Ronning et al v. Fannie Mae et al
Filing
74
ORDER granting 70 Motion to Compel Compliance with Subpoena. Non-party Bowden shall comply with Plaintiffs Amended Subpoena Duces Tecum no later than close of business 1/22/2019. Plaintiffs' request for an award of reasonable attorneys' ; fees incurred in the filing of this Motion is denied. Plaintiffs' request for an Order to Show Cause is denied as premature. Plaintiffs may reurge a motion for an order to show cause should such a motion be necessary. Signed by Magistrate Judge Eileen S Willett on 1/9/19. (DXD)
1
WO
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
9
David Ronning, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
10
11
ORDER
v.
12
No. CV-17-03331-PHX-ESW
Fannie Mae, et al.,
13
Defendants.
14
15
16
The Court has considered Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Compliance with Subpoena
17
and Request for Order to Show Cause Why Non-Party Sheryl Bowden Should Not Be Held
18
in Contempt (Doc. 70).
19
No response has been filed, and the time for doing so has passed. LRCiv. 7.2(c).
20
Non-party Sheryl Bowden’s (“Bowden”) failure to timely file a response is deemed to be
21
consent to the granting of the Motion. LRCiv. 7.2(i). For good cause shown,
22
IT IS ORDERED granting Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Compliance with Subpoena
23
(Doc. 70). Non-party Bowden shall comply with Plaintiff’s Amended Subpoena Duces
24
Tecum no later than close of business January 22, 2019.
25
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying Plaintiffs’ request for an award of reasonable
26
attorneys’ fees incurred in the filing of this Motion. See Sali v. Corona Regional Medical
27
Center, 884 F.3d 1218, 1224 (9th Cir. 2018).
28
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying Plaintiffs’ request for an Order to Show
1
Cause as premature. Plaintiffs may reurge a motion for an order to show cause should such
2
a motion be necessary.
3
Dated this 9th day of January, 2019.
4
5
6
Honorable Eileen S. Willett
United States Magistrate Judge
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?