King v. Corizon Incorporated et al

Filing 43

ORDER that the Report and Recommendation (Doc 33 ) is ACCEPTED. Petitioner's Motion to Amend the Complaint (Doc. 30 ) is denied. (See attached order for additional information.) Signed by Judge Michael T. Liburdi on 10/1/2019. (RMW)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

8
9

Ernest DuWayne King,

10

NO. CV-18-01187-PHX-MTL (CDB)

Plaintiff,
ORDER

11

v.

12

Corizon Incorporated, et al.,

13

Defendants.

14
15

Pending before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 33) from the

16

Magistrate Judge recommending that the Motion to Amend the Complaint (Doc. 30) be

17

denied. No objections have been received.

18

Accordingly, the Court hereby accepts the Report and Recommendation. See

19

Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985) (finding that district courts are not required to

20

conduct “any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an objection”; see

21

also United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc)

22

(“statute makes it clear that the district judge must review the magistrate judge’s findings

23

and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise”) (emphasis in

24

original).

25

///

26

///

27

///

28

///

1

Based on the foregoing,

2

IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc 33) is

3

ACCEPTED. Petitioner’s Motion to Amend the Complaint (Doc. 30) is denied.

4
5

Dated this 1st day of October, 2019.

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-2-