Bean et al v. Pearson Education Incorporated
ORDER denying Defendant's 142 Motion for Leave to File Surreply. Signed by Senior Judge Paul G Rosenblatt on 7/18/12.(REW)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Tom Bean, et al.,
Pearson Education, Inc.,
Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Leave to File Surreply in Further
Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel. (Doc. 142.) Defendant asserts that Plaintiffs’
reply contains new arguments and inaccurate information. (Id.) Plaintiffs’ oppose the motion,
arguing that the proposed surreply repeats Defendant’s previous arguments and discusses
documents produced since Plaintiffs filed their motion to compel. (Doc. 144 at 2.)
The local rules make no provision for the filing of surreplies, see LRCiv 7.2, and the
Court finds that the discovery issues pending before it have been adequately briefed. The
Court notes that it will not consider any issues or evidence identified for the first time in
Plaintiffs’ reply brief.
IT IS ORDERED denying Defendant’s Motion for Leave to File Surreply (Doc. 142).
DATED this 18th day of July, 2012.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?