Parker v. Ryan et al

Filing 20

ORDER ADOPTING 19 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. IT IS ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Rateau's Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED and Petitioner's 1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. Clerk of Court shall enter judgment accordingly and close the file in this action. Signed by Judge Jennifer G Zipps on 6/1/20. (BAC)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Eddie Parker, No. CV-18-1492-PHX-JGZ Petitioner, 10 11 v. 12 ORDER David Shinn, et al., 13 Respondents. 14 15 16 Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by United States 17 Magistrate Judge Jacqueline M. Rateau. (Doc 19.) Magistrate Judge Rateau recommends 18 dismissing Petitioner’s § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus as time-barred without 19 excuse. (Id.) Magistrate Judge Rateau also recommends that the Court deny a certificate 20 of appealability. (Id. at p. 11.) 21 A review of the record reflects that the parties have not filed any objections to the 22 Report and Recommendation and the time to file objections has expired. As such, the 23 Court will not consider any objections or new evidence. 24 // 25 // 26 // 27 // 28 // 1 Upon review of the record, the Court will adopt Magistrate Judge Rateau’s 2 recommendations. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72; Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 3 140, 149–54 (1985). Accordingly, 4 IT IS ORDERED that: 5 1. 6 Magistrate Judge Rateau’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 19) is ADOPTED; 7 2. Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED; 8 3. A certificate of appealability is DENIED. 9 4. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment accordingly and close the file in this 10 11 action. Dated this 1st day of June, 2020. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?