Chabrowski et al v. Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company NA

Filing 55

ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that by December 21, 2018, Plaintiffs shall file a response to this Order showing cause why Defendant Zieve Brodnax & Steele LLP should not be dismissed for failure to serve within the time limits of Federal Rule of Civil Proce dure 4(m). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion to File a Second Amended Complaint (Doc. 47 ) is denied for failure to comply with Local Rule Civil 15.1(a) ("A party who moves for leave to amend a pleading must attach a copy of the proposed amended pleading as an exhibit to the motion, which must indicate in what respect it differs from the pleading which it amends, by bracketing or striking through the text to be deleted and underlining the text to be added.") [see attached Order for details]. Signed by Judge Dominic W Lanza on 12/7/18. (MAW)

Download PDF
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 Anna Chabrowski and Darius Chabrowski, 9 Plaintiffs, 10 11 ORDER v. 12 No. CV-17-03867-PHX-DWL Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company NA, Zieve Brodnax & Steele LLP, and Bayview Loan Servicing LLC, 13 14 Defendants. 15 16 The original Complaint in this case named one Defendant: Bank of New York 17 Mellon Trust Company, NA, as Trustee of Certificate Holders of CWALT Incorporated, 18 Alternative Loan Trust 2006-20CB (hereinafter “Bank of New York”). On June 7, 2018, 19 the Court granted Plaintiffs leave to amend the complaint. (Doc. 31). The first amended 20 complaint (Doc. 32) added two new Defendants: Zieve Brodnax & Steele LLP1 and 21 Bayview Loan Servicing LLC. 22 To date, the Court sees no evidence that Plaintiffs have taken any steps to serve the 23 two newly added Defendants with the first amended complaint (Doc. 32).2 More than 90 24 1 25 26 Notably, this newly added Defendant is the law firm representing the original Defendant. After the first amended complaint was filed, Plaintiffs moved to disqualify counsel from continuing to represent Bank of New York. (Doc. 41). 2 27 28 The original defendant, Bank of New York, moved to dismiss the first amended complaint. (Doc. 33). An attorney filed a notice of appearance for Bayview Loan Servicing LLC (Doc. 43). Bayview Loan Serving LLC then joined Bank of New York’s motion to dismiss (Doc. 44). Because service was not raised, it is waived. Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(1). 1 days have elapsed since the first amended complaint was filed (see Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m)); 2 therefore, 3 IT IS ORDERED that by December 21, 2018, Plaintiffs shall file a response to this 4 Order showing cause why Defendant Zieve Brodnax & Steele LLP should not be dismissed 5 for failure to serve within the time limits of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). 6 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Motion to File a Second Amended 7 Complaint (Doc. 47) is denied for failure to comply with Local Rule Civil 15.1(a) (“A party 8 who moves for leave to amend a pleading must attach a copy of the proposed amended 9 pleading as an exhibit to the motion, which must indicate in what respect it differs from 10 the pleading which it amends, by bracketing or striking through the text to be deleted and 11 underlining the text to be added.”).3 12 Dated this 7th day of December, 2018. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 The motion to dismiss and motion to disqualify remain pending. -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?