United States of America v. Christensen
Filing
32
ORDER: IT IS ORDERED that the government will file a reply no later than Thursday, December 20, 2012. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondent shall file a sur-response addressing his present inability to comply no later than Thursday, December 20, 2012. Finally, IT IS ORDERED that the parties will appear for a hearing on purgation of the contempt order on Friday, December 21, 2012, at 9:30 a.m. Respondent should come prepared to either produce the requested documents or produce credible evidence establishing his present inability to comply. Counsel for the United States should come prepared to cross examine the respondent [see Order for details]. Signed by Judge Frederick J Martone on 12/18/12. (MAW)
1
WO
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
9
United States of America,
Petitioner,
10
11
vs.
12
Gary S. Christensen,
13
Respondent.
14
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. MC-12-8002-PCT-FJM
ORDER
15
16
17
On December 11, 2012, Respondent was held in contempt of court for refusing to
18
comply with our order enforcing an IRS summons. He is now incarcerated. On December
19
14, 2012, the government filed a status report (Doc. 30) regarding respondent’s effort to
20
purge the finding of contempt. The government reports that respondent now states that he
21
is unable to produce many of the documents required by summons. Respondent filed a
22
response to the status report (Doc. 31) arguing that his sworn declaration that he has no
23
additional documents should be sufficient to purge the contempt order. We disagree.
24
Respondent has the burden of demonstrating a present inability to produce the
25
requested documents. United States v. Rylander, 460 U.S. 752, 757 (1983); United States
26
v. Bright, 596 F.3d 683, 695 (9th Cir. 2010). He must introduce credible evidence that he
27
has made “all reasonable efforts to comply.” United States v. Hayes, 722 F.2d 723, 725
28
(11th Cir. 1984). For example, did the documents ever exist? In so, where are they now?
1
Have they been destroyed? If so, when and by whom? And so forth. In the absence of
2
corroborating evidence, we need not credit respondent’s declaration that documents named
3
in the summons do not exist. Bright, 596 F.3d at 695 (citing Maggio v. Zeitz, 333 U.S. 56,
4
75-76 (1948)).
5
IT IS ORDERED that the government will file a reply no later than Thursday,
6
December 20, 2012. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Respondent shall file a sur-
7
response addressing his present inability to comply no later than Thursday, December 20,
8
2012. Finally, IT IS ORDERED that the parties will appear for a hearing on purgation of
9
the contempt order on Friday, December 21, 2012, at 9:30 a.m. Respondent should come
10
prepared to either produce the requested documents or produce credible evidence establishing
11
his present inability to comply. Counsel for the United States should come prepared to cross
12
examine the respondent.
13
DATED this 18th day of December, 2012.
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?