Moore #275487 v. Shinn et al
Filing
55
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for Leave to File an Amended Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint is granted (Doc. 53 ). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Nielsen shall have seven days from the filing of this Order to file his Amended Ans wer to Plaintiff's Complaint which shall conform in substantive respects to the form of the proposed amendment attached to defendant Nielsens motion (Doc. 53 ). See attached Order for complete details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Eileen S Willett on 1/10/22. (SMH)
1
WO
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
9
Shawn Dale Moore,
Plaintiff,
10
11
ORDER
v.
12
No. CV-20-01223-PHX-ROS (ESW)
David Shinn, et al.,
13
Defendants.
14
15
Pending before the Court is Defendant Nielsen’s Motion for Leave to File an
16
Amended Answer to Plaintiff’s Complaint (Doc. 53). No response has been filed and the
17
time to do so has passed. LRCiv 7.2(i). For good cause shown,
18
19
IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for Leave to File an Amended Answer to
Plaintiff’s Complaint is granted (Doc. 53).
20
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Nielsen shall have seven days from
21
the filing of this Order to file his Amended Answer to Plaintiff’s Complaint which shall
22
conform in substantive respects to the form of the proposed amendment attached to
23
defendant Nielsen’s motion (Doc. 53).
24
Dated this 10th day of January, 2022.
25
26
27
28
Honorable Eileen S. Willett
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?