Cooke et al v. Colorado City, Town of et al

Filing 643

ORDER - The Court has considered the parties' post-verdict memoranda and briefing. ORDERED that Plaintiffs shall file, on or before May 16, 2014, a proposed form of judgment. FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants may file, on or before May 26, 2014 , a response to Plaintiffs proposed form of judgment. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs may file, within ten (10) days after thefiling of Defendants response, a reply to Defendants response containing such points of authorities and argument as they de em necessary. FURTHER ORDERED that there will be no hearing on the proposed form of judgment unless as the Court may order on its own motion at a later date. (See attached order for details.) Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 5/6/2014. (TLB)

1

WO

2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

8
9

Ronald Cooke, et al.,
Plaintiffs,

10
11

ORDER

v.

12

No. CV-10-08105-PCT-JAT

Town of Colorado City, et al.,

13
14
15

Defendants.
The Court has considered the parties’ post-verdict memoranda and briefing (Docs.
595, 596, 603, 604) and orders as follows:

16

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiffs shall file, on or before May 16, 2014, a proposed

17

form of judgment. Plaintiffs must include in their proposed form of judgment all relief

18

requested in this case (including relief related to the jury’s verdicts), as the Court will

19

deem any relief not so included to be waived. The proposed form of judgment must be in

20

the form of separately numbered paragraphs with no more than one finding, conclusion,

21

or order per paragraph. Plaintiffs shall not include any arguments or citations to

22

authorities in their proposed form of judgment. Any briefing or memoranda containing

23

arguments must be limited to the reply.

24

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants may file, on or before May 26,

25

2014, a response to Plaintiffs’ proposed form of judgment. Defendants’ response must

26

contain separately numbered paragraphs corresponding to the numbered paragraphs in

27

Plaintiffs’ proposed form of judgment. Defendants shall, in each numbered paragraph,

28

state whether they agree with or object to the corresponding paragraph in Plaintiffs’

1

proposed form of judgment. For each objection, Defendants may succinctly state the

2

basis for their objection, which may include points of authorities and argument.

3

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs may file, within ten days after the

4

filing of Defendants’ response, a reply to Defendants’ response containing such points of

5

authorities and argument as they deem necessary.

6
7
8

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that there will be no hearing on the proposed form
of judgment unless as the Court may order on its own motion at a later date.
Dated this 6th day of May, 2014.

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-2-