Strobel et al v. Pinal County Sheriff's Office et al

Filing 30

ORDER denying Plaintiff's 27 Motion for Reconsideration. Signed by Magistrate Judge Eileen S Willett on 4/12/2018. (ATD)

Download PDF
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Scott Strobel, et al., Plaintiffs, 10 11 ORDER v. 12 No. CV-17-01578-PHX-ESW Pinal County Sheriff's Office, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 On March 8, 2018, the Court issued an Order (Doc. 24) granting in part and 16 denying in part Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Doc. 14). Thirty days later, on April 9, 17 2018, Plaintiffs move for reconsideration of that Order. (Doc. 27). 18 Local Rule of Civil Procedure 7.2(g)(2) provides that “[a]bsent good cause 19 shown, any motion for reconsideration shall be filed not later than fourteen (14) days 20 after the date of the filing of the Order that is the subject of the motion.” The 21 Court does not find that Plaintiffs have shown good cause for filing the Motion for 22 Reconsideration (Doc. 27) more than fourteen days after the Court issued its Order (Doc. 23 24). The Motion (Doc. 27) therefore will be denied as untimely. Moreover, the Court 24 notes that Plaintiff has timely filed a Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 26) reasserting 25 the claims dismissed without prejudice in the Court’s Order (Doc. 24). 26 Accordingly, 27 IT IS ORDERED denying Plaintiffs’ Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. 27). 28 Dated this 12th day of April, 2018.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?