Cebreros-Sanchez v. USA

Filing 32

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION granting 31 Motion for Ruling and adopting 28 Report and Recommendation. the Motion Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody (Doc. 1 ) is denied and Petitioner's request for an evidentiary hearing is denied. Any request for a Certificate of Appealability and leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is denied because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. The Clerk shall terminate this action and enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Diane J Humetewa on 9/24/24. (DXD)

Download PDF
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Jose Ramon Cebreros-Sanchez, Petitioner, 10 No. CV-21-01799-PHX-DJH No. CR-16-01202-PHX-DJH-1 ORDER 11 v. 12 United States of America, 13 Respondent. 14 15 Before the Court is Petitioner Jose Ramon Cebreros-Sanchez’s Motion Under 28 16 U.S.C. § 2255 to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody 17 (the “§ 2255 Motion”) (Doc. 1) and the January 23, 2023, Report and Recommendation 18 (“R&R”) issued by Magistrate Judge Eileen S. Willett (Doc. 28). In her R&R, Judge 19 Willett recommends the § 2255 Motion be denied without an evidentiary hearing. (Id. at 20 20). She also recommends that a Certificate of Appealability and leave to proceed in 21 forma pauperis be denied because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the 22 denial of a constitutional right. (Id.) 23 On February 21, 2023, Petitioner filed a one-page objection to the R&R (Doc. 29) 24 in which he asserts that the R&R did not address one of the six grounds he raised in his 25 § 2255 Motion. Specifically, Petitioner says the R&R failed to address his argument that 26 his counsel’s performance was constitutionally deficient for failing to raise the argument 27 that the jury had not found drug quantities that impacted the statutory maximum and 28 mandatory minimum sentence that he received. (Id.) The Government filed a Response 1 to Petitioner’s objection (Doc. 30) that points out that the R&R addresses Petitioner’s 2 argument at length on pages 14–16. 3 The Court has reviewed the comprehensive R&R and agrees with the Government. 4 The R&R not only addresses Petitioner’s § 2255 argument, it makes a sound 5 recommendation as to why Petitioner’s trial and appellate counsel were not deficient in 6 failing to challenge the sentence on appeal. (See Doc. 28 at 15–16 (finding that the 7 Court’s sentence comported with the Sixth Amendment because “the jury in this case 8 found beyond a reasonable doubt that Count 1 involved more than 500 grams of 9 methamphetamine” and “the Court did not impose sentences on Counts 1 and 2 that 10 exceeded the statutory maximum”)). The Court will, therefore, overrule Petitioner’s 11 objection, accept the R&R, and dismiss the Petition. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (“A 12 judge of the court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or 13 recommendations made by the magistrate judge.”); Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b)(3) (same). 14 Accordingly, 15 IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motion for Ruling (Doc. 31) is granted as 16 stated herein. Magistrate Judge Willett’s R&R (Doc. 28) is accepted and adopted as the 17 Order of this Court. 18 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to 19 Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody (Doc. 1) is denied 20 and Petitioner’s request for an evidentiary hearing is denied. 21 Certificate of Appealability and leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is denied 22 because Petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional 23 right. 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// -2- Any request for a 1 2 3 IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall terminate this action and enter judgment accordingly. Dated this 24th day of September, 2024. 4 5 6 7 Honorable Diane J. Humetewa United States District Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?