Cettolin et al v. GMAC Mortgage, LLC, et al

Filing 49

ORDER - IT IS ORDERED DENYING Plaintiffs' Motion to Entertain Motion for Relief on Consent Orders FRCP 60 (Doc. 48). (See document for details). Signed by Judge James A Teilborg on 6/14/11.(LAD)

Download PDF
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Fausto U. Cettolin, Jr.; Donna L. Cettolin,) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) GMAC; Mortgage Electronic Registration) Systems, Inc.; Executive Trustee Services,) ) LLC; et. al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) No. CV 10-8036-PCT-JAT ORDER 16 17 Plaintiffs filed a New Rule 60 Motion for Relief (Doc. 45) on May 20, 2011, which 18 the Court denied on May 24, 2011 for lack of jurisdiction (Doc. 47). The Court denied the 19 Motion because Plaintiffs filed a Notice of Appeal before filing the New Rule 60 Motion, 20 which divested this Court of jurisdiction to decide the Motion. 21 Plaintiffs now have filed a Motion to Entertain Motion for Relief (Doc. 48). Plaintiffs 22 claim that this Court can decide a Rule 60(b) motion after a notice of appeal is filed if a party 23 follows the procedure outlined in Davis v. Yageo, 481 F.3d 661, 685 (9th Cir. 2007). That 24 procedure is to “ask the district court whether it wishes to entertain the motion, or to grant 25 it, and then move [the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals], if appropriate, for remand of the 26 case.” Id. (citing Gould v. Mut. Life Ins. Co. of N.Y., 790 F.2d 769, 772 (9th Cir. 1986)). 27 The Court does not wish to either entertain or grant the New Motion for Relief (Doc. 45). 28 Accordingly, 1 2 3 IT IS ORDERED DENYING Plaintiffs’ Motion to Entertain Motion for Relief on Consent Orders – FRCP 60 (Doc. 48). DATED this 14th day of June, 2011. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?