Satala v. Schriro et al

Filing 22

ORDER granting 21 Motion for Extension of Time - The Court in its discretion, will allow Petitioner an additional 30 days from the date of his request (June 10, 2009) until July 10, 2009 to file a reply. No further extensions will be granted without a showing of good cause, supported by specific facts demonstrating why in the exercise of due diligence, a reply could not be filed in time. Signed by Magistrate Judge Michelle H Burns on 6/17/09.(KMG, )

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WO IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Robert Daniel Satala, Petitioner, vs. Dora B. Schriro, et al., Respondents. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIV 08-8137-PCT-MHM (MHB) ORDER Petitioner Robert Daniel Satala, who is confined in the Arizona State Prison ComplexEyman, has filed a pro se Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. (Doc. #1.) Pending before the Court is Petitioner's Motion for Extension of Time (Third Request) (Doc. #21). Petitioner requests that the Court grant him an additional thirty (30) days to file a reply. Petitioner asks for the additional time because of inmate transfers, presumably involving him, that are occurring due to the reclassification of his housing unit. The Court in its discretion, will allow Petitioner an additional 30 days from the date of his request (June 10, 2009) until July 10, 2009 to file a reply. No further extensions will be granted without a showing of good cause, supported by specific facts demonstrating why in the exercise of due diligence, a reply could not be filed in time. DATED this 17th day of June, 2009.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?