White v. Schriro et al

Filing 186

ORDER that Petitioner's habeas proceeding is STAYED pending further order of the Court. The competency hearing set for October 27-28, 2010 is VACATED. That no later than October 8, 2010, the parties shall file a Joint Report Re: Competency Resto ration setting forth each party's proposed course of action for this litigation in light of the Court's finding of incompetency, including the availability of placement in the Arizona State Hospital. Signed by Judge G Murray Snow on 9/29/10. (DMT)

Download PDF
White v. Ryan et al Doc. 186 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WO IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA Michael Ray White, Petitioner, v. Charles L. Ryan, et al., Respondents. ) No. CV 08-8139-PCT-GMS ) ) DEATH PENALTY CASE ) ) ) ORDER ) ) ) ) ) ) On September 28, 2010, the Court held a status conference in this matter. Ken Murray and Robin Konrad, Assistant Federal Public Defenders, appeared on behalf of Petitioner. Lacey Stover Gard, Assistant Arizona Attorney General, appeared on behalf of Respondents. At the conference, the parties stipulated that Petitioner is presently incompetent to assist habeas counsel pursuant to Rohan ex rel. Gates v. Woodford, 334 F.3d 803 (2003). Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner's habeas proceeding is STAYED pending further order of the Court. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the competency hearing set for October 27-28, 2010 is VACATED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no later than October 8, 2010, the parties shall file a Joint Report Re: Competency Restoration setting forth each party's proposed course Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 of action for this litigation in light of the Court's finding of incompetency, including the availability of placement in the Arizona State Hospital. DATED this 29th day of September, 2010. -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?