Satala v. Schriro et al

Filing 20

ORDER that Petitioner's Motion 19 for Reconsideration is DENIED; Petitioner, however, shall file his reply to Respondents' Answer to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus no later than June 17, 2009. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michelle H Burns on 6/11/09.(KMG, )

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WO IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Robert Daniel Satala, Petitioner, vs. Dora B. Schriro, et al., Respondents. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIV 08-8137-PCT-MHM (MHB) ORDER Petitioner Robert Daniel Satala, who is confined in the Arizona State Prison ComplexEyman, has filed a pro se Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. (Doc. #1.) Pending before the Court is Petitioner's Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. #19). Petitioner requests that the Court reconsider its Order granting him until June 11, 2009 to file a reply. Petitioner seeks an additional 6 days until June 17, 2009 to file a reply. Motions for reconsideration should be granted only if the court is presented with newly discovered evidence, committed clear error or the initial decision was manifestly unjust, or if there is an intervening change in controlling law. Plaintiff has failed to demonstrate that any of these grounds exist. As such, Petitioner's motion will be denied. The Court will, however, in its discretion, allow Petitioner an additional 6 days until June 17, 2009 to file a reply. \\\ \\\ \\\ \\\ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner's Motion for Reconsideration (Doc. #19) is DENIED; Petitioner, however, shall file his reply to Respondents' Answer to Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus no later than June 17, 2009. DATED this 11th day of June, 2009. -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?