Bean et al v. Pearson Education Incorporated

Filing 150

ORDER denying Defendant's 142 Motion for Leave to File Surreply. Signed by Senior Judge Paul G Rosenblatt on 7/18/12.(REW)

Download PDF
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Tom Bean, et al., Plaintiffs, 10 11 v. 12 Pearson Education, Inc., 13 Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CV 11-8030-PCT-PGR ORDER 14 15 Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Leave to File Surreply in Further 16 Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel. (Doc. 142.) Defendant asserts that Plaintiffs’ 17 reply contains new arguments and inaccurate information. (Id.) Plaintiffs’ oppose the motion, 18 arguing that the proposed surreply repeats Defendant’s previous arguments and discusses 19 documents produced since Plaintiffs filed their motion to compel. (Doc. 144 at 2.) 20 The local rules make no provision for the filing of surreplies, see LRCiv 7.2, and the 21 Court finds that the discovery issues pending before it have been adequately briefed. The 22 Court notes that it will not consider any issues or evidence identified for the first time in 23 Plaintiffs’ reply brief. 24 Accordingly, 25 IT IS ORDERED denying Defendant’s Motion for Leave to File Surreply (Doc. 142). 26 DATED this 18th day of July, 2012. 27 28

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?