White v. Lindermen et al

Filing 87

ORDER denying 80 Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement. Signed by Senior Judge Robert C Broomfield on 3/28/14.(MAP)

Download PDF
1 WO 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 7 8 Demetrius M. White, Plaintiff, 9 10 11 ORDER v. Mike Lindermen, et al., 12 13 No. CV-11-08152-PCT-RCB Defendants. Currently pending before the court is the plaintiff pro se Demetrius M. White’s 14 Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement (Doc. 80). 15 moot because, as more fully set forth in the Defendants’ Sealed Response to Plaintiff’s 16 Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement (Doc. 82), the defendants have fully complied 17 with the terms of the Settlement Agreement. And, indeed, on February 13, 2014, the 18 plaintiff advised Assistant Arizona Attorney General Kelley J. Morrissey that he would 19 be withdrawing this motion, but to date he has not. 20 (Doc. 82-1) at 3:23-24, ¶ 7. 21 (1) 23 DENIED. Resp. (Doc. 82), exh. A thereto Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 22 The court denies his motion as 24 25 26 27 28 the plaintiff’s “Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement” (Doc. 80) is Dated this 28th day of March, 2014.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?