Ruelas v. USA
Filing
14
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION re: 13 Report and Recommendation. Movants Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is denied and dismissed with prejudice; and the Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. A Certificate of Appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal are denied because Movant has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 4/26/21. (DXD)
1
WO
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
9
Silvester Ruelas,
Movant,
10
No. CV-20-00372-PHX-JAT (JZB)
No. CR-17-00317-001-PHX-JAT
ORDER
11
v.
12
United States of America,
13
Respondent.
14
15
Pending before the Court is Movant’s Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct
16
Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Doc. 1) as amended (Doc. 5). The Magistrate
17
Judge issued a Report and Recommendation (R&R) (Doc. 13) recommending that the
18
Motion be denied.
19
Neither party has filed objections to the R&R and the time to object has run.
20
Accordingly, the Court hereby accepts the R&R. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149
21
(1985) (finding that district courts are not required to conduct “any review at all . . . of any
22
issue that is not the subject of an objection” (emphasis added)); United States v. Reyna-
23
Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (“statute makes it clear that the
24
district judge must review the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo
25
if objection is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis in original)); see also Schmidt v.
26
Johnstone, 263 F.Supp.2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003).
27
Thus,
28
IT IS ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc.
1
13) is accepted;
2
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Movant’s Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or
3
Correct Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 is denied and dismissed with prejudice; and
4
the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly.
5
IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that a Certificate of Appealability and leave to
6
proceed in forma pauperis on appeal are denied because Movant has not made a substantial
7
showing of the denial of a constitutional right. (See Doc. 13 at 8).
8
Dated this 26th day of April, 2021.
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?