Wise v. Ryan et al
Filing
40
ORDER ACCEPTING 38 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc. 1 ) is dismissed as moot. ORDERED a certificate of appealability is denied. FINALLY ORDERED directing the Clerk to enter final judgment consistent with this Order and dismiss the case. Signed by Judge Michael T Liburdi on 10/14/20. (EJA)
1
WO
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
9
Danny Wise,
No. CV-19-05076-PHX-MTL
Petitioner,
10
11
v.
12
ORDER
Attorney General of the State of Arizona, et
al.,
13
Respondents.
14
15
Pending before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (R & R) by Magistrate
16
Judge Camille D. Bibles, recommending that Petitioner Danny Wise’s Petition for Writ of
17
Habeas Corpus (the “Petition”) (Doc. 1) be dismissed as moot pursuant to 28
18
U.S.C. § 2254. (Doc. 38.) For reasons stated below, the Court will adopt Judge Bibles’
19
R & R.
20
I.
BACKGROUND
21
Petitioner Danny Wise filed the Petition on August 30, 2019, asserting ineffective
22
assistance of counsel and violations of his right to due process of law in his state criminal
23
proceedings. (Doc. 1.) Respondents filed an answer on December 6, 2019. (Doc. 18.)
24
Petitioner mailed a reply on March 26, 2020, which was docketed on March 30, 2020.
25
(Doc. 36.) Mail sent to Petitioner by the Court was returned as undeliverable on April 10,
26
2020, with a note indicating that Petitioner was deceased. (Docs. 37; 38 at 4.) Public
27
records from the Arizona Department of Corrections state that Petitioner died on March
28
29, 2020. (Doc. 38 at 4.)
1
Judge Bibles issued the R & R on May 6, 2020. (Doc. 38.) It recommends that, in
2
light of Petitioner’s death, the Petition be denied as moot. See, e.g., Dove v. United States,
3
423 U.S. 325, 325 (1976) (per curiam) (dismissing a petition for a writ of certiorari because
4
the petitioner had died); Griffey v. Lindsey, 349 F.3d 1157, 1157 (9th Cir. 2003) (dismissing
5
appeal of denial of § 2254 relief because the petitioner was deceased). No objections have
6
been filed to the R & R.
7
II.
LEGAL STANDARD
8
When a federal district court reviews a state prisoner’s habeas corpus petition
9
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, “it must decide whether the petitioner is ‘in custody in
10
violation of the Constitution or laws or treaties of the United States.’” Coleman v.
11
Thompson, 501 U.S. 722, 730 (1991) (quoting 28 U.S.C. § 2254). When reviewing a
12
Magistrate Judge’s R & R, this Court reviews de novo those portions of the report to which
13
an objection is made and “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings
14
or recommendations made by the magistrate judge.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C).
15
Parties have fourteen days from the service of a copy of the R & R to file specific
16
written objections with the Court. 28 U.S.C. ' 636(b)(1)(C). District courts are not
17
required to conduct “any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an
18
objection.” Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985).
19
III.
DISCUSSION
20
Having reviewed the R & R, and no objections having been made by any party, the
21
Court hereby incorporates and adopts the R & R. The Court will also decline to issue a
22
certificate of appealability. A certificate of appealability may only issue when the petitioner
23
“has made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. §
24
2253(c)(2). A certificate of appealability will not be issued because, in light of Petitioner’s
25
death, the relief is now moot.
26
IV.
CONCLUSION
27
Accordingly,
28
IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 38) is accepted.
-2-
1
2
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Doc.
1) is dismissed as moot.
3
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED a certificate of appealability is denied.
4
IT IS FINALLY ORDERED directing the Clerk to enter final judgment consistent
5
6
with this Order and dismiss the case.
Dated this 14th day of October, 2020.
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?