VFS Leasing Company v. Universal Investments Group LLC et al
Filing
45
ORDER denying 36 Plaintiff's Motion for Entry of Default Judgment without prejudice. Signed by Judge John J Tuchi on 3/20/18. (EJA)
1
WO
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
9
VFS Leasing Company,
Plaintiff,
10
11
ORDER
v.
12
No. CV-17-03240-PHX-JJT
Universal Investments Group LLC, et al.,
13
Defendants.
14
15
At issue is Plaintiff’s Motion for Entry of Default Judgment (Doc. 36). According
16
to Plaintiff’s filed certificates of service, Defendants Universal Investments Group, LLC;
17
JMR Express, LLC; and SHG Universal, LLC have each been served with summons and
18
a copy of the Complaint in this matter. (Docs. 14, 15, 17.) None of the three named
19
Defendants have answered or otherwise appeared.
20
Plaintiff filed an Application for Entry of Default against the three named
21
Defendants (Docs. 22, 23, 24) and on November 20, 2017, the Clerk entered default in
22
accordance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 55(a), against Defendants
23
Universal Investments Group, LLC; JMR Express, LLC, and SHG Universal, LLC1
24
(Doc. 26).
25
26
27
28
1
Plaintiff had also filed an Application for Entry of Default as to Defendant Edy
Bujanda (Doc. 21). Defendant Bujanda was named in the Clerk’s Entry of Default
(Doc. 26). However, the Court vacated the entry of default as to Bujanda at the
Scheduling Conference on February 28, 2018 (Doc. 43).
1
On January 19, 2018, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Entry of Default Judgment as to
2
Defendants Universal Investments Group, LLC; JMR Express, LLC; and SHG Universal,
3
LLC (Doc. 36) and as of the February 28, 2016 Scheduling Conference, no opposition
4
was filed by the named Defendants.
5
The Court has reviewed and considered Plaintiff’s Motion for Entry of Default
6
Judgment (Doc. 36) and the Affidavit of Phil Bain submitted in support thereof (Doc. 36-
7
1) and determined that Plaintiff’s claim against Defendants Universal Investments Group,
8
LLC; JMR Express, LLC; and SHG Universal, LLC is for a sum certain in the amount of
9
$185,066.79. Plaintiff will thus be entitled to default judgment against these Defendants
10
under Rule 55(b)(1). However, two other Defendants have appeared in this matter, so the
11
disposition of Plaintiff’s claims against the three named Defendants does not end this
12
action and any judgment at this stage of the litigation would only be partial. Absent a
13
showing under Rule 54(b) that there is no just reason for delay for entry of judgment
14
against the three named Defendants, the Court must decline to enter partial judgment at
15
this time.
16
The Court has also determined Plaintiff is the successful party against the three
17
named Defendants and thus entitled to recovery of its attorneys’ fees and costs incurred
18
in accordance with A.R.S. §§ 12-341 and 12-341.01. Although Plaintiff’s Affidavit in
19
support of its Motion for Default Judgment included the computation of the sum certain
20
damages, neither the Affidavit nor Plaintiff’s Motion addressed the amount of attorneys’
21
fees Plaintiff contends it is entitled to, and the filed Form of Order (Doc. 36-2) also did
22
not include an award of attorneys’ fees.2 Plaintiff must substantiate any attorneys’ fees
23
award before it can be included in a judgment.
24
....
25
....
26
2
27
28
Upon the Court’s request at the Scheduling Conference (Doc. 43) that Plaintiff
provide the Court with a proposed Form of Order in Word format, Plaintiff e-mailed a
proposed Form of Order to the Court that did include an attorneys’ fees award. However,
Plaintiff has never substantiated that amount by affidavit or otherwise, so the Court
cannot include it in any judgment at this time.
-2-
1
2
3
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED denying Plaintiff’s Motion for Entry of Default
Judgment (Doc. 36) without prejudice.
Dated this 20th day of March, 2018.
4
5
6
Honorable John J. Tuchi
United States District Judge
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?