Castle v. Eurofresh, Inc. et al

Filing 91

ORDER denying as premature 86 Motion for Settlement Conference; denying without prejudice 87 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge David K Duncan on 3/3/11.(DMT)

-DKD Castle v. Eurofresh, Inc. et al

Doc. 91

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

WO

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

William W. Castle, Plaintiff, vs. Eurofresh Incorporated, et al., Defendants.

) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) )

No. CIV 09-8114-PCT-JWS (DKD)

ORDER

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel (Doc. 87). Plaintiff requests that the court appoint counsel because he lacks legal training, cannot afford counsel, and because the issues in this matter are complex. (Id.) Plaintiff's first motion for the appointment of counsel was denied September 30, 2009 (Doc. 12). Plaintiff has not demonstrated a likelihood of success on the merits, nor has he shown that he is experiencing difficulty in litigating this case because of the complexity of the issues involved. Moreover, Plaintiff's numerous filings with the Court as well as the pending motion, indicate that Plaintiff is capable of presenting legal and factual arguments to the Court. After reviewing the file, the Court determines that this case does not present exceptional circumstances requiring the appointment of counsel. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel (Doc. 87) is DENIED without prejudice.

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED denying Plaintiff's Motion for Settlement Conference (Doc. 86), as premature in light of the pending dispositive motions deadline. DATED this 3rd day of March, 2011.

-2-