Rodrigues v. Ryan et al
Filing
146
ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that the Plaintiff show cause no later than January 11, 2019 why this case should not be dismissed for Plaintiff's failure to (i) abide by the Court's Order, and (ii) prosecute the case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Signed by Magistrate Judge Eileen S Willett on 12/21/18. (LAD)
1
WO
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
8
9
Anthony L Rodrigues,
10
Plaintiff,
11
ORDER
v.
12
No. CV-16-08272-PCT-DGC (ESW)
Charles L Ryan, et al.,
13
Defendants.
14
15
16
On December 13, 2018, the Court issued an Order (Doc. 144) which was mailed to
17
the Plaintiff at his address as reflected in Plaintiff’s Notice of Change of Address filed
18
October 5, 2018 (Doc. 142). On December 19, 2018, the Court’s mailing was returned
19
with the following notation from the United States Postal Service (“USPS”): “Return to
20
Sender/Not deliverable as Addressed/Unable to Forward.”
21
By Order issued March 1, 2017, the Court advised Plaintiff that “[i]f Plaintiff’s
22
address changes, Plaintiff must file and serve a notice of a change of address in accordance
23
with Rule 83.3(d) of the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. . . . Failure to comply may result
24
in dismissal of this action.” (Doc. 7 at 10). Plaintiff is aware of the Court’s warning as
25
evidenced by several Notices of Change of Address filed in this matter (Docs. 137, 140).
26
As of the date of the filing of this Order, Plaintiff has not filed an updated Notice of Change
27
of Address as required.
28
1
IT IS ORDERED that the Plaintiff show cause no later than January 11, 2019 why
2
this case should not be dismissed for Plaintiff’s failure to (i) abide by the Court’s Order,
3
and (ii) prosecute the case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
4
Dated this 21st day of December, 2018.
5
6
7
Honorable Eileen S. Willett
United States Magistrate Judge
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?