Alozie v. Arizona Board of Regents et al
Filing
293
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED Plaintiff Nicholas Alozie's First Motion for Attorney Fees (Doc. 274 ) is GRANTED IN PART. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant Arizona Board of Regents in the amount of $113,161.35. (See Order for details.) Signed by Senior Judge Roslyn O Silver on 11/30/21. (SST)
1
WO
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
9
Nicholas Alozie,
Plaintiff,
10
11
ORDER
v.
12
No. CV-16-03944-PHX-ROS
Arizona Board of Regents, et al.,
13
Defendants.
14
15
Plaintiff Nicholas Alozie is a professor at Arizona State University, a public
16
university governed by Defendant Arizona Board of Regents (collectively, “ASU”).1
17
Alozie brought this matter in 2016, alleging three claims under Title VII of the Civil
18
Rights Act of 1964 and two claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. 1-1). Alozie alleged
19
ASU discriminated and/or retaliated against him as a result of a comment he made during
20
an interview during the dean search for the ASU College of Letters and Sciences. (Doc.
21
1-1 at 3). After the Court granted partial summary judgment in favor of Defendants, the
22
parties proceeded to a jury trial on Alozie’s Title VII retaliation claim. (Doc. 152 at 23).
23
On August 16, 2021, the jury found ASU retaliated against Alozie because of his
24
protected expression, resulting in $357,000 in harm to Alozie. (Doc. 244).
25
On September 8, 2021, Alozie filed a motion seeking $189,519.00 in attorneys’
26
fees. (Doc. 274 at 1). Defendants filed a response on October 22, arguing Alozie’s
27
counsel are not entitled to the full attorneys’ fees award they seek and instead asking the
28
1
Arizona State University is a non-jural entity. The Arizona Board of Regents is the
entity subject to suit pursuant to A.R.S. § 15-1625(B)(3).
1
Court to award Alozie’s counsel $120,602.52. (Doc. 291 at 1). The Court agrees with
2
Defendants that Alozie’s counsel are not entitled to $189,519.00. They will instead be
3
awarded $113,161.35.
4
BACKGROUND
5
Nicholas Alozie is a professor at ASU and has been the head of the Social Science
6
Department at the Polytechnic campus since 2005. (Doc. 22 at 5). In November 2014,
7
Alozie submitted himself for consideration to be dean of the ASU College of Letters and
8
Sciences. (Doc. 137 at 8). Three other faculty members applied for the position: Duane
9
Roen, the interim dean; Fabio Milner, a professor of mathematics and Director of
10
Mathematics for STEM Education; and Joseph Carter, associate dean of ASU’s school of
11
business. (Doc. 137 at 8). Alozie is African-American and originally from Nigeria,
12
Milner is Latino, and Roen and Carter are Caucasian. (Doc. 141 at 17). The fourteen-
13
member search committee determined each of the applicants met the required
14
qualifications for the position and interviewed each applicant. (Doc. 137 at 9). The
15
interviews were held on December 1, 2014 by the committee and the committee chair,
16
Marlene Tromp.
17
Alozie brought a written statement to his interview that he planned to read to the
18
search committee.
19
committee. (Doc. 137 at 9). Rather than permitting Alozie to read his statement aloud,
20
the search committee went straight to its pre-planned questions (Doc. 137 at 9) because
21
no other candidate had the opportunity to provide a similar statement to the committee.
22
(Doc. 277 at 17). Alozie’s statement made clear that he thought the search process was a
23
sham because Roen had already been preselected to be dean. (Doc. 137 at 10). In
24
relevant part, Alozie’s statement explained,
25
26
27
28
(Doc. 137 at 9).
He distributed copies of the statement to the
I worked with Milt Glick, our former provost, and other top ASU officials
to close the ‘Revolving Door’ of minority scholars leaving ASU as quickly
as they arrived because they didn’t think the environment was favorable
enough to warrant their staying at ASU. The complaint among young
minority faculty was that ASU was simply a stopover and for a rewarding
career with advancement they had to move to another university. They
never saw ASU as a place to build a career.
...
-2-
3
Indeed, the word in the College is that there is really no vacancy here, that
this Dean’s position has already been promised and that the university is
simply going through the motions to dot its i’s and cross its t’s with this
hiring process. Thus, I am expected, just like everyone else in the college to
back off and let the impending coronation take place.
4
(Doc. 137-1 at 199-200). The statement said Alozie “decided to apply for this position . .
5
. to create a level playing field for women and minorities.” (Doc. 137-1 at 201). The
6
statement then went on to explain why he felt he was qualified, and ended with an
7
expression of gratitude toward the committee for the “opportunity to talk about my
8
eligibility for the position.” (Doc. 137-1 at 202). Alozie verbally asked the committee
9
“not to put a glass ceiling on my career.” (DF 238).
1
2
10
After the interview, some members of the committee felt Alozie “came across as
11
testy, defensive, and aggressive in his interview” and “viewed Plaintiff’s accusation that
12
they had decided on a candidate and were going through the emotions of a search as an
13
attack on their integrity.” (Doc. 137 at 11-12). The record at trial indicated several
14
members of the committee responded poorly to Alozie’s statement. See, e.g., (Doc. 277
15
at 12, 27, 47; DF 520, 3209, 3634).
16
Alozie brought this action in Arizona state court on September 2, 2016. (Doc. 1-1
17
at 19). His complaint raised five claims: (1) race and national origin discrimination under
18
Title VII; (2) retaliation under Title VII; (3) disparate impact under Title VII; (4)
19
violation of his First Amendment rights brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983; and (5)
20
violation of his rights under the Equal Protection Clause under § 1983. (Doc. 22 at 14-
21
19). The Court granted a joint stipulation limiting the scope of Alozie’s discrimination
22
and retaliation claims, and dismissing most of the defendants from the § 1983 claims.
23
(Doc. 117). After the Court granted Defendants’ motion for summary judgment in part,
24
the parties proceeded to trial only on Alozie’s claim that ASU retaliated against him in
25
response to his written statement submitted to the search committee. (Doc. 152 at 23).
26
The jury found in favor of Alozie on the unlawful retaliation claim and awarded
27
damages in the amount of $357,000. (Doc. 244).
28
the damage award to $300,000 pursuant to the statutory cap codified at 42 U.S.C. §
-3-
On September 1, the Court reduced
1
1981a(b)(3)(D). (Doc. 266 at 2).
2
LEGAL STANDARD
3
The Court may award a reasonable attorney’s fees to the prevailing party in Title
4
VII litigation. 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(k). “[T]he court’s discretion to deny a fee award to a
5
prevailing plaintiff is narrow.” New York Gaslight Club, Inc. v. Carey, 447 U.S. 54, 68
6
(1980).
7
expended in the litigation and must submit evidence in support of those hours worked.”
8
Gates v. Deukmejian, 987 F.2d 1392, 1397 (9th Cir. 1992). The party opposing the
9
motion for attorneys’ fees bears a burden of rebutting “that requires submission of
10
evidence to the district court challenging the accuracy and reasonableness of the hours
11
charged or the facts asserted by the prevailing party in its submitted affidavits.” Id. at
12
1397-98. The Court must provide a “concise but clear explanation” of the reasons behind
13
its fee award. Hensley v. Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424, 437 (1983). The Ninth Circuit
14
requires district courts to “[s]how their work” in calculating fee awards. See Padgett v.
15
Loventhal, 705 F.3d 1205, 1208 (9th Cir. 2013).
“The fee applicant bears the burden of documenting the appropriate hours
16
In circumstances, such as this, where a plaintiff has not prevailed on all claims, the
17
Supreme Court has held that the district court may reduce the award of attorneys’ fees as
18
a matter of equitable judgment. See Hensley, 461 U.S. at 436-37. District courts retain
19
this discretion even if the plaintiff’s claims were interrelated, nonfrivolous, and raised in
20
good faith. See id. at 436. Because it is often difficult to determine how many attorney
21
hours were expended on each issue or claim, “the district court should focus on the
22
significance of the overall relief obtained by the plaintiff in relation to the hours
23
reasonably expended on the litigation.” See id. at 435. “There is no precise rule or
24
formula for making these determinations. The district court may attempt to identify
25
specific hours that should be eliminated, or it may simply reduce the award to account for
26
the limited success.” Id. at 436-37.
27
The first step in the attorney fee analysis is to determine the “‘lodestar’ figure,
28
which is the number of hours reasonably expended multiplied by a reasonable hourly
-4-
1
rate.” Gates, 987 F.2d at 1397. The Supreme Court has repeatedly held there exists “a
2
‘strong presumption’ that the lodestar represents the ‘reasonable’” attorney fee. City of
3
Burlington v. Dague, 505 U.S. 557, 562 (1992) (quoting Pennsylvania v. Delaware
4
Valley Citizens’ Council for Clean Air, 478 U.S. 546, 565 (1986)). Nevertheless, the
5
Supreme Court has instructed district courts to “exclude from this initial fee calculation
6
hours that were not ‘reasonably expended.’” Hensley, 461 U.S. at 434 (quoting S. Rep.
7
No. 94-1011, at 6 (1976)). It has also noted, “[h]ours that are not properly billed to one’s
8
client also are not properly billed to one’s adversary.” Id. (quoting Copeland v. Marshall,
9
641 F.2d 880, 891 (1980) (en banc)) (emphasis omitted).
10
ANALYSIS
11
I.
12
Alozie’s counsel seek $189,519.00 in attorneys’ fees. (Doc. 274 at 1). The
13
lodestar figure claimed by Alozie’s counsel will be reduced significantly for the reasons
14
set forth below.
15
Lodestar figure
A. Hourly rate
16
Alozie’s counsel seek rates beyond that which they charged their client. They are
17
not entitled to a fee award based on the elevated rates. See Gusman v. Unisys Corp., 986
18
F.2d 1146, 1149-50 (7th Cir. 1993) (“A client who retains a lawyer with an hourly rate of
19
$100, when the average in the community is $150, is entitled to collect from his
20
adversary only $100 for each hour reasonably expended.”). In the absence of “specific
21
evidence” demonstrating entitlement to a fee enhancement, see Perdue v. Kenny A. ex rel.
22
Winn, 559 U.S. 542, 554 (2010), the Court will award prevailing counsel the fee that
23
actually would have been charged to their client under counsel’s retention agreement.
24
The Court considers this a corollary to the Supreme Court’s instruction in Hensley that
25
“[h]ours that are not properly billed to one’s client also are not properly billed to one’s
26
adversary.” Hensley, 461 U.S. at 434 (citation omitted).
27
Thus, although Joshua Carden seeks an hourly fee of $400 per hour (Doc. 274-1 at
28
11), he will be awarded a fee of $350 because that is the hourly rate listed in the
-5-
1
contingent fee agreement between Alozie and Carden. (Doc. 274-1 at 8). Although
2
Alozie’s prior counsel, Tod Schleier, seeks $500 per hour, he will be awarded $250 per
3
hour based on the discounted hourly rate that was charged to Alozie pursuant to their fee
4
agreement. (Doc. 274-2 at 5). Although counsel seek $160 per hour for the work
5
completed by Schleier’s paralegal, Cindy Anderson (Doc. 274 at 5), the Court will award
6
only the $80 per hour set forth in the fee agreement. (Doc. 274-2 at 10).
7
All other counsel and paralegals will be awarded the rate they seek because the
8
record does not indicate they seek an enhanced rate. For example, the $125 per hour
9
charged by Carden’s paralegals and the $350, $225, and $135 per hour charged by
10
Michelle Matheson, her associate, and her paralegal, respectively, are reasonable an in
11
conformity with the rate actually charged to Alozie. (Doc. 274-1 at 4, 15).
12
B. Hours expended
13
The exhibits submitted with counsels’ fee application appears to seek an attorney
14
fee award for all hours expended on this litigation. However, because Alozie achieved
15
only partial success—on only one of Alozie’s five claims—the Court will reduce the total
16
number of hours calculated into the lodestar figure. The Court is not required to set forth
17
an hour-by-hour analysis of the fee request. See Gates, 987 F.2d at 1399. It instead “has
18
the authority to make across-the-board percentage cuts either in the number of hours
19
claimed or in the final lodestar figure ‘as a practical means of trimming the fat from a fee
20
application.’” Id.
21
Alozie proceeded to trial and prevailed on only one of his five claims and received
22
roughly half the verdict amount he sought. Based on the exhibits provided, the Court is
23
unable to determine how many of these hours were expended on the victorious claim and
24
how many on the claims that were dismissed. Defendants suggest the attorney hours
25
expended by Alozie’s counsel should be reduced by 15%.2 (Doc. 291 at 8). Left entirely
26
2
27
28
Across-the-board percentage cuts are common in cases where the Plaintiff achieved
only partial or limited success. See, e.g., Dunlap v. Liberty Nat’l Prods., Inc., 878 F.3d
794, 799 (9th Cir. 2017) (holding the district court did not abuse its discretion in reducing
the attorney fee award by 50% due to limited success); Schwarz v. Secretary of Health &
Hum. Servs., 73 F.3d 895, 905 (9th Cir. 1995) (“The court then assumed that 25% of the
hours expended by Schwarz’s lawyers to that point were spent entirely on the one
-6-
1
to its own inclinations, the Court might reduce the hours expended by more than 15% due
2
to the relatively limited degree of success obtained by Alozie’s counsel because the Court
3
doubts that Alozie’s counsel used 85% of its billed hours on the retaliation claim.
4
However, because of the inherent imprecision in across-the-board percentage cuts, the
5
Court will instead adopt the reasonable and relatively modest 15% reduction suggested
6
by Defendants.
7
C. Lodestar
8
The final lodestar figure, with the above adjustments incorporated, is $113,161.35.
9
II.
Further reductions
10
Defendants ask the Court to further reduce the fee by 10% due to Alozie’s limited
11
success. (Doc. 291 at 12). The Court will not do so because it considered Alozie’s
12
partial success in making the 15% reduction in hours. An additional 10% reduction
13
would therefore be duplicative of the analysis in calculating the lodestar figure. Cf.
14
Perdue, 559 U.S. at 553 (“[W]e have noted that ‘the lodestar figure includes most, if not
15
all, of the relevant factors constituting a reasonable attorney’s fee,’ and have held that an
16
enhancement may not be awarded based on a factor that is subsumed in the lodestar
17
calculation.”) (quoting Delaware Valley, 478 U.S. at 566) (internal quotation omitted).
18
Accordingly,
19
IT IS ORDERED Plaintiff Nicholas Alozie’s First Motion for Attorney Fees
20
(Doc. 274) is GRANTED IN PART.
21
…
22
…
23
…
24
…
25
…
26
27
28
remaining claim . . . This approach is entirely consistent with the cases in which we have
applied Hensley to hold that a district court does not abuse its discretion when it resorts to
a mathematical formula, even a crude one, to reduce the fee award to account for limited
success.”).
-7-
1
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in
2
favor of Plaintiff and against Defendant Arizona Board of Regents in the amount of
3
$113,161.35.
4
Dated this 30th day of November, 2021.
5
6
7
Honorable Roslyn O. Silver
Senior United States District Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-8-
Date
Hours Employee
5/21/2019
1.50 Carden
5/21/2019
3.50 Carden
5/22/2019
6.50 Carden
5/29/2019
0.50 Carden
6/17/2019
3.50 Carden
8/1/2019
6.00 Carden
8/3/2019
1.50 Carden
8/3/2019
6.00 Carden
8/4/2019 10.00 Carden
8/5/2019 10.50 Carden
2/10/2020
1.80 Carden
2/10/2020
1.50 Carden
2/14/2020
3.00 Carden
2/17/2020
1.00 Carden
2/17/2020
0.50 Carden
2/18/2020
0.50 Carden
2/18/2020
1.20 Carden
2/19/2020
3.00 Carden
2/19/2020
2.50 Carden
3/9/2020
3.00 Carden
3/15/2020
1.70 Carden
3/18/2020
2.70 Carden
4/19/2020
0.30 Carden
6/4/2020
0.20 Carden
6/11/2020
0.20 Carden
6/11/2020
0.20 Carden
6/17/2020
0.20 Carden
7/22/2020
0.40 Carden
7/27/2020
0.30 Carden
7/29/2020
0.30 Carden
7/31/2020
0.20 Carden
1/5/2021
0.20 Carden
1/7/2021
0.20 Carden
1/13/2021
0.40 Carden
1/14/2021
0.20 Carden
1/19/2021
0.40 Carden
1/21/2021
0.20 Carden
6/2/2021
0.20 Carden
6/21/2021
0.30 Carden
7/6/2021
1.30 Carden
7/23/2021
2.00 Carden
7/26/2021
1.00 Carden
7/30/2021
2.00 Carden
7/30/2021
6.30 Carden
7/31/2021
4.80 Carden
8/1/2021
3.90 Carden
Claimed rate Adjusted hours Adjusted rate Adjusted total
400
1.275
350
446.25
400
2.975
350
1041.25
400
5.525
350
1933.75
400
0.425
350
148.75
400
2.975
350
1041.25
400
5.1
350
1785
400
1.275
350
446.25
400
5.1
350
1785
400
8.5
350
2975
400
8.925
350
3123.75
400
1.53
350
535.5
400
1.275
350
446.25
400
2.55
350
892.5
400
0.85
350
297.5
400
0.425
350
148.75
400
0.425
350
148.75
400
1.02
350
357
400
2.55
350
892.5
400
2.125
350
743.75
400
2.55
350
892.5
400
1.445
350
505.75
400
2.295
350
803.25
400
0.255
350
89.25
400
0.17
350
59.5
400
0.17
350
59.5
400
0.17
350
59.5
400
0.17
350
59.5
400
0.34
350
119
400
0.255
350
89.25
400
0.255
350
89.25
400
0.17
350
59.5
400
0.17
350
59.5
400
0.17
350
59.5
400
0.34
350
119
400
0.17
350
59.5
400
0.34
350
119
400
0.17
350
59.5
400
0.17
350
59.5
400
0.255
350
89.25
400
1.105
350
386.75
400
1.7
350
595
400
0.85
350
297.5
400
1.7
350
595
400
5.355
350
1874.25
400
4.08
350
1428
400
3.315
350
1160.25
8/2/2021
8/3/2021
8/3/2021
8/4/2021
8/5/2021
8/6/2021
8/6/2021
8/10/2021
8/11/2021
8/11/2021
8/12/2021
8/12/2021
8/13/2021
8/16/2021
8/16/2021
8/18/2021
8/27/2021
8/31/2021
9/8/2021
4/17/2020
5/19/2020
5/20/2020
5/28/2020
6/4/2020
6/15/2020
6/15/2020
7/14/2021
7/21/2021
7/28/2021
8/2/2021
8/3/2021
8/4/2021
8/5/2021
8/10/2021
8/11/2021
8/12/2021
8/1/2018
8/2/2018
8/2/2018
8/3/2018
8/3/2018
8/3/2018
8/6/2018
8/6/2018
8/6/2018
8/6/2018
8/6/2018
1.30
0.70
0.30
1.50
0.90
0.60
0.50
0.30
9.00
2.50
8.50
3.50
7.50
2.50
2.50
0.30
0.50
2.50
6.50
0.30
0.40
0.20
0.20
0.30
0.20
0.30
0.30
0.20
0.20
0.20
5.00
0.20
0.30
0.20
2.00
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.20
0.10
1.70
0.20
0.10
0.30
1.10
Carden
Carden
Carden
Carden
Carden
Carden
Carden
Carden
Carden
Carden
Carden
Carden
Carden
Carden
Carden
Carden
Carden
Carden
Carden
Labadie
Labadie
Labadie
Labadie
Labadie
Labadie
Labadie
Lyman
Lyman
Lyman
Lyman
Lyman
Lyman
Lyman
Lyman
Lyman
Lyman
T.Schleier
T.Schleier
T.Schleier
T.Schleier
T.Schleier
T.Schleier
Anderson
T.Schleier
T.Schleier
T.Schleier
Anderson
400
400
400
400
400
400
400
400
400
400
400
400
400
400
400
400
400
400
400
125
125
125
125
125
125
125
125
125
125
125
125
125
125
125
125
125
500
500
500
500
500
500
160
500
500
500
160
1.105
0.595
0.255
1.275
0.765
0.51
0.425
0.255
7.65
2.125
7.225
2.975
6.375
2.125
2.125
0.255
0.425
2.125
5.525
0.255
0.34
0.17
0.17
0.255
0.17
0.255
0.255
0.17
0.17
0.17
4.25
0.17
0.255
0.17
1.7
0.255
0.17
0.085
0.085
0.085
0.17
0.085
1.445
0.17
0.085
0.255
0.935
350
350
350
350
350
350
350
350
350
350
350
350
350
350
350
350
350
350
350
125
125
125
125
125
125
125
125
125
125
125
125
125
125
125
125
125
250
250
250
250
250
250
80
250
250
250
80
386.75
208.25
89.25
446.25
267.75
178.5
148.75
89.25
2677.5
743.75
2528.75
1041.25
2231.25
743.75
743.75
89.25
148.75
743.75
1933.75
31.875
42.5
21.25
21.25
31.875
21.25
31.875
31.875
21.25
21.25
21.25
531.25
21.25
31.875
21.25
212.5
31.875
42.5
21.25
21.25
21.25
42.5
21.25
115.6
42.5
21.25
63.75
74.8
8/7/2018
8/7/2018
8/7/2018
8/10/2018
8/10/2018
8/11/2018
8/12/2018
8/13/2018
8/13/2018
8/13/2018
8/13/2018
8/14/2018
8/14/2018
8/14/2018
8/14/2018
8/14/2018
8/14/2018
8/14/2018
8/15/2018
8/15/2018
8/16/2018
8/16/2018
8/20/2018
8/22/2018
8/22/2018
8/22/2018
8/22/2018
8/23/2018
8/23/2018
8/23/2018
8/24/2018
8/28/2018
8/29/2018
8/29/2018
8/29/2018
8/30/2018
8/30/2018
8/30/2018
8/30/2018
8/31/2018
9/4/2018
9/4/2018
9/4/2018
9/4/2018
9/5/2018
9/5/2018
9/5/2018
0.40
0.30
0.40
1.20
0.10
1.80
0.10
0.30
0.40
0.10
0.50
0.30
0.30
0.10
0.40
0.30
0.10
1.40
0.30
0.40
0.50
0.40
0.50
0.10
1.00
0.10
1.50
0.20
0.10
3.30
0.10
1.70
0.10
0.10
1.80
0.10
3.60
0.10
0.10
1.20
0.30
3.10
0.10
0.30
0.20
0.80
1.30
T.Schleier
Anderson
T.Schleier
T.Schleier
T.Schleier
T.Schleier
T.Schleier
T.Schleier
T.Schleier
T.Schleier
Anderson
Anderson
T.Schleier
T.Schleier
Anderson
T.Schleier
T.Schleier
Anderson
T.Schleier
Anderson
T.Schleier
T.Schleier
T.Schleier
Anderson
Anderson
T.Schleier
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
T.Schleier
Anderson
T.Schleier
Anderson
Anderson
T.Schleier
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
T.Schleier
Anderson
Anderson
500
160
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
160
160
500
500
160
500
500
160
500
160
500
500
500
160
160
500
160
160
160
160
500
160
500
160
160
500
160
160
160
160
160
160
160
160
500
160
160
0.34
0.255
0.34
1.02
0.085
1.53
0.085
0.255
0.34
0.085
0.425
0.255
0.255
0.085
0.34
0.255
0.085
1.19
0.255
0.34
0.425
0.34
0.425
0.085
0.85
0.085
1.275
0.17
0.085
2.805
0.085
1.445
0.085
0.085
1.53
0.085
3.06
0.085
0.085
1.02
0.255
2.635
0.085
0.255
0.17
0.68
1.105
250
80
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
80
80
250
250
80
250
250
80
250
80
250
250
250
80
80
250
80
80
80
80
250
80
250
80
80
250
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
250
80
80
85
20.4
85
255
21.25
382.5
21.25
63.75
85
21.25
34
20.4
63.75
21.25
27.2
63.75
21.25
95.2
63.75
27.2
106.25
85
106.25
6.8
68
21.25
102
13.6
6.8
224.4
21.25
115.6
21.25
6.8
122.4
21.25
244.8
6.8
6.8
81.6
20.4
210.8
6.8
20.4
42.5
54.4
88.4
9/5/2018
9/5/2018
9/5/2018
9/5/2018
9/7/2018
9/7/2018
9/7/2018
9/7/2018
9/7/2018
9/10/2018
9/10/2018
9/11/2018
9/12/2018
9/12/2018
9/13/2018
9/13/2018
9/13/2018
9/14/2018
9/14/2018
9/14/2018
9/14/2018
9/14/2018
9/15/2018
9/15/2018
9/15/2018
9/17/2018
9/17/2018
9/17/2018
9/18/2018
9/18/2018
9/18/2018
9/19/2018
9/20/2018
9/20/2018
9/20/2018
9/20/2018
9/20/2018
9/20/2018
9/21/2018
9/21/2018
9/21/2018
9/21/2018
9/21/2018
9/21/2018
9/21/2018
9/24/2018
9/24/2018
0.40
0.10
0.60
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.20
3.70
3.80
0.10
0.70
0.20
1.60
0.40
2.70
0.80
0.20
1.10
2.20
0.10
0.40
0.10
0.20
0.10
0.90
1.60
0.20
0.50
0.30
0.70
0.10
0.40
0.10
0.50
1.20
0.40
0.10
0.10
0.30
0.10
1.30
0.10
0.10
2.70
1.50
0.30
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
T.Schleier
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
T.Schleier
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
T.Schleier
T.Schleier
T.Schleier
T.Schleier
T.Schleier
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
T.Schleier
Anderson
Anderson
T.Schleier
Anderson
T.Schleier
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
T.Schleier
Anderson
T.Schleier
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
T.Schleier
160
160
160
160
160
160
500
160
160
160
500
160
160
160
160
160
160
160
160
160
500
500
500
500
500
160
160
160
500
160
160
500
160
500
160
160
160
500
160
500
160
160
160
160
160
160
500
0.34
0.085
0.51
0.085
0.085
0.085
0.085
0.17
3.145
3.23
0.085
0.595
0.17
1.36
0.34
2.295
0.68
0.17
0.935
1.87
0.085
0.34
0.085
0.17
0.085
0.765
1.36
0.17
0.425
0.255
0.595
0.085
0.34
0.085
0.425
1.02
0.34
0.085
0.085
0.255
0.085
1.105
0.085
0.085
2.295
1.275
0.255
80
80
80
80
80
80
250
80
80
80
250
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
250
250
250
250
250
80
80
80
250
80
80
250
80
250
80
80
80
250
80
250
80
80
80
80
80
80
250
27.2
6.8
40.8
6.8
6.8
6.8
21.25
13.6
251.6
258.4
21.25
47.6
13.6
108.8
27.2
183.6
54.4
13.6
74.8
149.6
21.25
85
21.25
42.5
21.25
61.2
108.8
13.6
106.25
20.4
47.6
21.25
27.2
21.25
34
81.6
27.2
21.25
6.8
63.75
6.8
88.4
6.8
6.8
183.6
102
63.75
9/24/2018
9/24/2018
9/24/2018
9/24/2018
9/25/2018
9/25/2018
9/25/2018
9/25/2018
9/26/2018
9/26/2018
9/26/2018
9/26/2018
9/26/2018
9/26/2018
9/26/2018
9/26/2018
9/26/2018
9/27/2018
9/27/2018
9/27/2018
9/28/2018
9/28/2018
9/30/2018
10/1/2018
10/2/2018
10/2/2018
10/2/2018
10/2/2018
10/2/2018
10/2/2018
10/3/2018
10/3/2018
10/3/2018
10/3/2018
10/3/2018
10/3/2018
10/4/2018
10/4/2018
10/5/2018
10/8/2018
10/8/2018
10/9/2018
10/9/2018
10/9/2018
10/9/2018
10/9/2018
10/9/2018
0.20
0.10
0.10
0.40
0.40
0.50
0.10
0.10
0.40
0.50
0.30
0.10
0.40
0.20
0.30
0.90
1.00
1.40
3.30
0.10
0.10
0.30
0.20
0.20
0.30
0.10
0.10
0.30
1.60
0.30
0.10
0.40
0.10
0.50
0.80
0.20
0.80
0.10
3.00
0.20
5.20
0.20
2.60
0.20
0.20
0.20
2.30
T.Schleier
T.Schleier
Anderson
Anderson
T.Schleier
T.Schleier
Anderson
T.Schleier
Anderson
T.Schleier
T.Schleier
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
T.Schleier
Anderson
Anderson
T.Schleier
T.Schleier
T.Schleier
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
T.Schleier
T.Schleier
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
T.Schleier
Anderson
T.Schleier
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
T.Schleier
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
500
500
160
160
500
500
160
500
160
500
500
160
160
160
160
160
160
500
160
160
500
500
500
160
160
160
500
500
160
160
160
160
160
160
160
500
160
500
160
160
160
160
160
500
160
160
160
0.17
0.085
0.085
0.34
0.34
0.425
0.085
0.085
0.34
0.425
0.255
0.085
0.34
0.17
0.255
0.765
0.85
1.19
2.805
0.085
0.085
0.255
0.17
0.17
0.255
0.085
0.085
0.255
1.36
0.255
0.085
0.34
0.085
0.425
0.68
0.17
0.68
0.085
2.55
0.17
4.42
0.17
2.21
0.17
0.17
0.17
1.955
250
250
80
80
250
250
80
250
80
250
250
80
80
80
80
80
80
250
80
80
250
250
250
80
80
80
250
250
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
250
80
250
80
80
80
80
80
250
80
80
80
42.5
21.25
6.8
27.2
85
106.25
6.8
21.25
27.2
106.25
63.75
6.8
27.2
13.6
20.4
61.2
68
297.5
224.4
6.8
21.25
63.75
42.5
13.6
20.4
6.8
21.25
63.75
108.8
20.4
6.8
27.2
6.8
34
54.4
42.5
54.4
21.25
204
13.6
353.6
13.6
176.8
42.5
13.6
13.6
156.4
10/10/2018
10/10/2018
10/10/2018
10/10/2018
10/15/2018
10/15/2018
10/15/2018
10/16/2018
10/16/2018
10/16/2018
10/16/2018
10/17/2018
10/17/2018
10/18/2018
10/19/2018
10/22/2018
10/22/2018
10/23/2018
10/23/2018
10/25/2018
10/25/2018
10/25/2018
10/25/2018
10/26/2018
10/26/2018
10/26/2018
10/26/2018
10/26/2018
10/27/2018
10/28/2018
10/28/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/29/2018
10/30/2018
10/30/2018
10/30/2018
10/30/2018
10/30/2018
10/31/2018
10/31/2018
10/31/2018
11/1/2018
11/1/2018
11/1/2018
11/1/2018
0.10
0.10
0.10
3.50
1.30
0.50
4.30
0.20
0.10
0.10
3.70
2.10
1.30
2.70
2.90
0.10
3.60
2.10
1.50
0.30
1.20
0.30
0.70
0.10
3.40
0.10
1.30
0.10
1.10
0.10
1.20
0.20
0.10
3.40
7.50
0.10
0.10
1.10
0.80
2.60
0.70
2.50
5.40
0.30
1.40
1.30
0.50
T.Schleier
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
T.Schleier
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
T.Schleier
T.Schleier
T.Schleier
T.Schleier
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
T.Schleier
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
T.Schleier
Anderson
Anderson
T.Schleier
Anderson
T.Schleier
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
500
160
160
160
160
160
160
160
160
160
160
160
160
160
160
160
160
160
160
160
500
160
160
160
160
160
160
500
500
500
500
160
160
160
500
160
160
160
500
160
160
500
160
500
160
160
160
0.085
0.085
0.085
2.975
1.105
0.425
3.655
0.17
0.085
0.085
3.145
1.785
1.105
2.295
2.465
0.085
3.06
1.785
1.275
0.255
1.02
0.255
0.595
0.085
2.89
0.085
1.105
0.085
0.935
0.085
1.02
0.17
0.085
2.89
6.375
0.085
0.085
0.935
0.68
2.21
0.595
2.125
4.59
0.255
1.19
1.105
0.425
250
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
250
80
80
80
80
80
80
250
250
250
250
80
80
80
250
80
80
80
250
80
80
250
80
250
80
80
80
21.25
6.8
6.8
238
88.4
34
292.4
13.6
6.8
6.8
251.6
142.8
88.4
183.6
197.2
6.8
244.8
142.8
102
20.4
255
20.4
47.6
6.8
231.2
6.8
88.4
21.25
233.75
21.25
255
13.6
6.8
231.2
1593.75
6.8
6.8
74.8
170
176.8
47.6
531.25
367.2
63.75
95.2
88.4
34
11/1/2018
11/1/2018
11/2/2018
11/2/2018
11/2/2018
11/2/2018
11/3/2018
11/5/2018
11/5/2018
11/5/2018
11/5/2018
11/5/2018
11/6/2018
11/6/2018
11/6/2018
11/6/2018
11/7/2018
11/7/2018
11/7/2018
11/7/2018
11/7/2018
11/8/2018
11/8/2018
11/8/2018
11/8/2018
11/9/2019
11/9/2019
11/10/2018
11/12/2018
11/13/2018
11/13/2018
11/13/2018
11/13/2018
11/13/2018
11/13/2018
11/14/2018
11/14/2018
11/14/2018
11/14/2018
11/14/2018
11/14/2018
11/14/2018
11/15/2018
11/15/2018
11/15/2018
11/15/2018
11/15/2018
0.40
0.20
0.10
0.40
2.50
0.70
1.00
1.10
0.20
0.60
0.40
0.80
2.80
3.30
1.80
0.60
0.10
0.10
0.20
2.20
5.40
0.30
1.60
0.70
1.30
2.50
0.20
1.30
1.70
0.20
0.40
1.70
1.40
0.20
0.30
2.10
0.10
0.20
1.60
2.80
0.30
4.20
0.20
0.20
0.10
1.60
1.80
Anderson
T.Schleier
Anderson
T.Schleier
T.Schleier
Anderson
T.Schleier
T.Schleier
Anderson
Anderson
T.Schleier
T.Schleier
Anderson
T.Schleier
Anderson
Anderson
T.Schleier
T.Schleier
Anderson
T.Schleier
Anderson
T.Schleier
T.Schleier
Anderson
T.Schleier
Anderson
Anderson
T.Schleier
T.Schleier
Anderson
Anderson
T.Schleier
Anderson
Anderson
T.Schleier
T.Schleier
T.Schleier
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
T.Schleier
T.Schleier
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
160
500
160
500
500
160
500
500
160
160
500
500
160
500
160
160
500
500
160
500
160
500
500
160
500
160
160
500
500
160
160
500
160
160
500
500
500
160
160
160
500
500
160
160
160
160
160
0.34
0.17
0.085
0.34
2.125
0.595
0.85
0.935
0.17
0.51
0.34
0.68
2.38
2.805
1.53
0.51
0.085
0.085
0.17
1.87
4.59
0.255
1.36
0.595
1.105
2.125
0.17
1.105
1.445
0.17
0.34
1.445
1.19
0.17
0.255
1.785
0.085
0.17
1.36
2.38
0.255
3.57
0.17
0.17
0.085
1.36
1.53
80
250
80
250
250
80
250
250
80
80
250
250
80
250
80
80
250
250
80
250
80
250
250
80
250
80
80
250
250
80
80
250
80
80
250
250
250
80
80
80
250
250
80
80
80
80
80
27.2
42.5
6.8
85
531.25
47.6
212.5
233.75
13.6
40.8
85
170
190.4
701.25
122.4
40.8
21.25
21.25
13.6
467.5
367.2
63.75
340
47.6
276.25
170
13.6
276.25
361.25
13.6
27.2
361.25
95.2
13.6
63.75
446.25
21.25
13.6
108.8
190.4
63.75
892.5
13.6
13.6
6.8
108.8
122.4
11/15/2018
11/16/2018
11/16/2018
11/19/2018
11/19/2018
11/19/2018
11/19/2018
11/19/2018
11/19/2018
11/19/2018
11/19/2018
11/20/2018
11/20/2018
11/20/2018
11/20/2018
11/20/2018
11/21/2018
11/21/2018
11/23/2018
11/24/2018
11/26/2018
11/26/2018
11/26/2018
11/27/2018
11/27/2018
11/27/2018
11/27/2018
11/27/2018
11/28/2018
11/28/2018
11/28/2018
11/28/2018
11/28/2018
11/28/2018
11/28/2018
11/28/2018
11/29/2018
11/30/2018
11/30/2018
12/3/2018
12/3/2018
12/3/2018
12/3/2018
12/3/2018
12/4/2018
12/4/2018
12/4/2018
0.60
1.20
1.30
1.30
1.40
1.40
0.20
0.10
1.90
0.10
0.30
1.70
0.10
0.80
0.10
0.20
0.20
0.20
1.10
0.80
0.90
0.20
0.10
0.40
2.00
0.30
1.20
0.30
0.30
0.10
1.20
0.30
1.30
0.40
0.20
1.40
2.60
0.70
1.10
0.40
0.10
0.20
1.40
0.10
0.20
0.10
0.40
Anderson
Anderson
T.Schleier
Anderson
Anderson
T.Schleier
T.Schleier
T.Schleier
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
T.Schleier
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
T.Schleier
T.Schleier
Anderson
T.Schleier
T.Schleier
Anderson
T.Schleier
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
T.Schleier
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
T.Schleier
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
T.Schleier
T.Schleier
T.Schleier
T.Schleier
Anderson
160
160
500
160
160
500
500
500
160
160
160
500
160
160
160
160
160
160
500
500
160
500
500
160
500
160
160
160
160
160
160
500
160
160
160
160
160
160
500
160
160
160
500
500
500
500
160
0.51
1.02
1.105
1.105
1.19
1.19
0.17
0.085
1.615
0.085
0.255
1.445
0.085
0.68
0.085
0.17
0.17
0.17
0.935
0.68
0.765
0.17
0.085
0.34
1.7
0.255
1.02
0.255
0.255
0.085
1.02
0.255
1.105
0.34
0.17
1.19
2.21
0.595
0.935
0.34
0.085
0.17
1.19
0.085
0.17
0.085
0.34
80
80
250
80
80
250
250
250
80
80
80
250
80
80
80
80
80
80
250
250
80
250
250
80
250
80
80
80
80
80
80
250
80
80
80
80
80
80
250
80
80
80
250
250
250
250
80
40.8
81.6
276.25
88.4
95.2
297.5
42.5
21.25
129.2
6.8
20.4
361.25
6.8
54.4
6.8
13.6
13.6
13.6
233.75
170
61.2
42.5
21.25
27.2
425
20.4
81.6
20.4
20.4
6.8
81.6
63.75
88.4
27.2
13.6
95.2
176.8
47.6
233.75
27.2
6.8
13.6
297.5
21.25
42.5
21.25
27.2
12/4/2018
12/6/2018
12/7/2018
12/7/2018
12/7/2018
12/11/2018
12/11/2018
12/12/2018
12/26/2018
12/26/2018
12/26/2018
12/26/2018
12/27/2018
12/27/2018
12/28/2018
12/28/2018
1/2/2019
1/2/2019
1/2/2019
1/2/2019
1/3/2019
1/3/2019
1/3/2019
1/3/2019
1/5/2019
1/7/2019
1/7/2019
1/7/2019
1/8/2019
1/8/2019
1/8/2019
1/8/2019
1/8/2019
1/9/2019
1/9/2019
1/9/2010
1/9/2019
1/9/2019
1/9/2019
1/10/2019
1/10/2019
1/10/2019
1/10/2019
1/10/2019
1/11/2019
1/11/2019
1/11/2019
0.30
0.90
0.40
0.40
0.10
0.30
0.10
0.70
0.30
0.20
0.20
0.10
0.30
0.10
0.20
0.10
0.40
0.30
0.40
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
0.10
1.40
0.50
0.80
1.80
0.50
0.80
0.50
0.40
0.90
0.20
0.40
0.50
3.10
0.10
0.10
0.20
0.80
1.80
0.30
0.20
1.10
0.10
0.20
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
T.Schleier
Anderson
Anderson
T.Schleier
T.Schleier
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
T.Schleier
T.Schleier
Anderson
Anderson
T.Schleier
T.Schleier
Anderson
T.Schleier
T.Schleier
T.Schleier
T.Schleier
T.Schleier
T.Schleier
T.Schleier
T.Schleier
Anderson
T.Schleier
T.Schleier
T.Schleier
Anderson
Anderson
T.Schleier
Anderson
T.Schleier
T.Schleier
Anderson
T.Schleier
T.Schleier
Anderson
Anderson
160
160
160
160
160
160
160
160
500
160
160
500
500
160
160
160
160
500
500
160
160
500
500
160
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
500
160
500
500
500
160
160
500
160
500
500
160
500
500
160
160
0.255
0.765
0.34
0.34
0.085
0.255
0.085
0.595
0.255
0.17
0.17
0.085
0.255
0.085
0.17
0.085
0.34
0.255
0.34
0.085
0.085
0.085
0.085
0.085
1.19
0.425
0.68
1.53
0.425
0.68
0.425
0.34
0.765
0.17
0.34
0.425
2.635
0.085
0.085
0.17
0.68
1.53
0.255
0.17
0.935
0.085
0.17
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
80
250
80
80
250
250
80
80
80
80
250
250
80
80
250
250
80
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
250
80
250
250
250
80
80
250
80
250
250
80
250
250
80
80
20.4
61.2
27.2
27.2
6.8
20.4
6.8
47.6
63.75
13.6
13.6
21.25
63.75
6.8
13.6
6.8
27.2
63.75
85
6.8
6.8
21.25
21.25
6.8
297.5
106.25
170
382.5
106.25
170
106.25
85
61.2
42.5
85
106.25
210.8
6.8
21.25
13.6
170
382.5
20.4
42.5
233.75
6.8
13.6
1/11/2019
1/12/2019
1/12/2019
1/14/2019
1/14/2019
1/15/2019
1/16/2019
1/17/2019
1/18/2019
1/18/2019
1/18/2019
1/18/2019
1/18/2019
1/18/2019
1/21/2019
1/22/2019
1/22/2019
1/23/2019
1/25/2019
1/26/2019
1/28/2019
1/29/2019
1/30/2019
1/30/2019
1/31/2019
1/31/2019
2/1/2019
2/2/2019
2/4/2019
2/5/2019
2/5/2019
2/5/2019
2/5/2019
2/6/2019
2/7/2019
2/7/2019
2/7/2019
2/8/2019
2/8/2019
2/11/2019
2/11/2019
2/11/2019
2/11/2019
2/12/2019
2/12/2019
2/12/2019
2/12/2019
1.00
0.80
1.50
0.90
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.30
0.10
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.10
0.20
0.10
0.90
1.20
1.80
0.30
2.60
3.70
0.10
0.40
0.60
3.10
2.50
0.20
0.40
0.50
0.10
1.60
0.90
0.80
1.30
0.80
0.60
0.50
0.10
0.30
0.30
0.40
1.80
0.40
0.40
5.30
0.20
T.Schleier
T.Schleier
T.Schleier
T.Schleier
T.Schleier
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
T.Schleier
Anderson
T.Schleier
Anderson
T.Schleier
T.Schleier
T.Schleier
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
T.Schleier
Anderson
Anderson
T.Schleier
Anderson
T.Schleier
Anderson
Anderson
T.Schleier
Anderson
Anderson
T.Schleier
T.Schleier
Anderson
T.Schleier
T.Schleier
T.Schleier
Anderson
T.Schleier
T.Schleier
T.Schleier
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
T.Schleier
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
500
500
500
500
500
160
160
160
500
160
500
160
500
500
500
160
160
160
160
500
160
160
500
160
500
160
160
500
160
160
500
500
160
500
500
500
160
500
500
500
160
160
160
500
160
160
160
0.85
0.68
1.275
0.765
0.17
0.17
0.17
0.17
0.255
0.085
0.255
0.17
0.085
0.085
0.17
0.085
0.765
1.02
1.53
0.255
2.21
3.145
0.085
0.34
0.51
2.635
2.125
0.17
0.34
0.425
0.085
1.36
0.765
0.68
1.105
0.68
0.51
0.425
0.085
0.255
0.255
0.34
1.53
0.34
0.34
4.505
0.17
250
250
250
250
250
80
80
80
250
80
250
80
250
250
250
80
80
80
80
250
80
80
250
80
250
80
80
250
80
80
250
250
80
250
250
250
80
250
250
250
80
80
80
250
80
80
80
212.5
170
318.75
191.25
42.5
13.6
13.6
13.6
63.75
6.8
63.75
13.6
21.25
21.25
42.5
6.8
61.2
81.6
122.4
63.75
176.8
251.6
21.25
27.2
127.5
210.8
170
42.5
27.2
34
21.25
340
61.2
170
276.25
170
40.8
106.25
21.25
63.75
20.4
27.2
122.4
85
27.2
360.4
13.6
2/12/2019
2/12/2019
2/13/2019
2/13/2019
2/13/2019
2/13/2019
2/13/2019
2/13/2019
2/14/2019
2/14/2019
2/14/2019
2/14/2019
2/14/2019
2/14/2019
2/15/2019
2/17/2019
2/20/2019
2/21/2019
2/21/2019
2/28/2019
2/28/2019
3/3/2019
3/4/2019
3/4/2019
3/4/2019
3/5/2019
3/5/2019
3/5/2019
3/6/2019
3/6/2019
3/12/2019
3/14/2019
3/14/2019
3/14/2019
3/18/2019
3/27/2019
3/2/2019
4/1/2019
4/1/2019
4/2/2019
4/2/2019
4/2/2019
4/26/2019
5/2/2019
8/26/2021
8/26/2021
12/9/2016
0.30
0.20
1.30
0.50
0.50
0.20
0.30
4.50
0.10
0.20
0.10
0.10
0.20
0.40
1.30
1.10
0.60
1.20
1.40
0.20
0.10
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.20
0.80
0.50
1.00
0.80
0.40
0.30
0.20
0.10
0.30
0.20
0.30
0.80
2.20
1.90
1.30
0.20
0.40
0.50
0.40
1.50
1.00
0.1
Anderson
T.Schleier
T.Schleier
T.Schleier
Anderson
T.Schleier
T.Schleier
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
T.Schleier
T.Schleier
Anderson
T.Schleier
T.Schleier
T.Schleier
T.Schleier
T.Schleier
Anderson
Anderson
T.Schleier
Anderson
T.Schleier
B.Schleier
T.Schleier
T.Schleier
T.Schleier
T.Schleier
Anderson
T.Schleier
T.Schleier
Anderson
T.Schleier
Anderson
T.Schleier
T.Schleier
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
Anderson
T.Schleier
Anderson
T.Schleier
T.Schleier
Matheson
160
500
500
500
160
500
500
160
160
160
160
500
500
160
500
500
500
500
500
160
160
500
160
500
212.5
500
500
500
500
160
500
500
160
500
160
500
500
160
160
160
160
160
500
160
500
500
350
0.255
0.17
1.105
0.425
0.425
0.17
0.255
3.825
0.085
0.17
0.085
0.085
0.17
0.34
1.105
0.935
0.51
1.02
1.19
0.17
0.085
0.255
0.17
0.085
0.17
0.68
0.425
0.85
0.68
0.34
0.255
0.17
0.085
0.255
0.17
0.255
0.68
1.87
1.615
1.105
0.17
0.34
0.425
0.34
1.275
0.85
0.085
80
250
250
250
80
250
250
80
80
80
80
250
250
80
250
250
250
250
250
80
80
250
80
250
212.5
250
250
250
250
80
250
250
80
250
80
250
250
80
80
80
80
80
250
80
250
250
350
20.4
42.5
276.25
106.25
34
42.5
63.75
306
6.8
13.6
6.8
21.25
42.5
27.2
276.25
233.75
127.5
255
297.5
13.6
6.8
63.75
13.6
21.25
36.125
170
106.25
212.5
170
27.2
63.75
42.5
6.8
63.75
13.6
63.75
170
149.6
129.2
88.4
13.6
27.2
106.25
27.2
318.75
212.5
29.75
1/12/2017
1/16/2017
1/18/2017
1/18/2017
1/19/2017
1/24/2017
1/25/2017
1/25/2017
2/10/2017
2/14/2017
2/15/2017
2/17/2017
2/19/2017
2/20/2017
2/21/2017
2/23/2017
3/13/2017
3/21/2017
3/23/2017
9/21/2017
10/2/2017
10/2/2017
10/3/2017
10/4/2017
10/5/2017
10/6/2017
10/9/2017
10/11/2017
10/11/2017
10/30/2017
11/2/2017
11/3/2017
11/9/2017
11/10/2017
11/21/2017
12/5/2017
12/14/2017
12/19/2017
12/19/2017
12/20/2017
12/21/2017
12/27/2017
12/28/2017
1/2/2018
1/3/2018
1/3/2018
1/15/2018
0.1
2.7
0.4
0.7
0.7
1.3
0.2
0.3
4.7
4.1
2.7
0.6
1.5
5.1
1.5
2.9
0.3
0.1
0.1
0.7
0.2
0.7
1.9
0.6
0.2
2.2
0.5
0.3
1
0.9
4.1
0.9
1.5
1.1
0.3
0.3
0.2
1
0.1
0.1
2.6
4.7
1.8
0.7
0.5
2.9
0.8
Matheson
Armstrong
Matheson
Armstrong
Armstrong
Armstrong
Matheson
Armstrong
Armstrong
Armstrong
Armstrong
Matheson
Matheson
Armstrong
Armstrong
Armstrong
Matheson
Matheson
Matheson
Matheson
Matheson
Armstrong
Armstrong
Armstrong
Armstrong
Armstrong
Armstrong
Hackett
Armstrong
Matheson
Armstrong
Armstrong
Armstrong
Armstrong
Armstrong
Matheson
Matheson
Matheson
Matheson
Matheson
Armstrong
Armstrong
Armstrong
Matheson
Matheson
Armstrong
Matheson
350
250
350
250
250
250
350
250
250
250
250
350
350
250
250
250
350
350
350
350
350
250
250
250
250
250
250
135
250
350
250
250
250
250
250
350
350
350
350
350
250
250
250
350
350
250
350
0.085
2.295
0.34
0.595
0.595
1.105
0.17
0.255
3.995
3.485
2.295
0.51
1.275
4.335
1.275
2.465
0.255
0.085
0.085
0.595
0.17
0.595
1.615
0.51
0.17
1.87
0.425
0.255
0.85
0.765
3.485
0.765
1.275
0.935
0.255
0.255
0.17
0.85
0.085
0.085
2.21
3.995
1.53
0.595
0.425
2.465
0.68
350
250
350
250
250
250
350
250
250
250
250
350
350
250
250
250
350
350
350
350
350
250
250
250
250
250
250
135
250
350
250
250
250
250
250
350
350
350
350
350
250
250
250
350
350
250
350
29.75
573.75
119
148.75
148.75
276.25
59.5
63.75
998.75
871.25
573.75
178.5
446.25
1083.75
318.75
616.25
89.25
29.75
29.75
208.25
59.5
148.75
403.75
127.5
42.5
467.5
106.25
34.425
212.5
267.75
871.25
191.25
318.75
233.75
63.75
89.25
59.5
297.5
29.75
29.75
552.5
998.75
382.5
208.25
148.75
616.25
238
1/19/2018
1/21/2018
1/22/2018
1/24/2018
1/25/2018
1/25/2018
1/26/2018
1/26/2018
1/29/2018
2/8/2018
2/13/2018
2/14/2018
2/15/2018
2/18/2018
2/19/2018
2/21/2018
2/26/2018
2/28/2018
2/28/2018
3/4/2018
3/7/2018
3/8/2018
4/4/2018
4/16/2018
4/23/2018
4/24/2018
4/26/2018
5/11/2018
5/23/2018
5/30/2018
5/31/2018
5/31/2018
6/1/2018
6/1/2018
6/3/2018
6/4/2018
6/4/2018
6/25/2018
6/25/2018
6/28/2018
7/2/2018
7/9/2018
7/12/2018
7/13/2018
7/15/2018
7/23/2018
7/24/2018
2.2
0.2
1.3
0.4
0.1
0.3
1
0.2
1.7
0.2
1.4
3
0.3
3.8
0.5
2.6
0.1
0.3
1.1
0.1
1.5
0.2
0.2
0.2
1.1
0.3
0.2
0.6
3.2
0.7
0.5
2.9
1.5
0.4
2.3
1.3
0.9
0.1
0.2
1.7
2
3.8
5
0.2
0.1
1.1
1.1
Armstrong
Matheson
Armstrong
Armstrong
Matheson
Armstrong
Hackett
Armstrong
Matheson
Matheson
Armstrong
Armstrong
Armstrong
Matheson
Matheson
Armstrong
Matheson
Matheson
Armstrong
Matheson
Armstrong
Matheson
Matheson
Matheson
Armstrong
Armstrong
Armstrong
Matheson
Armstrong
Matheson
Matheson
Armstrong
Matheson
Armstrong
Armstrong
Matheson
Armstrong
Matheson
Armstrong
Armstrong
Armstrong
Armstrong
Matheson
Matheson
Matheson
Matheson
Matheson
250
350
250
250
350
250
135
250
350
350
250
250
250
350
350
250
350
350
250
350
250
350
350
350
250
250
250
350
250
350
350
250
350
250
250
350
250
350
250
250
250
250
350
350
350
350
350
1.87
0.17
1.105
0.34
0.085
0.255
0.85
0.17
1.445
0.17
1.19
2.55
0.255
3.23
0.425
2.21
0.085
0.255
0.935
0.085
1.275
0.17
0.17
0.17
0.935
0.255
0.17
0.51
2.72
0.595
0.425
2.465
1.275
0.34
1.955
1.105
0.765
0.085
0.17
1.445
1.7
3.23
4.25
0.17
0.085
0.935
0.935
250
350
250
250
350
250
135
250
350
350
250
250
250
350
350
250
350
350
250
350
250
350
350
350
250
250
250
350
250
350
350
250
350
250
250
350
250
350
250
250
250
250
350
350
350
350
350
467.5
59.5
276.25
85
29.75
63.75
114.75
42.5
505.75
59.5
297.5
637.5
63.75
1130.5
148.75
552.5
29.75
89.25
233.75
29.75
318.75
59.5
59.5
59.5
233.75
63.75
42.5
178.5
680
208.25
148.75
616.25
446.25
85
488.75
386.75
191.25
29.75
42.5
361.25
425
807.5
1487.5
59.5
29.75
327.25
327.25
8/1/2018
0.1 Matheson
1/23/2018
0.3 Matheson
Totals
628.00
350
350
0.085
0.255
533.8
350
350
29.75
89.25
113161.35
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?