018 8/2/2018 8/3/2018 8/3/2018 8/3/2018 8/6/2018 8/6/2018 8/6/2018 8/6/2018 8/6/2018 1.30 0.70 0.30 1.50 0.90 0.60 0.50 0.30 9.00 2.50 8.50 3.50 7.50 2.50 2.50 0.30 0.50 2.50 6.50 0.30 0.40 0.20 0.20 0.30 0.20 0.30 0.30 0.20 0.20 0.20 5.00 0.20 0.30 0.20 2.00 0.30 0.20 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.20 0.10 1.70 0.20 0.10 0.30 1.10 Carden Carden Carden Carden Carden Carden Carden Carden Carden Carden Carden Carden Carden Carden Carden Carden Carden Carden Carden Labadie Labadie Labadie Labadie Labadie Labadie Labadie Lyman Lyman Lyman Lyman Lyman Lyman Lyman Lyman Lyman Lyman T.Schleier T.Schleier T.Schleier T.Schleier T.Schleier T.Schleier Anderson T.Schleier T.Schleier T.Schleier Anderson 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 400 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 500 500 500 500 500 500 160 500 500 500 160 1.105 0.595 0.255 1.275 0.765 0.51 0.425 0.255 7.65 2.125 7.225 2.975 6.375 2.125 2.125 0.255 0.425 2.125 5.525 0.255 0.34 0.17 0.17 0.255 0.17 0.255 0.255 0.17 0.17 0.17 4.25 0.17 0.255 0.17 1.7 0.255 0.17 0.085 0.085 0.085 0.17 0.085 1.445 0.17 0.085 0.255 0.935 350 350 350 350 350 350 350 350 350 350 350 350 350 350 350 350 350 350 350 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 250 250 250 250 250 250 80 250 250 250 80 386.75 208.25 89.25 446.25 267.75 178.5 148.75 89.25 2677.5 743.75 2528.75 1041.25 2231.25 743.75 743.75 89.25 148.75 743.75 1933.75 31.875 42.5 21.25 21.25 31.875 21.25 31.875 31.875 21.25 21.25 21.25 531.25 21.25 31.875 21.25 212.5 31.875 42.5 21.25 21.25 21.25 42.5 21.25 115.6 42.5 21.25 63.75 74.8 8/7/2018 8/7/2018 8/7/2018 8/10/2018 8/10/2018 8/11/2018 8/12/2018 8/13/2018 8/13/2018 8/13/2018 8/13/2018 8/14/2018 8/14/2018 8/14/2018 8/14/2018 8/14/2018 8/14/2018 8/14/2018 8/15/2018 8/15/2018 8/16/2018 8/16/2018 8/20/2018 8/22/2018 8/22/2018 8/22/2018 8/22/2018 8/23/2018 8/23/2018 8/23/2018 8/24/2018 8/28/2018 8/29/2018 8/29/2018 8/29/2018 8/30/2018 8/30/2018 8/30/2018 8/30/2018 8/31/2018 9/4/2018 9/4/2018 9/4/2018 9/4/2018 9/5/2018 9/5/2018 9/5/2018 0.40 0.30 0.40 1.20 0.10 1.80 0.10 0.30 0.40 0.10 0.50 0.30 0.30 0.10 0.40 0.30 0.10 1.40 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.40 0.50 0.10 1.00 0.10 1.50 0.20 0.10 3.30 0.10 1.70 0.10 0.10 1.80 0.10 3.60 0.10 0.10 1.20 0.30 3.10 0.10 0.30 0.20 0.80 1.30 T.Schleier Anderson T.Schleier T.Schleier T.Schleier T.Schleier T.Schleier T.Schleier T.Schleier T.Schleier Anderson Anderson T.Schleier T.Schleier Anderson T.Schleier T.Schleier Anderson T.Schleier Anderson T.Schleier T.Schleier T.Schleier Anderson Anderson T.Schleier Anderson Anderson Anderson Anderson T.Schleier Anderson T.Schleier Anderson Anderson T.Schleier Anderson Anderson Anderson Anderson Anderson Anderson Anderson Anderson T.Schleier Anderson Anderson 500 160 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 160 160 500 500 160 500 500 160 500 160 500 500 500 160 160 500 160 160 160 160 500 160 500 160 160 500 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 500 160 160 0.34 0.255 0.34 1.02 0.085 1.53 0.085 0.255 0.34 0.085 0.425 0.255 0.255 0.085 0.34 0.255 0.085 1.19 0.255 0.34 0.425 0.34 0.425 0.085 0.85 0.085 1.275 0.17 0.085 2.805 0.085 1.445 0.085 0.085 1.53 0.085 3.06 0.085 0.085 1.02 0.255 2.635 0.085 0.255 0.17 0.68 1.105 250 80 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 80 80 250 250 80 250 250 80 250 80 250 250 250 80 80 250 80 80 80 80 250 80 250 80 80 250 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 250 80 80 85 20.4 85 255 21.25 382.5 21.25 63.75 85 21.25 34 20.4 63.75 21.25 27.2 63.75 21.25 95.2 63.75 27.2 106.25 85 106.25 6.8 68 21.25 102 13.6 6.8 224.4 21.25 115.6 21.25 6.8 122.4 21.25 244.8 6.8 6.8 81.6 20.4 210.8 6.8 20.4 42.5 54.4 88.4 9/5/2018 9/5/2018 9/5/2018 9/5/2018 9/7/2018 9/7/2018 9/7/2018 9/7/2018 9/7/2018 9/10/2018 9/10/2018 9/11/2018 9/12/2018 9/12/2018 9/13/2018 9/13/2018 9/13/2018 9/14/2018 9/14/2018 9/14/2018 9/14/2018 9/14/2018 9/15/2018 9/15/2018 9/15/2018 9/17/2018 9/17/2018 9/17/2018 9/18/2018 9/18/2018 9/18/2018 9/19/2018 9/20/2018 9/20/2018 9/20/2018 9/20/2018 9/20/2018 9/20/2018 9/21/2018 9/21/2018 9/21/2018 9/21/2018 9/21/2018 9/21/2018 9/21/2018 9/24/2018 9/24/2018 0.40 0.10 0.60 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.20 3.70 3.80 0.10 0.70 0.20 1.60 0.40 2.70 0.80 0.20 1.10 2.20 0.10 0.40 0.10 0.20 0.10 0.90 1.60 0.20 0.50 0.30 0.70 0.10 0.40 0.10 0.50 1.20 0.40 0.10 0.10 0.30 0.10 1.30 0.10 0.10 2.70 1.50 0.30 Anderson Anderson Anderson Anderson Anderson Anderson T.Schleier Anderson Anderson Anderson T.Schleier Anderson Anderson Anderson Anderson Anderson Anderson Anderson Anderson Anderson T.Schleier T.Schleier T.Schleier T.Schleier T.Schleier Anderson Anderson Anderson T.Schleier Anderson Anderson T.Schleier Anderson T.Schleier Anderson Anderson Anderson T.Schleier Anderson T.Schleier Anderson Anderson Anderson Anderson Anderson Anderson T.Schleier 160 160 160 160 160 160 500 160 160 160 500 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 500 500 500 500 500 160 160 160 500 160 160 500 160 500 160 160 160 500 160 500 160 160 160 160 160 160 500 0.34 0.085 0.51 0.085 0.085 0.085 0.085 0.17 3.145 3.23 0.085 0.595 0.17 1.36 0.34 2.295 0.68 0.17 0.935 1.87 0.085 0.34 0.085 0.17 0.085 0.765 1.36 0.17 0.425 0.255 0.595 0.085 0.34 0.085 0.425 1.02 0.34 0.085 0.085 0.255 0.085 1.105 0.085 0.085 2.295 1.275 0.255 80 80 80 80 80 80 250 80 80 80 250 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 250 250 250 250 250 80 80 80 250 80 80 250 80 250 80 80 80 250 80 250 80 80 80 80 80 80 250 27.2 6.8 40.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 21.25 13.6 251.6 258.4 21.25 47.6 13.6 108.8 27.2 183.6 54.4 13.6 74.8 149.6 21.25 85 21.25 42.5 21.25 61.2 108.8 13.6 106.25 20.4 47.6 21.25 27.2 21.25 34 81.6 27.2 21.25 6.8 63.75 6.8 88.4 6.8 6.8 183.6 102 63.75 9/24/2018 9/24/2018 9/24/2018 9/24/2018 9/25/2018 9/25/2018 9/25/2018 9/25/2018 9/26/2018 9/26/2018 9/26/2018 9/26/2018 9/26/2018 9/26/2018 9/26/2018 9/26/2018 9/26/2018 9/27/2018 9/27/2018 9/27/2018 9/28/2018 9/28/2018 9/30/2018 10/1/2018 10/2/2018 10/2/2018 10/2/2018 10/2/2018 10/2/2018 10/2/2018 10/3/2018 10/3/2018 10/3/2018 10/3/2018 10/3/2018 10/3/2018 10/4/2018 10/4/2018 10/5/2018 10/8/2018 10/8/2018 10/9/2018 10/9/2018 10/9/2018 10/9/2018 10/9/2018 10/9/2018 0.20 0.10 0.10 0.40 0.40 0.50 0.10 0.10 0.40 0.50 0.30 0.10 0.40 0.20 0.30 0.90 1.00 1.40 3.30 0.10 0.10 0.30 0.20 0.20 0.30 0.10 0.10 0.30 1.60 0.30 0.10 0.40 0.10 0.50 0.80 0.20 0.80 0.10 3.00 0.20 5.20 0.20 2.60 0.20 0.20 0.20 2.30 T.Schleier T.Schleier Anderson Anderson T.Schleier T.Schleier Anderson T.Schleier Anderson T.Schleier T.Schleier Anderson Anderson Anderson Anderson Anderson Anderson T.Schleier Anderson Anderson T.Schleier T.Schleier T.Schleier Anderson Anderson Anderson T.Schleier T.Schleier Anderson Anderson Anderson Anderson Anderson Anderson Anderson T.Schleier Anderson T.Schleier Anderson Anderson Anderson Anderson Anderson T.Schleier Anderson Anderson Anderson 500 500 160 160 500 500 160 500 160 500 500 160 160 160 160 160 160 500 160 160 500 500 500 160 160 160 500 500 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 500 160 500 160 160 160 160 160 500 160 160 160 0.17 0.085 0.085 0.34 0.34 0.425 0.085 0.085 0.34 0.425 0.255 0.085 0.34 0.17 0.255 0.765 0.85 1.19 2.805 0.085 0.085 0.255 0.17 0.17 0.255 0.085 0.085 0.255 1.36 0.255 0.085 0.34 0.085 0.425 0.68 0.17 0.68 0.085 2.55 0.17 4.42 0.17 2.21 0.17 0.17 0.17 1.955 250 250 80 80 250 250 80 250 80 250 250 80 80 80 80 80 80 250 80 80 250 250 250 80 80 80 250 250 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 250 80 250 80 80 80 80 80 250 80 80 80 42.5 21.25 6.8 27.2 85 106.25 6.8 21.25 27.2 106.25 63.75 6.8 27.2 13.6 20.4 61.2 68 297.5 224.4 6.8 21.25 63.75 42.5 13.6 20.4 6.8 21.25 63.75 108.8 20.4 6.8 27.2 6.8 34 54.4 42.5 54.4 21.25 204 13.6 353.6 13.6 176.8 42.5 13.6 13.6 156.4 10/10/2018 10/10/2018 10/10/2018 10/10/2018 10/15/2018 10/15/2018 10/15/2018 10/16/2018 10/16/2018 10/16/2018 10/16/2018 10/17/2018 10/17/2018 10/18/2018 10/19/2018 10/22/2018 10/22/2018 10/23/2018 10/23/2018 10/25/2018 10/25/2018 10/25/2018 10/25/2018 10/26/2018 10/26/2018 10/26/2018 10/26/2018 10/26/2018 10/27/2018 10/28/2018 10/28/2018 10/29/2018 10/29/2018 10/29/2018 10/29/2018 10/30/2018 10/30/2018 10/30/2018 10/30/2018 10/30/2018 10/31/2018 10/31/2018 10/31/2018 11/1/2018 11/1/2018 11/1/2018 11/1/2018 0.10 0.10 0.10 3.50 1.30 0.50 4.30 0.20 0.10 0.10 3.70 2.10 1.30 2.70 2.90 0.10 3.60 2.10 1.50 0.30 1.20 0.30 0.70 0.10 3.40 0.10 1.30 0.10 1.10 0.10 1.20 0.20 0.10 3.40 7.50 0.10 0.10 1.10 0.80 2.60 0.70 2.50 5.40 0.30 1.40 1.30 0.50 T.Schleier Anderson Anderson Anderson Anderson Anderson Anderson Anderson Anderson Anderson Anderson Anderson Anderson Anderson Anderson Anderson Anderson Anderson Anderson Anderson T.Schleier Anderson Anderson Anderson Anderson Anderson Anderson T.Schleier T.Schleier T.Schleier T.Schleier Anderson Anderson Anderson T.Schleier Anderson Anderson Anderson T.Schleier Anderson Anderson T.Schleier Anderson T.Schleier Anderson Anderson Anderson 500 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 500 160 160 160 160 160 160 500 500 500 500 160 160 160 500 160 160 160 500 160 160 500 160 500 160 160 160 0.085 0.085 0.085 2.975 1.105 0.425 3.655 0.17 0.085 0.085 3.145 1.785 1.105 2.295 2.465 0.085 3.06 1.785 1.275 0.255 1.02 0.255 0.595 0.085 2.89 0.085 1.105 0.085 0.935 0.085 1.02 0.17 0.085 2.89 6.375 0.085 0.085 0.935 0.68 2.21 0.595 2.125 4.59 0.255 1.19 1.105 0.425 250 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 250 80 80 80 80 80 80 250 250 250 250 80 80 80 250 80 80 80 250 80 80 250 80 250 80 80 80 21.25 6.8 6.8 238 88.4 34 292.4 13.6 6.8 6.8 251.6 142.8 88.4 183.6 197.2 6.8 244.8 142.8 102 20.4 255 20.4 47.6 6.8 231.2 6.8 88.4 21.25 233.75 21.25 255 13.6 6.8 231.2 1593.75 6.8 6.8 74.8 170 176.8 47.6 531.25 367.2 63.75 95.2 88.4 34 11/1/2018 11/1/2018 11/2/2018 11/2/2018 11/2/2018 11/2/2018 11/3/2018 11/5/2018 11/5/2018 11/5/2018 11/5/2018 11/5/2018 11/6/2018 11/6/2018 11/6/2018 11/6/2018 11/7/2018 11/7/2018 11/7/2018 11/7/2018 11/7/2018 11/8/2018 11/8/2018 11/8/2018 11/8/2018 11/9/2019 11/9/2019 11/10/2018 11/12/2018 11/13/2018 11/13/2018 11/13/2018 11/13/2018 11/13/2018 11/13/2018 11/14/2018 11/14/2018 11/14/2018 11/14/2018 11/14/2018 11/14/2018 11/14/2018 11/15/2018 11/15/2018 11/15/2018 11/15/2018 11/15/2018 0.40 0.20 0.10 0.40 2.50 0.70 1.00 1.10 0.20 0.60 0.40 0.80 2.80 3.30 1.80 0.60 0.10 0.10 0.20 2.20 5.40 0.30 1.60 0.70 1.30 2.50 0.20 1.30 1.70 0.20 0.40 1.70 1.40 0.20 0.30 2.10 0.10 0.20 1.60 2.80 0.30 4.20 0.20 0.20 0.10 1.60 1.80 Anderson T.Schleier Anderson T.Schleier T.Schleier Anderson T.Schleier T.Schleier Anderson Anderson T.Schleier T.Schleier Anderson T.Schleier Anderson Anderson T.Schleier T.Schleier Anderson T.Schleier Anderson T.Schleier T.Schleier Anderson T.Schleier Anderson Anderson T.Schleier T.Schleier Anderson Anderson T.Schleier Anderson Anderson T.Schleier T.Schleier T.Schleier Anderson Anderson Anderson T.Schleier T.Schleier Anderson Anderson Anderson Anderson Anderson 160 500 160 500 500 160 500 500 160 160 500 500 160 500 160 160 500 500 160 500 160 500 500 160 500 160 160 500 500 160 160 500 160 160 500 500 500 160 160 160 500 500 160 160 160 160 160 0.34 0.17 0.085 0.34 2.125 0.595 0.85 0.935 0.17 0.51 0.34 0.68 2.38 2.805 1.53 0.51 0.085 0.085 0.17 1.87 4.59 0.255 1.36 0.595 1.105 2.125 0.17 1.105 1.445 0.17 0.34 1.445 1.19 0.17 0.255 1.785 0.085 0.17 1.36 2.38 0.255 3.57 0.17 0.17 0.085 1.36 1.53 80 250 80 250 250 80 250 250 80 80 250 250 80 250 80 80 250 250 80 250 80 250 250 80 250 80 80 250 250 80 80 250 80 80 250 250 250 80 80 80 250 250 80 80 80 80 80 27.2 42.5 6.8 85 531.25 47.6 212.5 233.75 13.6 40.8 85 170 190.4 701.25 122.4 40.8 21.25 21.25 13.6 467.5 367.2 63.75 340 47.6 276.25 170 13.6 276.25 361.25 13.6 27.2 361.25 95.2 13.6 63.75 446.25 21.25 13.6 108.8 190.4 63.75 892.5 13.6 13.6 6.8 108.8 122.4 11/15/2018 11/16/2018 11/16/2018 11/19/2018 11/19/2018 11/19/2018 11/19/2018 11/19/2018 11/19/2018 11/19/2018 11/19/2018 11/20/2018 11/20/2018 11/20/2018 11/20/2018 11/20/2018 11/21/2018 11/21/2018 11/23/2018 11/24/2018 11/26/2018 11/26/2018 11/26/2018 11/27/2018 11/27/2018 11/27/2018 11/27/2018 11/27/2018 11/28/2018 11/28/2018 11/28/2018 11/28/2018 11/28/2018 11/28/2018 11/28/2018 11/28/2018 11/29/2018 11/30/2018 11/30/2018 12/3/2018 12/3/2018 12/3/2018 12/3/2018 12/3/2018 12/4/2018 12/4/2018 12/4/2018 0.60 1.20 1.30 1.30 1.40 1.40 0.20 0.10 1.90 0.10 0.30 1.70 0.10 0.80 0.10 0.20 0.20 0.20 1.10 0.80 0.90 0.20 0.10 0.40 2.00 0.30 1.20 0.30 0.30 0.10 1.20 0.30 1.30 0.40 0.20 1.40 2.60 0.70 1.10 0.40 0.10 0.20 1.40 0.10 0.20 0.10 0.40 Anderson Anderson T.Schleier Anderson Anderson T.Schleier T.Schleier T.Schleier Anderson Anderson Anderson T.Schleier Anderson Anderson Anderson Anderson Anderson Anderson T.Schleier T.Schleier Anderson T.Schleier T.Schleier Anderson T.Schleier Anderson Anderson Anderson Anderson Anderson Anderson T.Schleier Anderson Anderson Anderson Anderson Anderson Anderson T.Schleier Anderson Anderson Anderson T.Schleier T.Schleier T.Schleier T.Schleier Anderson 160 160 500 160 160 500 500 500 160 160 160 500 160 160 160 160 160 160 500 500 160 500 500 160 500 160 160 160 160 160 160 500 160 160 160 160 160 160 500 160 160 160 500 500 500 500 160 0.51 1.02 1.105 1.105 1.19 1.19 0.17 0.085 1.615 0.085 0.255 1.445 0.085 0.68 0.085 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.935 0.68 0.765 0.17 0.085 0.34 1.7 0.255 1.02 0.255 0.255 0.085 1.02 0.255 1.105 0.34 0.17 1.19 2.21 0.595 0.935 0.34 0.085 0.17 1.19 0.085 0.17 0.085 0.34 80 80 250 80 80 250 250 250 80 80 80 250 80 80 80 80 80 80 250 250 80 250 250 80 250 80 80 80 80 80 80 250 80 80 80 80 80 80 250 80 80 80 250 250 250 250 80 40.8 81.6 276.25 88.4 95.2 297.5 42.5 21.25 129.2 6.8 20.4 361.25 6.8 54.4 6.8 13.6 13.6 13.6 233.75 170 61.2 42.5 21.25 27.2 425 20.4 81.6 20.4 20.4 6.8 81.6 63.75 88.4 27.2 13.6 95.2 176.8 47.6 233.75 27.2 6.8 13.6 297.5 21.25 42.5 21.25 27.2 12/4/2018 12/6/2018 12/7/2018 12/7/2018 12/7/2018 12/11/2018 12/11/2018 12/12/2018 12/26/2018 12/26/2018 12/26/2018 12/26/2018 12/27/2018 12/27/2018 12/28/2018 12/28/2018 1/2/2019 1/2/2019 1/2/2019 1/2/2019 1/3/2019 1/3/2019 1/3/2019 1/3/2019 1/5/2019 1/7/2019 1/7/2019 1/7/2019 1/8/2019 1/8/2019 1/8/2019 1/8/2019 1/8/2019 1/9/2019 1/9/2019 1/9/2010 1/9/2019 1/9/2019 1/9/2019 1/10/2019 1/10/2019 1/10/2019 1/10/2019 1/10/2019 1/11/2019 1/11/2019 1/11/2019 0.30 0.90 0.40 0.40 0.10 0.30 0.10 0.70 0.30 0.20 0.20 0.10 0.30 0.10 0.20 0.10 0.40 0.30 0.40 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 1.40 0.50 0.80 1.80 0.50 0.80 0.50 0.40 0.90 0.20 0.40 0.50 3.10 0.10 0.10 0.20 0.80 1.80 0.30 0.20 1.10 0.10 0.20 Anderson Anderson Anderson Anderson Anderson Anderson Anderson Anderson T.Schleier Anderson Anderson T.Schleier T.Schleier Anderson Anderson Anderson Anderson T.Schleier T.Schleier Anderson Anderson T.Schleier T.Schleier Anderson T.Schleier T.Schleier T.Schleier T.Schleier T.Schleier T.Schleier T.Schleier T.Schleier Anderson T.Schleier T.Schleier T.Schleier Anderson Anderson T.Schleier Anderson T.Schleier T.Schleier Anderson T.Schleier T.Schleier Anderson Anderson 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 160 500 160 160 500 500 160 160 160 160 500 500 160 160 500 500 160 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 160 500 500 500 160 160 500 160 500 500 160 500 500 160 160 0.255 0.765 0.34 0.34 0.085 0.255 0.085 0.595 0.255 0.17 0.17 0.085 0.255 0.085 0.17 0.085 0.34 0.255 0.34 0.085 0.085 0.085 0.085 0.085 1.19 0.425 0.68 1.53 0.425 0.68 0.425 0.34 0.765 0.17 0.34 0.425 2.635 0.085 0.085 0.17 0.68 1.53 0.255 0.17 0.935 0.085 0.17 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 80 250 80 80 250 250 80 80 80 80 250 250 80 80 250 250 80 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 80 250 250 250 80 80 250 80 250 250 80 250 250 80 80 20.4 61.2 27.2 27.2 6.8 20.4 6.8 47.6 63.75 13.6 13.6 21.25 63.75 6.8 13.6 6.8 27.2 63.75 85 6.8 6.8 21.25 21.25 6.8 297.5 106.25 170 382.5 106.25 170 106.25 85 61.2 42.5 85 106.25 210.8 6.8 21.25 13.6 170 382.5 20.4 42.5 233.75 6.8 13.6 1/11/2019 1/12/2019 1/12/2019 1/14/2019 1/14/2019 1/15/2019 1/16/2019 1/17/2019 1/18/2019 1/18/2019 1/18/2019 1/18/2019 1/18/2019 1/18/2019 1/21/2019 1/22/2019 1/22/2019 1/23/2019 1/25/2019 1/26/2019 1/28/2019 1/29/2019 1/30/2019 1/30/2019 1/31/2019 1/31/2019 2/1/2019 2/2/2019 2/4/2019 2/5/2019 2/5/2019 2/5/2019 2/5/2019 2/6/2019 2/7/2019 2/7/2019 2/7/2019 2/8/2019 2/8/2019 2/11/2019 2/11/2019 2/11/2019 2/11/2019 2/12/2019 2/12/2019 2/12/2019 2/12/2019 1.00 0.80 1.50 0.90 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.20 0.30 0.10 0.30 0.20 0.10 0.10 0.20 0.10 0.90 1.20 1.80 0.30 2.60 3.70 0.10 0.40 0.60 3.10 2.50 0.20 0.40 0.50 0.10 1.60 0.90 0.80 1.30 0.80 0.60 0.50 0.10 0.30 0.30 0.40 1.80 0.40 0.40 5.30 0.20 T.Schleier T.Schleier T.Schleier T.Schleier T.Schleier Anderson Anderson Anderson T.Schleier Anderson T.Schleier Anderson T.Schleier T.Schleier T.Schleier Anderson Anderson Anderson Anderson T.Schleier Anderson Anderson T.Schleier Anderson T.Schleier Anderson Anderson T.Schleier Anderson Anderson T.Schleier T.Schleier Anderson T.Schleier T.Schleier T.Schleier Anderson T.Schleier T.Schleier T.Schleier Anderson Anderson Anderson T.Schleier Anderson Anderson Anderson 500 500 500 500 500 160 160 160 500 160 500 160 500 500 500 160 160 160 160 500 160 160 500 160 500 160 160 500 160 160 500 500 160 500 500 500 160 500 500 500 160 160 160 500 160 160 160 0.85 0.68 1.275 0.765 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.255 0.085 0.255 0.17 0.085 0.085 0.17 0.085 0.765 1.02 1.53 0.255 2.21 3.145 0.085 0.34 0.51 2.635 2.125 0.17 0.34 0.425 0.085 1.36 0.765 0.68 1.105 0.68 0.51 0.425 0.085 0.255 0.255 0.34 1.53 0.34 0.34 4.505 0.17 250 250 250 250 250 80 80 80 250 80 250 80 250 250 250 80 80 80 80 250 80 80 250 80 250 80 80 250 80 80 250 250 80 250 250 250 80 250 250 250 80 80 80 250 80 80 80 212.5 170 318.75 191.25 42.5 13.6 13.6 13.6 63.75 6.8 63.75 13.6 21.25 21.25 42.5 6.8 61.2 81.6 122.4 63.75 176.8 251.6 21.25 27.2 127.5 210.8 170 42.5 27.2 34 21.25 340 61.2 170 276.25 170 40.8 106.25 21.25 63.75 20.4 27.2 122.4 85 27.2 360.4 13.6 2/12/2019 2/12/2019 2/13/2019 2/13/2019 2/13/2019 2/13/2019 2/13/2019 2/13/2019 2/14/2019 2/14/2019 2/14/2019 2/14/2019 2/14/2019 2/14/2019 2/15/2019 2/17/2019 2/20/2019 2/21/2019 2/21/2019 2/28/2019 2/28/2019 3/3/2019 3/4/2019 3/4/2019 3/4/2019 3/5/2019 3/5/2019 3/5/2019 3/6/2019 3/6/2019 3/12/2019 3/14/2019 3/14/2019 3/14/2019 3/18/2019 3/27/2019 3/2/2019 4/1/2019 4/1/2019 4/2/2019 4/2/2019 4/2/2019 4/26/2019 5/2/2019 8/26/2021 8/26/2021 12/9/2016 0.30 0.20 1.30 0.50 0.50 0.20 0.30 4.50 0.10 0.20 0.10 0.10 0.20 0.40 1.30 1.10 0.60 1.20 1.40 0.20 0.10 0.30 0.20 0.10 0.20 0.80 0.50 1.00 0.80 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 0.30 0.20 0.30 0.80 2.20 1.90 1.30 0.20 0.40 0.50 0.40 1.50 1.00 0.1 Anderson T.Schleier T.Schleier T.Schleier Anderson T.Schleier T.Schleier Anderson Anderson Anderson Anderson T.Schleier T.Schleier Anderson T.Schleier T.Schleier T.Schleier T.Schleier T.Schleier Anderson Anderson T.Schleier Anderson T.Schleier B.Schleier T.Schleier T.Schleier T.Schleier T.Schleier Anderson T.Schleier T.Schleier Anderson T.Schleier Anderson T.Schleier T.Schleier Anderson Anderson Anderson Anderson Anderson T.Schleier Anderson T.Schleier T.Schleier Matheson 160 500 500 500 160 500 500 160 160 160 160 500 500 160 500 500 500 500 500 160 160 500 160 500 212.5 500 500 500 500 160 500 500 160 500 160 500 500 160 160 160 160 160 500 160 500 500 350 0.255 0.17 1.105 0.425 0.425 0.17 0.255 3.825 0.085 0.17 0.085 0.085 0.17 0.34 1.105 0.935 0.51 1.02 1.19 0.17 0.085 0.255 0.17 0.085 0.17 0.68 0.425 0.85 0.68 0.34 0.255 0.17 0.085 0.255 0.17 0.255 0.68 1.87 1.615 1.105 0.17 0.34 0.425 0.34 1.275 0.85 0.085 80 250 250 250 80 250 250 80 80 80 80 250 250 80 250 250 250 250 250 80 80 250 80 250 212.5 250 250 250 250 80 250 250 80 250 80 250 250 80 80 80 80 80 250 80 250 250 350 20.4 42.5 276.25 106.25 34 42.5 63.75 306 6.8 13.6 6.8 21.25 42.5 27.2 276.25 233.75 127.5 255 297.5 13.6 6.8 63.75 13.6 21.25 36.125 170 106.25 212.5 170 27.2 63.75 42.5 6.8 63.75 13.6 63.75 170 149.6 129.2 88.4 13.6 27.2 106.25 27.2 318.75 212.5 29.75 1/12/2017 1/16/2017 1/18/2017 1/18/2017 1/19/2017 1/24/2017 1/25/2017 1/25/2017 2/10/2017 2/14/2017 2/15/2017 2/17/2017 2/19/2017 2/20/2017 2/21/2017 2/23/2017 3/13/2017 3/21/2017 3/23/2017 9/21/2017 10/2/2017 10/2/2017 10/3/2017 10/4/2017 10/5/2017 10/6/2017 10/9/2017 10/11/2017 10/11/2017 10/30/2017 11/2/2017 11/3/2017 11/9/2017 11/10/2017 11/21/2017 12/5/2017 12/14/2017 12/19/2017 12/19/2017 12/20/2017 12/21/2017 12/27/2017 12/28/2017 1/2/2018 1/3/2018 1/3/2018 1/15/2018 0.1 2.7 0.4 0.7 0.7 1.3 0.2 0.3 4.7 4.1 2.7 0.6 1.5 5.1 1.5 2.9 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.7 0.2 0.7 1.9 0.6 0.2 2.2 0.5 0.3 1 0.9 4.1 0.9 1.5 1.1 0.3 0.3 0.2 1 0.1 0.1 2.6 4.7 1.8 0.7 0.5 2.9 0.8 Matheson Armstrong Matheson Armstrong Armstrong Armstrong Matheson Armstrong Armstrong Armstrong Armstrong Matheson Matheson Armstrong Armstrong Armstrong Matheson Matheson Matheson Matheson Matheson Armstrong Armstrong Armstrong Armstrong Armstrong Armstrong Hackett Armstrong Matheson Armstrong Armstrong Armstrong Armstrong Armstrong Matheson Matheson Matheson Matheson Matheson Armstrong Armstrong Armstrong Matheson Matheson Armstrong Matheson 350 250 350 250 250 250 350 250 250 250 250 350 350 250 250 250 350 350 350 350 350 250 250 250 250 250 250 135 250 350 250 250 250 250 250 350 350 350 350 350 250 250 250 350 350 250 350 0.085 2.295 0.34 0.595 0.595 1.105 0.17 0.255 3.995 3.485 2.295 0.51 1.275 4.335 1.275 2.465 0.255 0.085 0.085 0.595 0.17 0.595 1.615 0.51 0.17 1.87 0.425 0.255 0.85 0.765 3.485 0.765 1.275 0.935 0.255 0.255 0.17 0.85 0.085 0.085 2.21 3.995 1.53 0.595 0.425 2.465 0.68 350 250 350 250 250 250 350 250 250 250 250 350 350 250 250 250 350 350 350 350 350 250 250 250 250 250 250 135 250 350 250 250 250 250 250 350 350 350 350 350 250 250 250 350 350 250 350 29.75 573.75 119 148.75 148.75 276.25 59.5 63.75 998.75 871.25 573.75 178.5 446.25 1083.75 318.75 616.25 89.25 29.75 29.75 208.25 59.5 148.75 403.75 127.5 42.5 467.5 106.25 34.425 212.5 267.75 871.25 191.25 318.75 233.75 63.75 89.25 59.5 297.5 29.75 29.75 552.5 998.75 382.5 208.25 148.75 616.25 238 1/19/2018 1/21/2018 1/22/2018 1/24/2018 1/25/2018 1/25/2018 1/26/2018 1/26/2018 1/29/2018 2/8/2018 2/13/2018 2/14/2018 2/15/2018 2/18/2018 2/19/2018 2/21/2018 2/26/2018 2/28/2018 2/28/2018 3/4/2018 3/7/2018 3/8/2018 4/4/2018 4/16/2018 4/23/2018 4/24/2018 4/26/2018 5/11/2018 5/23/2018 5/30/2018 5/31/2018 5/31/2018 6/1/2018 6/1/2018 6/3/2018 6/4/2018 6/4/2018 6/25/2018 6/25/2018 6/28/2018 7/2/2018 7/9/2018 7/12/2018 7/13/2018 7/15/2018 7/23/2018 7/24/2018 2.2 0.2 1.3 0.4 0.1 0.3 1 0.2 1.7 0.2 1.4 3 0.3 3.8 0.5 2.6 0.1 0.3 1.1 0.1 1.5 0.2 0.2 0.2 1.1 0.3 0.2 0.6 3.2 0.7 0.5 2.9 1.5 0.4 2.3 1.3 0.9 0.1 0.2 1.7 2 3.8 5 0.2 0.1 1.1 1.1 Armstrong Matheson Armstrong Armstrong Matheson Armstrong Hackett Armstrong Matheson Matheson Armstrong Armstrong Armstrong Matheson Matheson Armstrong Matheson Matheson Armstrong Matheson Armstrong Matheson Matheson Matheson Armstrong Armstrong Armstrong Matheson Armstrong Matheson Matheson Armstrong Matheson Armstrong Armstrong Matheson Armstrong Matheson Armstrong Armstrong Armstrong Armstrong Matheson Matheson Matheson Matheson Matheson 250 350 250 250 350 250 135 250 350 350 250 250 250 350 350 250 350 350 250 350 250 350 350 350 250 250 250 350 250 350 350 250 350 250 250 350 250 350 250 250 250 250 350 350 350 350 350 1.87 0.17 1.105 0.34 0.085 0.255 0.85 0.17 1.445 0.17 1.19 2.55 0.255 3.23 0.425 2.21 0.085 0.255 0.935 0.085 1.275 0.17 0.17 0.17 0.935 0.255 0.17 0.51 2.72 0.595 0.425 2.465 1.275 0.34 1.955 1.105 0.765 0.085 0.17 1.445 1.7 3.23 4.25 0.17 0.085 0.935 0.935 250 350 250 250 350 250 135 250 350 350 250 250 250 350 350 250 350 350 250 350 250 350 350 350 250 250 250 350 250 350 350 250 350 250 250 350 250 350 250 250 250 250 350 350 350 350 350 467.5 59.5 276.25 85 29.75 63.75 114.75 42.5 505.75 59.5 297.5 637.5 63.75 1130.5 148.75 552.5 29.75 89.25 233.75 29.75 318.75 59.5 59.5 59.5 233.75 63.75 42.5 178.5 680 208.25 148.75 616.25 446.25 85 488.75 386.75 191.25 29.75 42.5 361.25 425 807.5 1487.5 59.5 29.75 327.25 327.25 8/1/2018 0.1 Matheson 1/23/2018 0.3 Matheson Totals 628.00 350 350 0.085 0.255 533.8 350 350 29.75 89.25 113161.35

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?