Carson #091914 v. Ryan et al

Filing 214

ORDER: The Report and Recommendation 163 is ADOPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED: The October 19, 2017, screening order applies to Counts One through Thirteen of the Amended Complaint, and the Amended Complaint does not revive any claims that the Court p reviously dismissed. Counts Seventeen, Eighteen, Nineteen, and Twenty, are DISMISSED. The claims against Defendant Ryan that are alleged in Counts Fourteen, Fifteen, and Sixteen are DISMISSED. Defendant Hernandez shall answer Count Fourteen, Defendan t Erwin shall answer Count Fifteen, and Defendant Ulibarri shall answer Count Sixteen. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion for Reconsideration 212 is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge should direct service on any newly named defendant and issue a scheduling order to govern the disposition of the new claims. Signed by Senior Judge Roslyn O Silver on 10/03/2018. (REK)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

8
9

Phillip Lee Carson,
Plaintiff,

10
11

ORDER

v.

12

No. CV-17-01641-PHX-ROS (BSB)

Charles L Ryan, et al.,

13

Defendants.

14
On July 13, 2018, Magistrate Judge Bridget S. Bade issued a Report and

15
16

Recommendation (“R&R”) regarding Plaintiff’s Amended Complaint.

(Doc. 163).

17

Plaintiff did not file any objections to the R&R. Therefore, the R&R will be adopted in

18

full.

19

Accordingly,

20

IT IS ORDERED the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 163) is ADOPTED.

21

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED as follows:

22

1. The October 19, 2017, screening order applies to Counts One through Thirteen of

23

the Amended Complaint, and the Amended Complaint does not revive any claims

24

that the Court previously dismissed.

25

2. Counts Seventeen, Eighteen, Nineteen, and Twenty, are DISMISSED.

The

26

claims against Defendant Ryan that are alleged in Counts Fourteen, Fifteen, and

27

Sixteen are DISMISSED.

28

3. Defendant Hernandez shall answer Count Fourteen, Defendant Erwin shall answer

1

Count Fifteen, and Defendant Ulibarri shall answer Count Sixteen.

2

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. 212) is

3

DENIED.

4

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED the Magistrate Judge should direct service on any

5

newly named defendant and issue a scheduling order to govern the disposition of the new

6

claims.

7

Dated this 3rd day of October, 2018.

8
9
10

Honorable Roslyn O. Silver
Senior United States District Judge

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-2-