Sykes v. Ryan et al

Filing 5

ORDER granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Complaint is dismissed for failure to state a claim. (Doc. 1.) Plaintiff has30 days from the date this Order is filed to file a first amended complaint in compliance with this Ord er. If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint within 30 days, the Clerk of Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action with prejudice that states that the dismissal may count as a strike under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). (See document for further details). Signed by Judge Robert C Broomfield on 11/29/11.(LAD)

Download PDF
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 10 11 Charles Delanders Sykes, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 vs. 15 Charles L. Ryan, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. CV 11-8156-PCT-RCB (MEA) ORDER 19 Plaintiff Charles Delanders Sykes, who is confined in the Arizona State Prison- 20 Kingman, Cerbat Unit, in Kingman, Arizona,1 has filed a pro se civil rights Complaint 21 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and an Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. The Court 22 will dismiss the Complaint with leave to amend. 23 I. Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis and Filing Fee 24 Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis will be granted. 28 U.S.C. 25 § 1915(a). Plaintiff must pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). 26 The Court will assess an initial partial filing fee of $19.56. The remainder of the fee will be 27 28 JDDL-K 1 The Arizona State Prison is operated by Management and Training Corporation (MTC) for the Arizona Department of Corrections (ADC). 1 collected monthly in payments of 20% of the previous month’s income each time the amount 2 in the account exceeds $10.00. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2). The Court will enter a separate 3 Order requiring the appropriate government agency to collect and forward the fees according 4 to the statutory formula. 5 II. Statutory Screening of Prisoner Complaints 6 The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against 7 a governmental entity or an officer or an employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. 8 § 1915A(a). The Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if a plaintiff has raised 9 claims that are legally frivolous or malicious, that fail to state a claim upon which relief may 10 be granted, or that seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 11 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1), (2). 12 A pleading must contain a “short and plain statement of the claim showing that the 13 pleader is entitled to relief.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2) (emphasis added). While Rule 8 does not 14 demand detailed factual allegations, “it demands more than an unadorned, the-defendant- 15 unlawfully-harmed-me accusation.” Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S. Ct. 1937, 1949 (2009). 16 “Threadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere conclusory 17 statements, do not suffice.” Id. 18 “[A] complaint must contain sufficient factual matter, accepted as true, to ‘state a 19 claim to relief that is plausible on its face.’” Id. (quoting Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 20 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). A claim is plausible “when the plaintiff pleads factual content 21 that allows the court to draw the reasonable inference that the defendant is liable for the 22 misconduct alleged.” Id. “Determining whether a complaint states a plausible claim for 23 relief [is] . . . a context-specific task that requires the reviewing court to draw on its judicial 24 experience and common sense.” Id. at 1950. Thus, although a plaintiff’s specific factual 25 allegations may be consistent with a constitutional claim, a court must assess whether there 26 are other “more likely explanations” for a defendant’s conduct. Id. at 1951. 27 28 JDDL-K But as the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has instructed, courts must “continue to construe pro se filings liberally.” Hebbe v. Pliler, 627 F.3d 338, 342 (9th -2- 1 Cir. 2010). A “complaint [filed by a pro se prisoner] ‘must be held to less stringent standards 2 than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers.’” Id. (quoting Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 3 94 (2007) (per curiam)). 4 If the Court determines that a pleading could be cured by the allegation of other facts, 5 a pro se litigant is entitled to an opportunity to amend a complaint before dismissal of the 6 action. See Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1127-29 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc). The Court 7 should not, however, advise the litigant how to cure the defects. This type of advice “would 8 undermine district judges’ role as impartial decisionmakers.” Pliler v. Ford, 542 U.S. 225, 9 231 (2004); see also Lopez, 203 F.3d at 1131 n.13 (declining to decide whether the court was 10 required to inform a litigant of deficiencies). The Court will dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint 11 for failure to state a claim, but because the Complaint may possibly be saved by amendment, 12 the Court will dismiss the Complaint with leave to amend. 13 III. Complaint 14 Plaintiff alleges three counts for threat to safety and violation of Equal Protection. 15 Plaintiff sues the Director of ADC, Charles L. Ryan, and Deputy Warden Polland. Plaintiff 16 seeks injunctive, compensatory, and punitive relief. 17 Plaintiff alleges the following facts in his Complaint: On May 31, 2010, Plaintiff was 18 walking in front of a dorm in the North Yard when he was assaulted by three White inmates 19 screaming “kill the niggers, kill the niggers” in a race riot on the yard. (Doc. 1 at 3.) At the 20 time, there were almost 600 White inmates and only 95 Black inmates on the North Yard. 21 If any officers were on the yard, Plaintiff did not see them and they failed to stop the assault 22 of Black inmates by White inmates, and specifically, his assault. Plaintiff was repeatedly 23 kicked in the face, head, and ribs and continues to suffer physical aftereffects of the assault. 24 While the attack was ongoing, Deputy Warden Polland ordered four prison officers in riot 25 gear with hand-held weapons to stand down. Plaintiff suffered physical and mental injuries. 26 He contends that despite being known to prison officials, the White inmates that assaulted 27 him and/or other Black inmates were not disciplined. 28 JDDL-K In a July 2, 2010 letter to Shelby Muhammad, apparently Plaintiff’s mother, Complex -3- 1 Administrator Darla Elliott denied Muhammad’s request for a full report on the incident. 2 Elliott maintained that prison staff had acted appropriately. 3 IV. Failure to State a Claim 4 To state a claim under § 1983, a plaintiff must allege facts supporting that (1) the 5 conduct about which he complains was committed by a person acting under the color of state 6 law and (2) the conduct deprived him of a federal constitutional or statutory right. Wood v. 7 Ostrander, 879 F.2d 583, 587 (9th Cir. 1989). A “‘plaintiff generally must assert his own 8 legal rights and interests, and cannot assert the legal rights or interests of third parties.’” 9 Mothershed v. Justices of the Supreme Court, 410 F.3d 602, 610 (9th Cir. 2005) (quoting 10 Warth v. Seldin, 422 U.S. 490, 499 (1975)). In addition, to state a valid constitutional claim, 11 a plaintiff must allege that he suffered a specific injury as a result of the conduct of a 12 particular defendant and he must allege an affirmative link between the injury and the 13 conduct of that defendant. Rizzo v. Goode, 423 U.S. 362, 371-72, 377 (1976). 14 15 conclusions, that show that an individual was personally involved in the deprivation of his 16 civil rights.” Barren v. Harrington, 152 F.3d 1193, 1194 (9th Cir. 1998). For an individual 17 to be liable in his official capacity, a plaintiff must allege that the official acted as a result of 18 a policy, practice, or custom. See Cortez v. County of Los Angeles, 294 F.3d 1186, 1188 19 (9th Cir. 2001). Further, there is no respondeat superior liability under § 1983, so a 20 defendant’s position as the supervisor of someone who allegedly violated a plaintiff’s 21 constitutional rights does not make him liable. Monell v. Dep’t of Soc. Servs., 436 U.S. 658, 22 691 (1978); Taylor v. List, 880 F.2d 1040, 1045 (9th Cir. 1989). A supervisor in his 23 individual capacity, “is only liable for constitutional violations of his subordinates if the 24 supervisor participated in or directed the violations, or knew of the violations and failed to 25 act to prevent them.” Taylor, 880 F.2d at 1045. In addition, where a defendant’s only 26 involvement in allegedly unconstitutional conduct is the denial of administrative grievances, 27 the failure to intervene on a prisoner’s behalf to remedy the alleged unconstitutional behavior 28 JDDL-K Further, to state a claim against a defendant, “[a] plaintiff must allege facts, not simply does not amount to active unconstitutional behavior for purposes of § 1983. Shehee v. -4- 1 Luttrell, 199 F.3d 295, 300 (6th Cir. 1999); accord Mintun v. Blades, No. CV-06-139, 2008 2 WL 711636, at *7 (D. Idaho Mar. 14, 2008); Stocker v. Warden, No. 1:07-CV-00589, 2009 3 WL 981323, at *10 (E.D. Cal. Apr. 13, 2009). 4 A. Ryan 5 In Count I, Plaintiff contends that Ryan is responsible for the administrative 6 application of policies by MTC and is responsible for the failure to assure the health and 7 safety of inmates. That is, Plaintiff asserts that Ryan is liable based on respondeat superior. 8 As discussed above, that is not a basis for liability under § 1983. Accordingly, Plaintiff fails 9 to state a claim against Ryan and he will be dismissed. 10 B. Threat to Safety 11 Plaintiff designates Counts I and II as claims for threats to safety or failure to protect. 12 To state a claim under § 1983 for failure to protect or threats to safety, an inmate must allege 13 facts to support that he was incarcerated under conditions posing a substantial risk of harm 14 and that prison officials were “deliberately indifferent” to those risks. Farmer v. Brennan, 15 511 U.S. 825, 832-33 (1994). To adequately allege deliberate indifference, a plaintiff must 16 allege facts to support that a defendant knew of, but disregarded, an excessive risk to inmate 17 safety. Id. at 837. That is, “the official must both [have been] aware of facts from which the 18 inference could be drawn that a substantial risk of serious harm exist[ed], and he must also 19 [have] draw[n] the inference.” Id. 20 In Count I, Plaintiff alleges that Deputy Warden Polland failed to maintain order and 21 should not have opened the North Yard knowing there was hostility. Plaintiff does not allege 22 facts to support that Polland knew or should have known that racial tensions among inmates 23 posed an excessive risk to inmate safety on the North Yard. Thus, Plaintiff fails to allege 24 facts to support that Polland opened the North Yard despite knowing of an excessive risk to 25 Black inmates, including Plaintiff. Therefore, Plaintiff fails to adequately state a claim 26 against Polland in Count I. 27 28 JDDL-K In Count II, Plaintiff merely alleges that his mother received a letter from a prison administrator refusing to provide a full report of the incident. Plaintiff’s allegations concern -5- 1 a third party, his mother, rather than him. The refusal to provide a report of an incident does 2 not rise to the level of a constitutional violation for threat to safety. Even if it did, Plaintiff 3 may not seek relief on behalf of a third party. See Mothershed, 410 F.3d at 610. For these 4 reasons, Plaintiff fails to state a claim in Count II. 5 C. Equal Protection 6 In Count III, Plaintiff alleges that the White instigators of the racial attack on him 7 were not punished or disciplined. The Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth 8 Amendment provides that a state may not “deny to any person within its jurisdiction the 9 equal protection of the laws,” which is essentially a direction that all persons similarly 10 situated should be treated alike. U.S. Const., amend. XIV; see City of Cleburne v. Cleburne 11 Living Ctr., Inc., 473 U.S. 432, 439 (1985). A state practice that interferes with a 12 fundamental right or that discriminates against a suspect class of individuals is subject to 13 strict scrutiny. Massachusetts Bd. of Ret. v. Murgia, 427 U.S. 307, 312 (1976); see City of 14 Cleburne, 473 U.S. at 441. Absent allegations that he is a member of a suspect class, or that 15 a fundamental right has been violated, a plaintiff must allege facts to support that he has been 16 intentionally treated differently from others who are similarly situated without a reasonable 17 basis therefor. See Village of Willowbrook v. Olech, 528 U.S. 562, 564 (2000). Conclusory 18 allegations do not suffice. See Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Hous. Dev. 19 Corp., 429 U.S. 252, 265 (1977). 20 Plaintiff alleges that White inmates who instigated or participated in assaulting him 21 were not disciplined. Plaintiff’s allegations are conclusory. He does not allege facts to 22 support that he ordinarily would be informed if discipline were imposed and by whom. 23 Further, he does not allege facts to support that the White inmates were treated differently 24 than non-White inmates with respect to discipline in connection with this incident based on 25 their race. Finally, Plaintiff fails to link any Defendant to this claimed constitutional 26 violation. For all of these reasons, he fails to state a claim in Count III. 27 V. 28 JDDL-K Leave to Amend For the foregoing reasons, Plaintiff’s Complaint will be dismissed for failure to state -6- 1 a claim upon which relief may be granted. Within 30 days, Plaintiff may submit a first 2 amended complaint to cure the deficiencies outlined above. The Clerk of Court will mail 3 Plaintiff a court-approved form to use for filing a first amended complaint. If Plaintiff fails 4 to use the court-approved form, the Court may strike the amended complaint and dismiss this 5 action without further notice to Plaintiff. 6 Plaintiff must clearly designate on the face of the document that it is the “First 7 Amended Complaint.” The first amended complaint must be retyped or rewritten in its 8 entirety on the court-approved form and may not incorporate any part of the original 9 Complaint by reference. Plaintiff may include only one claim per count. 10 A first amended complaint supersedes the original complaint. Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 11 F.2d 1258, 1262 (9th Cir. 1992); Hal Roach Studios v. Richard Feiner & Co., 896 F.2d 1542, 12 1546 (9th Cir. 1990). After amendment, the Court will treat an original complaint as 13 nonexistent. Ferdik, 963 F.2d at 1262. Any cause of action that was raised in the original 14 complaint is waived if it is not raised in a first amended complaint. King v. Atiyeh, 814 F.2d 15 565, 567 (9th Cir. 1987). 16 VI. Warnings 17 A. Release 18 Plaintiff must pay the unpaid balance of the filing fee within 120 days of his release. 19 Also, within 30 days of his release, he must either (1) notify the Court that he intends to pay 20 the balance or (2) show good cause, in writing, why he cannot. Failure to comply may result 21 in dismissal of this action. 22 B. Address Changes 23 Plaintiff must file and serve a notice of a change of address in accordance with Rule 24 83.3(d) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff must not include a motion for other 25 relief with a notice of change of address. Failure to comply may result in dismissal of this 26 action. 27 28 JDDL-K C. Copies Plaintiff must submit an additional copy of every filing for use by the Court. See -7- 1 LRCiv 5.4. Failure to comply may result in the filing being stricken without further notice 2 to Plaintiff. 3 D. Possible “Strike” 4 Because the Complaint has been dismissed for failure to state a claim, if Plaintiff fails 5 to file an amended complaint correcting the deficiencies identified in this Order, the 6 dismissal may count as a “strike” under the “3-strikes” provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 7 Under the 3-strikes provision, a prisoner may not bring a civil action or appeal a civil 8 judgment in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 “if the prisoner has, on 3 or more prior 9 occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a 10 court of the United States that was dismissed on the grounds that it is frivolous, malicious, 11 or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, unless the prisoner is under 12 imminent danger of serious physical injury.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 13 E. Possible Dismissal 14 If Plaintiff fails to timely comply with every provision of this Order, including these 15 warnings, the Court may dismiss this action without further notice. See Ferdik, 963 F.2d at 16 1260-61 (a district court may dismiss an action for failure to comply with any order of the 17 Court). 18 IT IS ORDERED: 19 (1) Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis is granted. (Doc. 2.) 20 (2) As required by the accompanying Order to the appropriate government agency, 21 22 Plaintiff must pay the $350.00 filing fee and is assessed an initial partial filing fee of $19.56. (3) The Complaint is dismissed for failure to state a claim. (Doc. 1.) Plaintiff has 23 30 days from the date this Order is filed to file a first amended complaint in compliance with 24 this Order. 25 (4) If Plaintiff fails to file an amended complaint within 30 days, the Clerk of 26 Court must, without further notice, enter a judgment of dismissal of this action with prejudice 27 that states that the dismissal may count as a “strike” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 28 JDDL-K (5) The Clerk of Court must mail Plaintiff a court-approved form for filing a civil -8- 1 2 rights complaint by a prisoner. DATED this 29th day of November, 2011. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JDDL-K -9- Instructions for a Prisoner Filing a Civil Rights Complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona 1. Who May Use This Form. The civil rights complaint form is designed to help incarcerated persons prepare a complaint seeking relief for a violation of their federal civil rights. These complaints typically concern, but are not limited to, conditions of confinement. This form should not be used to challenge your conviction or sentence. If you want to challenge a state conviction or sentence, you should file a petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 for a writ of habeas corpus by a person in state custody. If you want to challenge a federal conviction or sentence, you should file a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate sentence in the federal court that entered the judgment. 2. The Form. Local Rule of Civil Procedure (LRCiv) 3.4(a) provides that complaints by incarcerated persons must be filed on the court-approved form. The form must be typed or neatly handwritten. The form must be completely filled in to the extent applicable. All questions must be answered clearly and concisely in the appropriate space on the form. If needed, you may attach additional pages, but no more than fifteen additional pages, of standard letter-sized paper. You must identify which part of the complaint is being continued and number all pages. If you do not fill out the form properly, you will be asked to submit additional or corrected information, which may delay the processing of your action. You do not need to cite law. 3. Your Signature. You must tell the truth and sign the form. If you make a false statement of a material fact, you may be prosecuted for perjury. 4. The Filing Fee. The filing fee for this action is $350.00. If you are unable to immediately pay the filing fee, you may request leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Please review the “Information for Prisoners Seeking Leave to Proceed with a (Non-Habeas) Civil Action in Federal Court In Forma Pauperis Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915” for additional instructions. 5. Original and Judge’s Copy. You must send an original plus one copy of your complaint and of any other documents submitted to the Court. You must send one additional copy to the Court if you wish to have a file-stamped copy of the document returned to you. All copies must be identical to the original. Copies may be legibly handwritten. 6. Where to File. You should file your complaint in the division where you were confined when your rights were allegedly violated. See LRCiv 5.1(a) and 77.1(a). If you were confined in Maricopa, Pinal, Yuma, La Paz, or Gila County, file in the Phoenix Division. If you were confined in Apache, Navajo, Coconino, Mohave, or Yavapai County, file in the Prescott Division. If you were confined in Pima, Cochise, Santa Cruz, Graham, or Greenlee County, file in the Tucson Division. Mail the original and one copy of the complaint with the $350 filing fee or the application to proceed in forma pauperis to: Revised 3/9/07 1 Phoenix & Prescott Divisions: OR U.S. District Court Clerk U.S. Courthouse, Suite 130 401 West Washington Street, SPC 10 Phoenix, Arizona 85003-2119 Tucson Division: U.S. District Court Clerk U.S. Courthouse, Suite 1500 405 West Congress Street Tucson, Arizona 85701-5010 7. Change of Address. You must immediately notify the Court and the defendants in writing of any change in your mailing address. Failure to notify the Court of any change in your mailing address may result in the dismissal of your case. 8. Certificate of Service. You must furnish the defendants with a copy of any document you submit to the Court (except the initial complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis). Each original document (except the initial complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis) must include a certificate of service on the last page of the document stating the date a copy of the document was mailed to the defendants and the address to which it was mailed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 5(a), (d). Any document received by the Court that does not include a certificate of service may be stricken. A certificate of service should be in the following form: I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing document was mailed this (month, day, year) to: Name: Address: Attorney for Defendant(s) (Signature) 9. Amended Complaint. If you need to change any of the information in the initial complaint, you must file an amended complaint. The amended complaint must be written on the courtapproved civil rights complaint form. You may file one amended complaint without leave (permission) of Court before any defendant has answered your original complaint. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a). After any defendant has filed an answer, you must file a motion for leave to amend and lodge (submit) a proposed amended complaint. LRCiv 15.1. In addition, an amended complaint may not incorporate by reference any part of your prior complaint. LRCiv 15.1(a)(2). Any allegations or defendants not included in the amended complaint are considered dismissed. All amended complaints are subject to screening under the Prison Litigation Reform Act; screening your amendment will take additional processing time. 10. Exhibits. You should not submit exhibits with the complaint or amended complaint. Instead, the relevant information should be paraphrased. You should keep the exhibits to use to support or oppose a motion to dismiss, a motion for summary judgment, or at trial. 11. Letters and Motions. It is generally inappropriate to write a letter to any judge or the staff of any judge. The only appropriate way to communicate with the Court is by filing a written pleading or motion. 2 12. Completing the Civil Rights Complaint Form. HEADING: 1. Your Name. Print your name, prison or inmate number, and institutional mailing address on the lines provided. 2. Defendants. If there are four or fewer defendants, print the name of each. If you name more than four defendants, print the name of the first defendant on the first line, write the words “and others” on the second line, and attach an additional page listing the names of all of the defendants. Insert the additional page after page 1 and number it “1A” at the bottom. 3. Jury Demand. If you want a jury trial, you must write “JURY TRIAL DEMANDED” in the space below “CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT BY A PRISONER.” Failure to do so may result in the loss of the right to a jury trial. A jury trial is not available if you are seeking only injunctive relief. Part A. JURISDICTION: 1. Nature of Suit. Mark whether you are filing the complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for state, county, or city defendants; “Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents” for federal defendants; or “other.” If you mark “other,” identify the source of that authority. 2. Location. Identify the institution and city where the alleged violation of your rights occurred. 3. Defendants. Print all of the requested information about each of the defendants in the spaces provided. If you are naming more than four defendants, you must provide the necessary information about each additional defendant on separate pages labeled “2-A,” “2-B,” etc., at the bottom. Insert the additional page(s) immediately behind page 2. Part B. PREVIOUS LAWSUITS: You must identify any other lawsuit you have filed in either state or federal court while you were a prisoner. Print all of the requested information about each lawsuit in the spaces provided. If you have filed more than three lawsuits, you must provide the necessary information about each additional lawsuit on a separate page. Label the page(s) as “2-A,” “2B,” etc., at the bottom of the page and insert the additional page(s) immediately behind page 2. Part C. CAUSE OF ACTION: You must identify what rights each defendant violated. The form provides space to allege three separate counts (one violation per count). If you are alleging more than three counts, you must provide the necessary information about each additional count on a separate page. Number the additional pages “5-A,” “5-B,” etc., and insert them immediately behind page 5. Remember that you are limited to a total of fifteen additional pages. 3 1. Counts. You must identify which civil right was violated. You may allege the violation of only one civil right per count. 2. Issue Involved. Check the box that most closely identifies the issue involved in your claim. You may check only one box per count. If you check the box marked “Other,” you must identify the specific issue involved. 3. Supporting Facts. After you have identified which civil right was violated, you must state the supporting facts. Be as specific as possible. You must state what each individual defendant did to violate your rights. If there is more than one defendant, you must identify which defendant did what act. You also should state the date(s) on which the act(s) occurred, if possible. 4. Injury. State precisely how you were injured by the alleged violation of your rights. 5. Administrative Remedies. You must exhaust any available administrative remedies before you file a civil rights complaint. See 42 U.S.C. § 1997e. Consequently, you should disclose whether you have exhausted the inmate grievance procedures or administrative appeals for each count in your complaint. If the grievance procedures were not available for any of your counts, fully explain why on the lines provided. Part D. REQUEST FOR RELIEF: Print the relief you are seeking in the space provided. SIGNATURE: You must sign your name and print the date you signed the complaint. Failure to sign the complaint will delay the processing of your action. Unless you are an attorney, you may not bring an action on behalf of anyone but yourself. FINAL NOTE You should follow these instructions carefully. Failure to do so may result in your complaint being stricken or dismissed. All questions must be answered concisely in the proper space on the form. If you need more space, you may attach no more than fifteen additional pages. But the form must be completely filled in to the extent applicable. If you attach additional pages, be sure to identify which section of the complaint is being continued and number the pages. 4 Name and Prisoner/Booking Number Place of Confinement Mailing Address City, State, Zip Code (Failure to notify the Court of your change of address may result in dismissal of this action.) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA (Full Name of Plaintiff) Plaintiff, vs. (1) (Full Name of Defendant) (2) (3) (4) Defendant(s). G Check if there are additional Defendants and attach page 1-A listing them. ) , ) ) ) ) CASE NO. ) (To be supplied by the Clerk) , ) ) , ) CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT ) , ) BY A PRISONER ) , ) G Original Complaint G First Amended Complaint ) ) G Second Amended Complaint A. JURISDICTION 1. 2. This Court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to: G 28 U.S.C. § 1343(a); 42 U.S.C. § 1983 G 28 U.S.C. § 1331; Bivens v. Six Unknown Federal Narcotics Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). G Other: . Institution/city where violation occurred: . Revised 3/9/07 1 550/555 B. DEFENDANTS 1. Name of first Defendant: at . The first Defendant is employed as: . (Position and Title) 2. (Institution) Name of second Defendant: at . The second Defendant is employed as: . (Position and Title) 3. (Institution) Name of third Defendant: at . The third Defendant is employed as: . (Position and Title) 4. (Institution) Name of fourth Defendant: at . The fourth Defendant is employed as: . (Position and Title) (Institution) If you name more than four Defendants, answer the questions listed above for each additional Defendant on a separate page. C. PREVIOUS LAWSUITS 1. Have you filed any other lawsuits while you were a prisoner? 2. If yes, how many lawsuits have you filed? G Yes G No . Describe the previous lawsuits: a. First prior lawsuit: 1. Parties: v. 2. Court and case number: 3. Result: (Was the case dismissed? Was it appealed? Is it still pending?) . . b. Second prior lawsuit: v. 1. Parties: 2. Court and case number: 3. Result: (Was the case dismissed? Was it appealed? Is it still pending?) . . c. Third prior lawsuit: 1. Parties: v. 2. Court and case number: 3. Result: (Was the case dismissed? Was it appealed? Is it still pending?) . . If you filed more than three lawsuits, answer the questions listed above for each additional lawsuit on a separate page. 2 D. CAUSE OF ACTION 1. COUNT I State the constitutional or other federal civil right that was violated: . 2. Count I. Identify the issue involved. Check only one. State additional issues in separate counts. G Basic necessities G Mail G Access to the court G Medical care G Disciplinary proceedings G Property G Exercise of religion G Retaliation G Excessive force by an officer G Threat to safety G Other: . 3. Supporting Facts. State as briefly as possible the FACTS supporting Count I. Describe exactly what each Defendant did or did not do that violated your rights. State the facts clearly in your own words without citing legal authority or arguments. . 4. Injury. State how you were injured by the actions or inactions of the Defendant(s). . 5. Administrative Remedies: a. Are there any administrative remedies (grievance procedures or administrative appeals) available G Yes G No at your institution? b. Did you submit a request for administrative relief on Count I? G Yes G No c. Did you appeal your request for relief on Count I to the highest level? G Yes G No d. If you did not submit or appeal a request for administrative relief at any level, briefly explain why you did not. . 3 1. COUNT II State the constitutional or other federal civil right that was violated: . 2. Count II. Identify the issue involved. Check only one. State additional issues in separate counts. G Basic necessities G Mail G Access to the court G Medical care G Disciplinary proceedings G Property G Exercise of religion G Retaliation G Excessive force by an officer G Threat to safety G Other: . 3. Supporting Facts. State as briefly as possible the FACTS supporting Count II. Describe exactly what each Defendant did or did not do that violated your rights. State the facts clearly in your own words without citing legal authority or arguments. . 4. Injury. State how you were injured by the actions or inactions of the Defendant(s). . 5. Administrative Remedies. a. Are there any administrative remedies (grievance procedures or administrative appeals) available at your institution? G Yes G No b. Did you submit a request for administrative relief on Count II? G Yes G No c. Did you appeal your request for relief on Count II to the highest level? G Yes G No d. If you did not submit or appeal a request for administrative relief at any level, briefly explain why you did not. . 4 1. COUNT III State the constitutional or other federal civil right that was violated: . 2. Count III. Identify the issue involved. Check only one. State additional issues in separate counts. G Basic necessities G Mail G Access to the court G Medical care G Disciplinary proceedings G Property G Exercise of religion G Retaliation G Excessive force by an officer G Threat to safety G Other: . 3. Supporting Facts. State as briefly as possible the FACTS supporting Count III. Describe exactly what each Defendant did or did not do that violated your rights. State the facts clearly in your own words without citing legal authority or arguments. . 4. Injury. State how you were injured by the actions or inactions of the Defendant(s). . 5. Administrative Remedies. a. Are there any administrative remedies (grievance procedures or administrative appeals) available G Yes G No at your institution? b. Did you submit a request for administrative relief on Count III? G Yes G No c. Did you appeal your request for relief on Count III to the highest level? G Yes G No d. If you did not submit or appeal a request for administrative relief at any level, briefly explain why you did not. . If you assert more than three Counts, answer the questions listed above for each additional Count on a separate page. 5 E. REQUEST FOR RELIEF State the relief you are seeking: . I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on DATE SIGNATURE OF PLAINTIFF (Name and title of paralegal, legal assistant, or other person who helped prepare this complaint) (Signature of attorney, if any) (Attorney’s address & telephone number) ADDITIONAL PAGES All questions must be answered concisely in the proper space on the form. If you need more space, you may attach no more than fifteen additional pages. But the form must be completely filled in to the extent applicable. If you attach additional pages, be sure to identify which section of the complaint is being continued and number all pages. 6

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?