BNSF Railway Company v. Coconino Land & Cattle LLC, et al

Filing 268

ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED denying the motions without prejudice. (Docs. 138, 202, 209, 211, 245, 257, and 261). (See document for full details). Signed by Judge Paul G Rosenblatt on 9/19/11.(LAD)

1

WO

2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

8
9
10
11
12

BNSF Railway Co.,
Plaintiff,
vs.
Coconino Land and Cattle LLC
Defendant.

13

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. 07-8068-PCT-PGR

ORDER

14

Pending before the Court are the following motions: Coconino’s Motion for Partial

15

Summary Judgment re Private Way of Necessity (Doc. 138), BNSF’s Motion for Sanctions

16

(Doc. 202), BNSF’s Motion for Summary Judgment on Federal Statutory Issues or Motion

17

for Referral to Surface Transportation Board (Doc. 209), BNSF’s Motion for Summary

18

Judgment on Coconino’s Grant and Prescription Counterclaims (Doc. 211), BNSF’s Motion

19

to Supplement the Record (Doc. 245), BNSF’s Motion for Judgment (Doc. 257), and

20

Coconino’s Cross-Motion to Dismiss All Pending Claims (Doc. 261).

21

The Court referred this matter to the Circuit Mediation Office of the Ninth Circuit

22

Court of Appeals on June 13, 2011 (Docs. 264, 265), and subsequently vacated oral argument

23

on all pending motions (Doc. 267).

24

Accordingly,

25

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED denying the motions without prejudice. (Docs. 138, 202,

26
27
28

209, 211, 245, 257, and 261).
DATED this 19th day of September, 2011.