Nowak v. Isles Homeowners' Association
Filing
26
ORDER that the Clerk of Court is kindly directed to seal Plaintiff's emailand mail or electronically deliver a complete copy of Plaintiff's email and this Order to Plaintiff and counsel of record. This Order, however, is not sealed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lawrence O Anderson on 1/18/13. (Attachments: # 1 Sealed E-Mail)(MAP)
1
WO
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
Kirk Nowak,
9
Plaintiff,
10
vs.
11
Isles Homeowners’ Association,
12
Defendant.
13
14
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. CV-12-8023-PCT-FJM
ORDER
The undersigned Magistrate Judge has received from pro se Plaintiff an un-
15
solicited and prohibited ex parte e-mail in his chamber’s e-mailbox. Though the under-
16
signed is neither the assigned trial judge nor has the case been referred to him, this Judge
17
was assigned to conduct a settlement conference in May 2012 which was never held.
18
Because Plaintiff’s e-mail does not reflect a copy was sent to counsel of record, the
19
Court deems the letter to be an innocent but prohibited ex-parte communication with the
20
Court. See Best Western Intern., Inc. v. Melbourne Hotel Investors, LLC, 2008 WL
21
2945513, at *1 n. 1 (D. Ariz. July 28, 2008) (“[E]x parte communications are barred even
22
if it is not clear that the lawyer intended to influence the judge.”) (citation omitted); see
23
also San Carlos Apache Tribe v. Bolton ex rel. County of Maricopa, 194 Ariz. 68, 977
24
P.2d 790, 794 (Ariz. 1999) (“[W]ith some exceptions, ‘all parties or their lawyers shall be
25
included in communications with a judge.’” (citation omitted)). “Canon 3(B)(7) generally
26
prohibits a judge from initiating, permitting, or considering communications made
27
‘outside the presence of the parties concerning a pending or impending proceeding.’” San
28
Carlos Apache Tribe, 194 Ariz. 68, 977 P.2d at 794; see also Church of Scientology
1
Intern. v. Kolts, 846 F.Supp. 873, 877 n. 2 (C.D. Cal. 1994). Like the lawyer in San
2
Carlos Apache Tribe, Plaintiff is cautioned against initiating ex parte communications
3
with an adjudication judge. Id. at 796.
4
Except for this Order, the e-mail will be filed under seal with no action or response
5
taken by the undersigned Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff is directed to comply with Rule
6
5(a)(1), Fed.R.Civ.P., regarding all future pleadings, letters, e-mails or other writings in
7
this matter and to reflect such mailing or delivery on the filing or document itself. Unless
8
expressly authorized by the judge or rule, all future pleadings, letters, e-mails or other
9
writings in this case must not mailed or delivered to such judge.
10
Accordingly,
11
IT IS ORDERED that the Clerk of Court is kindly directed to seal Plaintiff’s e-
12
mail and mail or electronically deliver a complete copy of Plaintiff’s email and this Order
13
to Plaintiff and counsel of record. This Order, however, is not sealed.
14
Dated this 18th day of January, 2013.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?