Cettolin et al v. GMAC Mortgage, LLC, et al
Filing
47
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED DENYING Plaintiffs' New Motion for Relief on Consent Orders FRCP 60 (Doc. 45) and the associated Request for Judicial Notice (Doc. 46). (See document for further details). Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 5/24/11.(LAD)
1
WO
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Fausto U. Cettolin, Jr.; Donna L. Cettolin,)
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
vs.
)
)
GMAC; Mortgage Electronic Registration)
Systems, Inc.; Executive Trustee Services,)
)
LLC; et. al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
No. CV 10-8036-PCT-JAT
ORDER
16
17
Plaintiffs filed their Notice of Appeal on December 27, 2010. (Doc. 42.) “Once a
18
notice of appeal is filed, the district court is divested of jurisdiction over the matters being
19
appealed.” Natural Res. Def. Council v. Southwest Marine Inc., 242 F.3d 1163, 1166 (9th
20
Cir. 2001)(quoting Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co., 459 U.S. 56, 58 (1982)).
21
The Court retains jurisdiction pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4)(B)(i), even after a notice
22
of appeal has been filed, to dispose of certain previously-filed motions to modify, amend or
23
provide relief from the Court’s judgment. See Natural Res. Def. Council., 242 F.3d at 1166
24
(emphasis added).
25
Plaintiffs filed their “New Motion for Relief on Consent Orders – FRCP 60” on May
26
20, 2011. (Doc. 45.) They filed their Notice of Appeal on December 27, 2010. (Doc. 42.)
27
Because Plaintiffs filed the pending Motion for Relief after they filed their Notice of Appeal,
28
the Court lacks jurisdiction to decide the Motion. Id.
1
Accordingly,
2
IT IS ORDERED DENYING Plaintiffs’ New Motion for Relief on Consent Orders
3
4
– FRCP 60 (Doc. 45) and the associated Request for Judicial Notice (Doc. 46).
DATED this 24th day of May, 2011.
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?