United States of America v. Walzak

Filing 16

ORDER granting 11 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. This action is dismissed in its entirety. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Paul G Rosenblatt on 6/21/11.(LSP)

1

WO

2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

8
9
10
11
12
13

United States of America,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
vs.
)
)
Lesli M. Walzak a.k.a. Lesli M. Griffen, )
)
Defendant.
)
)

No. 10-CV-8098-PCT-PGR

ORDER

14
15

Before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment. (Doc. 11.) Having

16

reviewed the entire record, the Court finds that Plaintiff’s moving papers are sufficient to

17

support a motion for summary judgment and do not reveal a genuine issue of material fact.

18

(Id., see Docs. 12, 15.) The Court further finds that Plaintiff’s motion should be granted

19

pursuant to Local Rule 7.2(i), based on Defendant’s failure to file an answering

20

memorandum. See Brydges v. Lewis, 18 F.3d 651 (9th Cir. 1994).

21

Accordingly,

22

IT IS ORDERED granting Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 11). This

23
24
25
26
27

action is dismissed in its entirety. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment accordingly.
DATED this 21st day of June, 2011.