Muktar v. Gurule

Filing 16

ORDER ADOPTING 15 Magistrate Judge Fine's Report and Recommendation. Petitioner's Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1 ) is DENIED. The Clerk shall TERMINATE this action and enter judgment. Because this case arises under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, no ruling on a certificate of appealability is required. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 6/2/17. (LSP)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Mohammed Muktar, Petitioner, 10 11 ORDER v. 12 No. CV-16-04028-PHX-GMS Jon Gurule, 13 Respondent. 14 15 16 Pending before the Court are Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and 17 United States Magistrate Judge Deborah M. Fine’s Report and Recommendation 18 (“R&R”). Docs. 1, 15. The R&R recommends that the Court deny the Petition. Doc. 15 19 at 9. The Magistrate Judge advised the parties that they had fourteen (14) days to file 20 objections to the R&R and that failure to file timely objections could be considered a 21 waiver of the right to obtain review of the R&R. Id. at 9 (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 72; 22 United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003)). 23 The parties did not file objections, which relieves the Court of its obligation to 24 review the R&R. See Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d at 1121; Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 25 (1985) (“[Section 636(b)(1)] does not . . . require any review at all . . . of any issue that is 26 not the subject of an objection.”); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) (“The district judge must 27 determine de novo any part of the magistrate judge’s disposition that has been properly 28 objected to.”). The Court has nonetheless reviewed the R&R and finds that it is well- 1 taken. The Court will accept the R&R and deny the Petition. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) 2 (stating that the district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the 3 findings or recommendations made by the magistrate”); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) (“The 4 district judge may accept, reject, or modify the recommended disposition; receive further 5 evidence; or return the matter to the magistrate judge with instructions.”). 6 IT IS ORDERED: 7 1. Magistrate Judge Fine’s R&R (Doc. 15) is ACCEPTED. 8 2. Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) is DENIED. 9 3. The Clerk of Court shall TERMINATE this action and enter judgment 10 11 12 13 accordingly. 4. Because this case arises under 28 U.S.C. § 2241, no ruling on a certificate of appealability is required. Dated this 2nd day of June, 2017. 14 15 16 Honorable G. Murray Snow United States District Judge 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?