Manion et al v. Ameri-Can Freight Systems Incorporated et al
Filing
96
ORDER re: 95 Defendants' Objection to Plaintiffs' Supplemental Briefing [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 6/20/19. (MAW)
1
WO
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
9
Zandra Manion, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
10
11
ORDER
v.
12
No. CV-17-03262-PHX-DWL
Ameri-Can Freight Systems Incorporated, et
al.,
13
14
Defendants.
15
On May 21, 2019, the Court issued an order denying Defendants’ motion for
16
summary judgment. (Doc. 89.) Near the end of the order, the Court raised an issue that
17
hadn’t been addressed in the parties’ briefs—whether two different plaintiffs should be
18
allowed to assert a wrongful death claim in this case. (Id. at 9-10.) “Rather than
19
unilaterally select a solution,” the Court stated that “[t]he parties must meet and confer
20
regarding the proper Plaintiff (or Plaintiffs) in the wrongful death action and either stipulate
21
to Plaintiffs’ filing of an amended complaint or file supplemental briefing on this issue by
22
June 4, 2019.” (Id., emphasis added.)
23
On June 4, 2019, Plaintiffs filed a supplemental brief. (Doc. 90.) The first sentence
24
stated that, “[p]ursuant to the Court’s May 21, 2019 Order (docket #89), Plaintiffs’ counsel
25
having conferred, Plaintiffs jointly submit the following briefing regarding the appropriate
26
wrongful death parties.” (Id. at 1.) The supplemental brief went on to argue that “any
27
defect in the Complaint is harmless or has been waived” and that because “none of the
28
parties has raised the issue . . . the Court need not take up the issue.” (Id. at 6.)
1
Two days later, on June 6, 2019, the Court issued an order noting that, “[a]lthough
2
Plaintiffs’ filing did not indicate whether they met and conferred with Defendants, because
3
only Plaintiffs chose to file supplemental briefing on the issue, the Court will assume
4
Defendants do not object.” (Doc. 92.) Accordingly, the Court ordered that “Plaintiffs
5
Zandra Manion and Lisa Blyler may proceed as Plaintiffs in the wrongful death action.”
6
(Id.)
7
The next day, on June 7, 2019, Defendants filed an objection to Plaintiffs’
8
supplemental brief. (Doc. 95.) In it, Defendants assert that “Plaintiffs’ counsel did not
9
meet and confer with Defendants’ counsel as required by the Court’s order. Plaintiffs failed
10
to comply with the Court’s order, and instead, filed their Supplemental Briefing without
11
consulting Defendants.” (Id. at 2.) Defendants go on to argue that, on the merits, the Court
12
shouldn’t allow Manion and Blyler to act as separate plaintiffs for purposes of the wrongful
13
death claim and that “[a]ny result except requiring Plaintiffs[] to designate a single
14
representative prejudices Defendants and goes against Arizona law.” (Id.)
15
As an initial matter, the Court wishes to express its displeasure with Plaintiffs’
16
conduct. The May 21, 2019 order specifically required “the parties” to meet and confer.
17
It is unclear how the two Plaintiffs could have interpreted that language as requiring them
18
only to meet and confer with each other, and not with defense counsel.
19
As for how to proceed, the Court remains unwilling to unilaterally make any
20
changes to the operative complaint. The discussion of the two-plaintiffs issue in the May
21
21, 2019 order was simply meant to flag this issue for the parties’ attention, so they could
22
take whatever steps they felt necessary to address it. Because there are no motions pending
23
before the Court, there is nothing for the Court to do at this time.
24
…
25
…
26
…
27
…
28
-2-
1
Finally, to the extent Defendants still desire some form of relief, the Court
2
recommends they address this issue in the Proposed Final Pretrial Order. It can then be
3
further discussed, if necessary, at the Final Pretrial Conference on August 26, 2019.
4
Dated this 20th day of June, 2019.
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?