Sam v. USA

Filing 19

ORDER ACCEPTING AND ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 18 - IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Movant's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Doc. 1 ) is DENIED WITH PREJUDICE; and the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that a Certificate of Appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal are denied because Movant has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. (See document for further details). Signed by Senior Judge James A Teilborg on 1/20/16. (LAD)

Download PDF
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Tyrone James Sam, Petitioner, 10 11 ORDER v. 12 No. CV-14-08215-PCT-JAT CR-12-8176-PCT-JAT USA, 13 Respondent. 14 15 Pending before the Court is Movant’s Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct 16 Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Doc. 1). The Magistrate Judge issued a Report 17 and Recommendation (R&R) (Doc. 18) recommending that the Motion be denied. 18 Neither party has filed objections to the R&R. Accordingly, the Court hereby 19 accepts the R&R. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985) (finding that district 20 courts are not required to conduct “any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the 21 subject of an objection” (emphasis added)); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 22 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (“statute makes it clear that the district judge must review 23 the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but 24 not otherwise” (emphasis in original)); see also Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F.Supp.2d 25 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003). 26 Accordingly, 27 IT IS ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 28 18) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED; 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Movant’s Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Doc. 1) is DENIED WITH PREJUDICE; and the Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly. IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that a Certificate of Appealability and leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal are denied because Movant has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Dated this 20th day of January, 2016. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?