Moore #275487 v. Shinn et al

Filing 55

ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for Leave to File an Amended Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint is granted (Doc. 53 ). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Nielsen shall have seven days from the filing of this Order to file his Amended Ans wer to Plaintiff's Complaint which shall conform in substantive respects to the form of the proposed amendment attached to defendant Nielsens motion (Doc. 53 ). See attached Order for complete details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Eileen S Willett on 1/10/22. (SMH)

1

WO

2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

8
9

Shawn Dale Moore,
Plaintiff,

10
11

ORDER

v.

12

No. CV-20-01223-PHX-ROS (ESW)

David Shinn, et al.,

13

Defendants.

14
15

Pending before the Court is Defendant Nielsen’s Motion for Leave to File an

16

Amended Answer to Plaintiff’s Complaint (Doc. 53). No response has been filed and the

17

time to do so has passed. LRCiv 7.2(i). For good cause shown,

18
19

IT IS ORDERED that the Motion for Leave to File an Amended Answer to
Plaintiff’s Complaint is granted (Doc. 53).

20

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant Nielsen shall have seven days from

21

the filing of this Order to file his Amended Answer to Plaintiff’s Complaint which shall

22

conform in substantive respects to the form of the proposed amendment attached to

23

defendant Nielsen’s motion (Doc. 53).

24

Dated this 10th day of January, 2022.

25
26
27
28

Honorable Eileen S. Willett
United States Magistrate Judge