United States of America v. Walzak

Filing 16

ORDER granting 11 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. This action is dismissed in its entirety. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Paul G Rosenblatt on 6/21/11.(LSP)

Download PDF
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 10 11 12 13 United States of America, ) ) Plaintiff, ) vs. ) ) Lesli M. Walzak a.k.a. Lesli M. Griffen, ) ) Defendant. ) ) No. 10-CV-8098-PCT-PGR ORDER 14 15 Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment. (Doc. 11.) Having 16 reviewed the entire record, the Court finds that Plaintiff’s moving papers are sufficient to 17 support a motion for summary judgment and do not reveal a genuine issue of material fact. 18 (Id., see Docs. 12, 15.) The Court further finds that Plaintiff’s motion should be granted 19 pursuant to Local Rule 7.2(i), based on Defendant’s failure to file an answering 20 memorandum. See Brydges v. Lewis, 18 F.3d 651 (9th Cir. 1994). 21 Accordingly, 22 IT IS ORDERED granting Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 11). This 23 24 25 26 27 action is dismissed in its entirety. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment accordingly. DATED this 21st day of June, 2011.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?