Moore #275487 v. Shinn et al

Filing 55

ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for Leave to File an Amended Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint is granted (Doc. 53 ). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Nielsen shall have seven days from the filing of this Order to file his Amended Ans wer to Plaintiff's Complaint which shall conform in substantive respects to the form of the proposed amendment attached to defendant Nielsens motion (Doc. 53 ). See attached Order for complete details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Eileen S Willett on 1/10/22. (SMH)

Download PDF
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Shawn Dale Moore, Plaintiff, 10 11 ORDER v. 12 No. CV-20-01223-PHX-ROS (ESW) David Shinn, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 15 Pending before the Court is Defendant Nielsen’s Motion for Leave to File an 16 Amended Answer to Plaintiff’s Complaint (Doc. 53). No response has been filed and the 17 time to do so has passed. LRCiv 7.2(i). For good cause shown, 18 19 IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for Leave to File an Amended Answer to Plaintiff’s Complaint is granted (Doc. 53). 20 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Nielsen shall have seven days from 21 the filing of this Order to file his Amended Answer to Plaintiff’s Complaint which shall 22 conform in substantive respects to the form of the proposed amendment attached to 23 defendant Nielsen’s motion (Doc. 53). 24 Dated this 10th day of January, 2022. 25 26 27 28 Honorable Eileen S. Willett United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?