Taylor v. Autozone, Inc.

Filing 85

ORDER granting 62 Motion to Modify the Scheduling Order. Paragraph 6 of the Rule 16 Scheduling Order (doc. 22) is amended to provide that all discovery must be completed by October 21, 2011. (See document for full details). Signed by Judge Frederick J Martone on 6/10/11.(LAD)

Download PDF
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Michael L. Taylor, on behalf of himself) and other persons similarly situated, et al.,) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) Autozone, Inc. et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) No. CV-10-8125-PCT-FJM ORDER 15 16 We have before us plaintiffs’ motion (doc. 62) to modify the Rule 16 scheduling order 17 (doc. 22). Defendant has not responded. Plaintiffs request that we extend the discovery 18 cutoff date from August 31, 2011 to October 21, 2011, 150 days after the date of our order 19 conditionally certifying the class (doc. 67). 20 We may modify a Rule 16 schedule only upon a showing of “good cause.” Fed. R. 21 Civ. P. 16(b)(4). The “‘good cause’ standard primarily considers the diligence of the party 22 seeking the amendment.” Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc., 975 F.2d 604, 609 (9th 23 Cir. 1992). We may modify the order only “if it cannot reasonably be met despite the 24 diligence of the party seeking the extension.” Zivkovic v. Southern California Edison Co., 25 302 F.3d 1080, 1087 (9th Cir. 2002). 26 Plaintiffs filed their motion for conditional class certification on November 30, 2010, 27 and the motion was fully briefed on December 27, 2010. Because of an especially busy 28 period for the court, we did not issue our order conditionally certifying the class until May 1 24, 2011 (doc. 67). The time needed to produce potential class members’ contact 2 information and send notice to potential class members, as well as the opt-in period, leaves 3 the parties with little opportunity for plaintiff-specific discovery. We therefore conclude that 4 there is good cause to extend the discovery cutoff deadline to October 21, 2011. 5 Neither this extension, nor its consequences, will be grounds for further modification 6 of the Rule 16 schedule, including the dispositive motion deadline of September 30, 2011. 7 The parties are advised to complete relevant discovery sooner rather than later. 8 IT IS ORDERED GRANTING plaintiffs’ motion to modify the scheduling order 9 (doc. 62). Paragraph 6 of the Rule 16 Scheduling Order (doc. 22) is amended to provide that 10 11 all discovery must be completed by October 21, 2011. DATED this 10th day of June, 2011. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?