Bean et al v. Pearson Education Incorporated
ORDER granting Plaintiffs' 35 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply; the response Plaintiffs filed on 4/19/11 (Doc. 35, Ex. A), is deemed filed as of that date. Signed by Judge Paul G Rosenblatt on 5/2/11.(REW)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Tom Bean, et al.,
Pearson Education, Inc.,
Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply.
(Doc. 35.) On March 22, 2011, Defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss Case. (Doc. 26.) On
April 18, 2011, Plaintiffs having failed to respond to the motion, Defendant filed a Notice
of Unopposed Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Complaint. (Doc. 34.) In the present motion,
filed April 19, Plaintiffs acknowledge that due to a “calendaring mistake” they failed to file
a timely response to Defendant’s motion to dismiss. (Doc. 35 at 3.) On April 28, Defendant
filed a notice of non-opposition to Plaintiffs’ motion for an extension. (Doc. 36.)
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED granting Plaintiffs’ Motion for Extension of Time to
File Response/Reply (Doc. 35). The response Plaintiffs filed on April 19, 2011 (Doc. 35, Ex.
A), is deemed filed as of that date.
DATED this 2nd day of May, 2011.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?