Blakey, Jr. v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Filing 24

ORDER granting 23 Defendant Wells Fargo Bank's Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Frederick J Martone on 9/16/10.(LSP)

Download PDF
Blakey, Jr. v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. Doc. 24 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff Robert Blakey, Jr. brings this action against Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. concerning a Line of Credit Agreement plaintiff had with Wells Fargo Bank. The complaint includes claims of breach of contract, tortious breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, negligent misrepresentation, violations of A.R.S. § 13-2310 and § 13-2311, violation of the Arizona Consumer Fraud Act, A.R.S. § 44-1521, fraudulent concealment, and punitive damages. The court has before it a motion to dismiss by defendant Wells Fargo Bank ("movant") (doc. 23). Plaintiff has failed to respond. Plaintiff filed this action in the Superior Court of Arizona in Yavapai County on November 24, 2009. Movant removed it to this court on January 4, 2010 and moved to ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., a National) Banking Institution licensed to do business) in Arizona and its agents; John and Jane) Does 1-10; ABC Corporations; DEF) Limited Liability Companies; and GHI) ) Partnerships, ) ) Defendant. ) ) Robert Blakey, Jr., No. CV10-8000-PCT-FJM ORDER NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA WO Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 dismiss plaintiff's first amended complaint on August 18, 2010. LRCiv 7.2(i) permits summary disposition of motions for non-compliance with briefing requirements. Failure to respond is deemed consent to the granting of the motion. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED GRANTING defendant Wells Fargo Bank's motion to dismiss (doc. 23). DATED this 16th day of September, 2010. -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?