Rause et al v. Paperchine, Inc et al

Filing 123

ORDER that Pla is to submit a status report by 10/16/09 updating the Court on counsel's efforts to have a guardian ad litem appointed in Texas. It is further ordered that the previous deadline of 10/02/09 for submitting the status report is VACATED. Signed by Judge Stephen M McNamee on 09/10/09. (ESL)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WO IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA DIANA RAUSE, surviving natural mother of JOHNNY MENDOZA, JR., deceased, individually and on behalf of all wrongful death beneficiaries; GABRIEL RODRIGUEZ, a single man, Plaintiffs, v. PAPERCHINE, INC., a foreign corporation; ABITIBI CONSOLIDATED SALES CORPORATION, a foreign corporation; DOES I-X; BLACK CORPORATIONS I-X; and WHITE PARTNERSHIPS I-X, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CV-07-8076-PCT-SMM ORDER On September 4, 2009, the Court issued an Order granting Plaintiff an extension of time to have a guardian ad litem appointed in Texas (Doc. 121). In that Order, the Court incorrectly gave the date of the next status conference as October 5, 2009. However, pursuant to a previous Minute Entry (Doc. 117), the next status conference is scheduled for October 19, 2009 at 3:00p.m. In light of this date, the Court will give Plaintiff until October 16, 2009 to submit a status report updating the Court on counsel's efforts to have a guardian ad litem appointed. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff is to submit a status report by October 16, 2009 updating the Court on counsel's efforts to have a guardian ad litem appointed in Texas. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the previous deadline of October 2, 2009 for submitting the status report is VACATED. DATED this 10th day of September, 2009. -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?