Keaton #154007 v. Ryan et al

Filing 16

ORDER denying 11 Petitioner's "motion to preclude state's answering brief"; denying as moot 15 Petitioner's "motion for court to accept Petitioner's consent". Signed by Magistrate Judge Michelle H Burns on 11/30/12.(DMT)

1

WO

2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA

8
9

Sidney Ray Keaton,
Petitioner,

10
11

vs.

12

Charles L. Ryan, et al.,

13

Respondents.

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

CIV 12-8114-PCT-DGC (MHB)
ORDER

The Court, having considered Petitioner’s “motion to preclude state’s answering brief”
(Doc. 11) and “motion for court to accept Petitioner’s consent” (Doc. 15),
IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner’s “motion to preclude state’s answering brief”
(Doc. 11) is DENIED;
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner’s “motion for court to accept
Petitioner’s consent” (Doc. 15) is DENIED as moot.
DATED this 30th day of November, 2012.