Kual-Arob #220188 v. Ryan et al
Filing
37
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re: 36 Report and Recommendation. Petitioner's Amended Petition Under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody (Doc. 15 ) is denied and that this action is dism issed with prejudice. A Certificate of Appealability shall not issue and that leave to appeal in forma pauperis is denied because the dismissal of the petitioners amended habeas petition is justified by a plain procedural bar and reasonable jurists would not find the ruling debatable. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Senior Judge Paul G Rosenblatt on 9/22/17. (DXD)
1
WO
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
9
10
Makale Deng Kual-Arob,
Petitioner,
11
12
13
vs.
Charles L. Ryan, et al.,
Respondents.
14
15
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. CV-17-00419-PHX-PGR (JFM)
ORDER
16
Having reviewed de novo the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate
17
Judge Metcalf notwithstanding that no party has filed any objections to the Report
18
and Recommendation and the time for doing so has expired, the Court finds that the
19
Magistrate Judge correctly concluded that the petitioner’s amended habeas petition,
20
filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, should be dismissed because the petitioner has
21
procedurally defaulted his state remedies on all of his grounds for relief, and he has
22
failed to show any cause or actual innocence to excuse his procedural defaults.
23
Therefore,
24
25
26
IT IS ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation
(Doc. 36) is accepted and adopted by the Court.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petitioner’s Amended Petition Under 28
1
U.S.C. § 2254 for a Writ of Habeas Corpus by a Person in State Custody (Doc. 15)
2
is denied and that this action is dismissed with prejudice.
3
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a Certificate of Appealability shall not issue
4
and that leave to appeal in forma pauperis is denied because the dismissal of the
5
petitioner’s amended habeas petition is justified by a plain procedural bar and
6
reasonable jurists would not find the ruling debatable.
7
8
9
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment
accordingly.
DATED this 22nd day of September, 2017.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?