Bean et al v. Pearson Education Incorporated

Filing 40

ORDER granting Plaintiffs' 35 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply; the response Plaintiffs filed on 4/19/11 (Doc. 35, Ex. A), is deemed filed as of that date. Signed by Judge Paul G Rosenblatt on 5/2/11.(REW)

1

WO

2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

8
9

Tom Bean, et al.,
Plaintiffs,

10
11

v.

12

Pearson Education, Inc.,

13

Defendant.

14

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CV 11-8030-PCT-PGR
ORDER

15

Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply.

16

(Doc. 35.) On March 22, 2011, Defendant filed a Motion to Dismiss Case. (Doc. 26.) On

17

April 18, 2011, Plaintiffs having failed to respond to the motion, Defendant filed a Notice

18

of Unopposed Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Complaint. (Doc. 34.) In the present motion,

19

filed April 19, Plaintiffs acknowledge that due to a “calendaring mistake” they failed to file

20

a timely response to Defendant’s motion to dismiss. (Doc. 35 at 3.) On April 28, Defendant

21

filed a notice of non-opposition to Plaintiffs’ motion for an extension. (Doc. 36.)

22

Accordingly,

23

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED granting Plaintiffs’ Motion for Extension of Time to

24

File Response/Reply (Doc. 35). The response Plaintiffs filed on April 19, 2011 (Doc. 35, Ex.

25

A), is deemed filed as of that date.

26
27
28

DATED this 2nd day of May, 2011.