Cooke et al v. Colorado City, Town of et al
Filing
737
ORDER - The Court notes that Plaintiff State of Arizona has filed a "Notice of Filing Form of Judgment" (Doc. 736 ). Because this filing is not a motion, the Court will not take any action on it. See attached Order. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 9/1/2015. (TLB)
1
WO
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
9
Ronald Cooke, et al.,
Plaintiffs,
10
11
ORDER
v.
12
No. CV-10-08105-PCT-JAT
Town of Colorado City, et al.,
13
Defendants.
14
15
The Court notes that Plaintiff State of Arizona has filed a “Notice of Filing Form
16
of Judgment” (Doc. 736). Because this filing is not a motion, the Court will not take any
17
action on it.
18
Moreover, the Court notes that under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”)
19
58(a)(3), a judgment for an award of attorneys’ fees is not required to be entered in a
20
separate document. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a)(3). The State of Arizona is not entitled to
21
the entry of judgment in a separate document for the Court’s award of attorneys’ fees
22
(Doc. 726). The Court has previously declined such a request. See United States v.
23
Business Recovery Servs., LLC, 2012 WL 3064253 (D. Ariz. July 26, 2012). The State of
24
Arizona has not shown that a separate document is necessary for the execution of the
25
judgment.
26
/
27
/
28
/
1
2
/
Dated this 1st day of September, 2015.
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?