Conway v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

Filing 6

ORDER that the application to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 2 ) is denied. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall pay the filing fee within 7 daysof this Order, or the Clerk of the Court shall dismiss this case (without prejudice) and enter judgment accordingly. See the attached order for additional information. Signed by Senior Judge James A. Teilborg on 11/17/2020. (RMW)

Download PDF
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 De Etta Diane Conway, 9 No. CV-20-02199-PHX-JAT Plaintiff, 10 11 v. 12 Commissioner Administration, ORDER 13 of Social Security Defendant. 14 15 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis. 16 Plaintiff claims a monthly income of approximately $4,275.00 between herself and her 17 spouse.1 Plaintiff further claims to have savings of approximately $22,000 and real estate 18 holdings worth $240,000 including a residence and another investment property. 19 Plaintiff and her spouse have approximately $4,870 in monthly expenses. These 20 expenses include, for example, $1,200/month on food due in part to the fact that Plaintiff 21 chooses to support four adult children and grandchildren. These dependents range in age 22 from 19 to 26 years old. (Doc. 2 at 3). By way of further example, Plaintiff lists owning 23 one 1997 and one 1999 vehicle, valued together at $5,000, but paying over $3,100 per year 24 in car insurance presumably to insure other people’s vehicles. 25 In Escobedo v. Applebees, 787 F.3d 1226, 1234-36 (9th Cir. 2015), the Court of 26 Appeals discussed that a plaintiff’s expenses exceeding their income would be a basis for 27 granting in forma pauperis status. However, in that case, there was no evidence that the 28 1 Arizona is a community property state. 1 plaintiff’s expenses were inflated due to plaintiff choosing to support multiple adults other 2 than plaintiff. 3 Here, in sum, Plaintiff has over $50,000 per year in income and over $250,000 in 4 assets but chooses to spend those resources in a way that makes her unable to meet her 5 monthly expenses. While Plaintiff can elect to spend her money how she chooses, that 6 does not mean she is actually unable to pay the filing fee. She is instead choosing to spend 7 her money on items other than the filing fee. Thus, Plaintiff has the resources to pay and 8 in forma pauperis status will be denied. 9 10 11 Based on the foregoing, IT IS ORDERED that the application to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. 2) is denied. 12 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall pay the filing fee within 7 days 13 of this Order, or the Clerk of the Court shall dismiss this case (without prejudice) and enter 14 judgment accordingly. 15 Dated this 17th day of November, 2020. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?