BNSF Railway Company v. Coconino Land & Cattle LLC, et al

Filing 268

ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED denying the motions without prejudice. (Docs. 138, 202, 209, 211, 245, 257, and 261). (See document for full details). Signed by Judge Paul G Rosenblatt on 9/19/11.(LAD)

Download PDF
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 10 11 12 BNSF Railway Co., Plaintiff, vs. Coconino Land and Cattle LLC Defendant. 13 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 07-8068-PCT-PGR ORDER 14 Pending before the Court are the following motions: Coconino’s Motion for Partial 15 Summary Judgment re Private Way of Necessity (Doc. 138), BNSF’s Motion for Sanctions 16 (Doc. 202), BNSF’s Motion for Summary Judgment on Federal Statutory Issues or Motion 17 for Referral to Surface Transportation Board (Doc. 209), BNSF’s Motion for Summary 18 Judgment on Coconino’s Grant and Prescription Counterclaims (Doc. 211), BNSF’s Motion 19 to Supplement the Record (Doc. 245), BNSF’s Motion for Judgment (Doc. 257), and 20 Coconino’s Cross-Motion to Dismiss All Pending Claims (Doc. 261). 21 The Court referred this matter to the Circuit Mediation Office of the Ninth Circuit 22 Court of Appeals on June 13, 2011 (Docs. 264, 265), and subsequently vacated oral argument 23 on all pending motions (Doc. 267). 24 Accordingly, 25 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED denying the motions without prejudice. (Docs. 138, 202, 26 27 28 209, 211, 245, 257, and 261). DATED this 19th day of September, 2011.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?