Gingerbread House Incorporated v. Montana Builders LLC et al

Filing 17

ORDER granting 16 Motion for Entry of Default Judgment against Montana Builders, LLC, and Surety Partners, LLP, in the amount of $39,130.18, consisting of the principal sum of $37,605.50, $1094.68 for attorneys' fees, and $430.00 in costs. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Paul G Rosenblatt on 3/28/12.(LAD)

Download PDF
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 10 Gingerbread House, Inc., Plaintiffs, 11 12 v. 13 Montana Builders, LLC, et al., 14 Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CV 11-8126-PCT-PGR ORDER 15 16 17 Before the Court is Plaintiff Gingerbread House’s motion for entry of default judgment. (Doc. 16.) 18 On August 17, 2009, Defendant Montana Builders entered into a contract with the 19 United States to furnish materials and perform labor for the construction of the Pine Flat 20 Camp Ground Project. (Doc. 1, ¶ III.) On August 26, 2009, Montana Builders, as principal, 21 and Defendant Surety Partners delivered their bond to the United States as required by the 22 Miller Act, 40 U.S.C. § 3133. (Id., ¶ VI.) On October 6, 2009, Gingerbread House entered 23 into a contract with Montana Builders. (Id., ¶ VII.) 24 Gingerbread House furnished labor and equipment under the contract. (Id., ¶ VIII.) 25 The reasonable and agreed value of such labor was $281,329, of which Montana Builders has 26 paid $250,745, leaving a balance due of $30,584. (Id.) Gingerbread House performed extra 27 labor and provided additional materials with a reasonable value of $7,021.50, which Montana 28 Builders has not paid. Payment was due August 20, 2010. (Id.) 1 On August 15, 2011, Gingerbread House filed a complaint under the Miller Act. (Doc. 2 1.) Defendants failed to answer and on December 2, 2011, default was entered under Federal 3 Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a). (Doc. 14.) Gingerbread House now moves for default 4 judgment. (Doc. 16.) 5 After a default has been entered and the defendant fails to appear or move to set aside 6 the default under Rule 55(c), the Court may, on the plaintiff’s motion, enter a default 7 judgment. Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b)(2). Granting default judgment is within the Court’s sound 8 discretion. See Albade v. Aldabe, 616 F.2d 1089, 1092 (9th Cir. 1980). The Court may 9 consider such factors as the possibility of prejudice to the plaintiff, the merits of the 10 substantive claim, the sufficiency of the complaint, the sum of money at stake, the possibility 11 of a dispute concerning material facts, whether the default was due to excusable neglect, and 12 the policy favoring decisions on the merits. See Eitel v. McCool, 782 F.2d 1470, 1471–72 13 (9th Cir. 1986). 14 In considering these factors, all factual allegations in the plaintiff’s complaint are 15 taken as true, except those relating to damages. TeleVideo Sys., Inc. v. Heidenthal, 826 F.2d 16 915, 917–18 (9th Cir. 1987). A plaintiff is required to prove all damages sought in the 17 complaint. 18 Taking the allegations in the complaint as true, as required by Defendants’ default, 19 the Court finds that Gingerbread House is entitled to default judgment under the factors set 20 forth in Eitel, 782 F.2d at 1471–72. The claim is meritorious. Gingerbread House will be 21 prejudiced and potentially left without recourse for recovery if default judgment is denied. 22 There are no disputes concerning the relevant facts. It is unlikely that Defendants’ default is 23 the result of excusable neglect. 24 Gingerbread House seeks judgment of in the amount of $39,130.18, consisting of the 25 principal sum of $37,605.50, $1094.68 for attorneys’ fees, and $430.00 in costs. (Doc. 16.) 26 In support, Gingerbread House has submitted counsel’s affidavit and statements of costs and 27 fees. (Docs. 12, 13, Exs. 1, 2.) The Court finds that these amounts are reasonably calculated 28 -2- 1 and sufficient to prove Plaintiff’s damages. 2 Accordingly, 3 IT IS ORDERED granting Gingerbread House’s motion for entry of default judgment 4 (Doc. 16) against Montana Builders, LLC, and Surety Partners, LLP, in the amount of 5 $39,130.18, consisting of the principal sum of $37,605.50, $1094.68 for attorneys’ fees, and 6 $430.00 in costs. 7 8 9 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly. DATED this 28th day of March, 2012. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?