White v. Lindermen et al

Filing 87

ORDER denying 80 Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement. Signed by Senior Judge Robert C Broomfield on 3/28/14.(MAP)

1

WO

2
3
4
5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

7
8

Demetrius M. White,
Plaintiff,

9
10
11

ORDER

v.
Mike Lindermen, et al.,

12
13

No. CV-11-08152-PCT-RCB

Defendants.
Currently pending before the court is the plaintiff pro se Demetrius M. White’s

14

Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement (Doc. 80).

15

moot because, as more fully set forth in the Defendants’ Sealed Response to Plaintiff’s

16

Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement (Doc. 82), the defendants have fully complied

17

with the terms of the Settlement Agreement. And, indeed, on February 13, 2014, the

18

plaintiff advised Assistant Arizona Attorney General Kelley J. Morrissey that he would

19

be withdrawing this motion, but to date he has not.

20

(Doc. 82-1) at 3:23-24, ¶ 7.

21

(1)

23

DENIED.

Resp. (Doc. 82), exh. A thereto

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:

22

The court denies his motion as

24
25
26
27
28

the plaintiff’s “Motion to Enforce Settlement Agreement” (Doc. 80) is

Dated this 28th day of March, 2014.