R. Prasad Industries v. Flat Irons Environmental Solutions Corporation et al
Filing
141
ORDER, Defendants shall file a sur-reply to Plaintiff's motion for partial summary judgment by 11/14/14, addressing only the new evidence and arguments offered by Plaintiff in its reply to its motion for partial summary judgment. Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 11/10/14. (REW)
1
WO
2
3
4
5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
7
8
R. Prasad Industries,
No. CV-12-08261-PCT-JAT
Plaintiff,
9
10
v.
11
ORDER
Flat Irons Environmental Solutions
Corporation, et al.,
12
Defendants.
13
14
15
On March 26, 2014, Plaintiff R. Prasad Industries moved for partial summary
16
judgment. (Doc. 103). Defendants filed its opposition to the motion on April 28, 2014,
17
objecting to a number of documents Plaintiff submitted in support of its Motion.
18
(Doc. 109). Plaintiff filed its reply on May 15, 2014, along with a supplemental statement
19
of facts and additional evidence to rebut the arguments Defendants made in their
20
opposition. (Doc. 112). Because it would be unfair to consider evidence presented in
21
Plaintiff’s reply without giving Defendants an opportunity to respond, see Provenz v.
22
Miller, 102 F.3d 1478, 1483 (9th Cir. 1996), the Court will allow Defendants to file a sur-
23
reply to Plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment. The sur-reply must address
24
only the new evidence and arguments offered by Plaintiff in its reply.
25
Accordingly,
26
\
27
\
28
\
1
IT IS ORDERED that Defendants shall file a sur-reply to Plaintiff’s motion for
2
partial summary judgment by November 14, 2014, addressing only the new evidence and
3
arguments offered by Plaintiff in its reply to its motion for partial summary judgment.
4
Dated this 10th day of November, 2014.
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?