BoxNic Anstalt v. Gallerie degli Uffizi

Filing 43

ORDER re: 42 Notice (Other) filed by Gallerie degli Uffizi. Plaintiff must retain new counsel on or before 10/25/2019. If new counsel is not retained, plaintiff's claims will be dismissed with prejudice. Signed by Senior Judge David G Campbell on 10/1/2019. (DGC, nvo)

Download PDF
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 BoxNic Anstalt, Plaintiff/Counterdefendant, 10 11 ORDER v. 12 No. CV18-1263-PHX-DGC Gallerie degli Uffizi, 13 Defendant/Counterclaimant. 14 15 The Court held a hearing on September 3, 2019. On the basis of the hearing, the 16 Court will afford Plaintiff until October 25, 2019, to retain new counsel in this case. If 17 Plaintiff fails to do so, Plaintiff’s claims will be dismissed with prejudice. 18 Plaintiff’s counsel has moved to withdraw. Doc. 37. A corporation cannot appear 19 in federal court without counsel. Rowland v. Cal. Men’s Colony, Unit II Men’s Advisory 20 Counsel, 506 U.S. 194, 201-202 (1993). The Court accordingly set a telephone hearing for 21 September 3, 2019, and ordered a representative of Plaintiff to participate. Doc. 38. 22 The hearing was held as scheduled, and a representative of Plaintiff did not 23 participate. Counsel for Plaintiff stated that he had sent Plaintiff several emails advising it 24 of the hearing, including a copy of the Court’s order. Counsel further stated that Plaintiff 25 confirmed receipt of the emails, but stated that Plaintiff would not participate in the 26 hearing. Counsel said Plaintiff gave no reason for declining to participate. The Court 27 asked whether Plaintiff understood that a corporation cannot appear without counsel in 28 federal court, and that Plaintiff’s claims must be dismissed if counsel is allowed to 1 withdraw. Plaintiff’s counsel confirmed that Plaintiff was advised of this fact before it 2 declined to participate in the hearing. 3 The Court also discussed discovery issues at the hearing. Plaintiff has failed to 4 comply with its discovery obligations, despite the fact that less than three months remain 5 before the close of discovery. Doc. 39. Defendant asserted that Plaintiff committed to 6 correct the discovery deficiencies by July 24, 2019, but never did so. Id. at 2. When asked 7 during the hearing whether he disagreed with these assertions, Plaintiff’s counsel said no. 8 Thus, the Court is faced with the following situation: Plaintiff understands that it 9 must be represented by counsel in federal court; Plaintiff understands that its claims will 10 be dismissed if counsel is permitted to withdraw; Plaintiff declined to participate in the 11 September 3, 2019 hearing despite being ordered to do so; and Plaintiff has failed to comply 12 with its discovery obligations. 13 The Court will afford Plaintiff one final opportunity to comply with the Court’s 14 orders. Plaintiff shall have until October 25, 2019, for new counsel to appear on its behalf. 15 If new counsel has not formally appeared in this case by that date, the Court will grant the 16 motion to withdraw filed by current Plaintiff’s counsel, dismiss Plaintiff’s complaint with 17 prejudice, and enter a default judgment against Plaintiff on Defendant’s counterclaims. 18 Current counsel is directed to advise Plaintiff of this order, and provide Plaintiff with a 19 copy, immediately. 20 Dated this 1st day of October, 2019. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?