Cettolin et al v. GMAC Mortgage, LLC, et al

Filing 47

ORDER - IT IS ORDERED DENYING Plaintiffs' New Motion for Relief on Consent Orders FRCP 60 (Doc. 45) and the associated Request for Judicial Notice (Doc. 46). (See document for further details). Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 5/24/11.(LAD)

Download PDF
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Fausto U. Cettolin, Jr.; Donna L. Cettolin,) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) GMAC; Mortgage Electronic Registration) Systems, Inc.; Executive Trustee Services,) ) LLC; et. al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) No. CV 10-8036-PCT-JAT ORDER 16 17 Plaintiffs filed their Notice of Appeal on December 27, 2010. (Doc. 42.) “Once a 18 notice of appeal is filed, the district court is divested of jurisdiction over the matters being 19 appealed.” Natural Res. Def. Council v. Southwest Marine Inc., 242 F.3d 1163, 1166 (9th 20 Cir. 2001)(quoting Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co., 459 U.S. 56, 58 (1982)). 21 The Court retains jurisdiction pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4)(B)(i), even after a notice 22 of appeal has been filed, to dispose of certain previously-filed motions to modify, amend or 23 provide relief from the Court’s judgment. See Natural Res. Def. Council., 242 F.3d at 1166 24 (emphasis added). 25 Plaintiffs filed their “New Motion for Relief on Consent Orders – FRCP 60” on May 26 20, 2011. (Doc. 45.) They filed their Notice of Appeal on December 27, 2010. (Doc. 42.) 27 Because Plaintiffs filed the pending Motion for Relief after they filed their Notice of Appeal, 28 the Court lacks jurisdiction to decide the Motion. Id. 1 Accordingly, 2 IT IS ORDERED DENYING Plaintiffs’ New Motion for Relief on Consent Orders 3 4 – FRCP 60 (Doc. 45) and the associated Request for Judicial Notice (Doc. 46). DATED this 24th day of May, 2011. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?